Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 9—September 2021
Research

Development and Clinical Evaluation of a CRISPR-Based Diagnostic for Rapid Group B Streptococcus Screening

Lingxiao Jiang1, Weiqi Zeng1, Wanting Wu1, Yingying Deng, Fusheng He, Wenli Liang, Mingyao Huang, Hong Huang, Yongjun Li, Xiaorui Wang, Hang Su, Shilei PanComments to Author , and Teng Xu1Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China (L. Jiang, Y. Deng, W. Liang, M. Huang); Vision Medicals Center for Medical Research, Shenzhen, China (W. Zeng, W. Wu, H. Huang, Y. Li, X. Wang, H. Su, T. Xu); Key Laboratory of Animal Gene Editing and Animal Cloning in Yunnan Province and College of Veterinary Medicine, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China (W. Zeng, T. Xu); Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou (S. Pan)

Main Article

Table

Positive and negative agreement of CRISPR-based diagnostic for rapid group B Streptococcus screening versus different reference standards*

Assay and result CRISPR-GBS
% (95% CI)
Sensitivity
Specificity
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
Positive Negative Total
Direct culture
Positive 52 3 55 94.5 (83.9–98.6)
89.6 (85.9–92.5)
58.4 (47.5–68.6)
99.1 (97.1–99.8)
Negative 37 320 357
Total
89
323
412

PCR
Positive 54 3 57 94.7 (84.5–98.6)
90.1 (86.4–92.9)
60.7 (49.7–70.7)
99.1 (97.1–99.8)
Negative 35 320 355
Total
89
323
412

Direct culture and PCR
Positive 47 3 50 94.0 (82.5–98.4)
91.4 (87.9–94.0)
61.0 (49.2–71.7)
99.0 (97.1–99.8)
Negative 30 320 350
Total
77
323
400

Enriched culture
Positive 22 0 22 100 (81.5–100.0) 100 (62.9–100.0) 100 (81.5–100.0) 100 (62.9–100.0)
Negative 0 9 9
Total 22 9 31

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: July 14, 2021
Page updated: August 25, 2021
Page reviewed: August 25, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external