Volume 28, Number 5—May 2022
SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence after Third Wave of Infections, South Africa
By November 2021, after the third wave of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in South Africa, seroprevalence was 60% in a rural community and 70% in an urban community. High seroprevalence before the Omicron variant emerged may have contributed to reduced illness severity observed in the fourth wave.
South Africa has experienced 4 waves of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, the fourth dominated by the Omicron variant of concern (1). Data on the proportion of the population with serologic evidence of previous infection at the time of Omicron emergence are important to contextualize the observed rapid increases and subsequent quick decline in case numbers (1), as well as the lower severity compared with previous variants (2).
We previously described the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the PHIRST-C (Prospective Household Study of SARSCoV-2, Influenza, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Community Burden, Transmission Dynamics, and Viral Interaction) cohort in a rural and an urban community at 5 timepoints during July 2020–March 2021 (3). By using the same methods (Appendix), we report seroprevalence at 4 additional timepoints through November 27, 2021, spanning the third, Delta-dominated wave (Appendix Figure 1), ending the week Omicron was identified (4). We tested serum samples by using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche Diagnostics, https://www.roche.com); we considered a cutoff index >1.0 an indication of prior infection. The immunoassay detects nucleocapsid (N) antibodies; thus, it does not detect postvaccination antibody responses. We obtained seroprevalence 95% credible intervals (CrIs) by using Bayesian inference with 10,000 posterior draws (5). We estimated the age- and sex-adjusted number of infections and age-adjusted diagnosed cases, hospitalizations, deaths, case-to-infection ratio (CIR), hospitalization-to-infection ratio (HIR), and in-hospital and excess death fatality-to-infection ratio (FIR), as described previously (3) (Appendix). Third-wave infections were defined as participants who had a paired blood draw (BD) from the fifth timepoint of the previous study (BD5) (collected March 22–April 11, 2021) and from the ninth timepoint of this study (BD9) (collected November 15–27, 2021) and who were seronegative at BD5 and seropositive at BD9 or seropositive at BD5 but had a >2-fold higher cutoff index in BD9 (because 38 possible reinfections occurred after BD5 [Appendix]). We obtained vaccination status through reviewing vaccine cards that participants kept at home. The study was approved by the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (reference no. 150808); the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention relied on local clearance (IRB approval no. 6840).
Overall, pre–third wave (BD5) SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence adjusted for assay sensitivity and specificity was 26% (95% CrI 22%–29%) in the rural and 41% (95% CrI 37%–45%) in the urban community. After the third wave (BD9), overall seroprevalence increased to 60% (95% CrI 56%–64%) in the rural community and 70% (95% CrI 66%–74%) in the urban community (Figure; Appendix Table 1). In both communities, the largest increase in seroprevalence was seen in children 13–18 years of age, who also had the highest seroprevalence of all ages after the third wave: 80% (95% CrI 70%–88%) in the rural community (a 49% increase) and 83% (95% CrI 73%–90%) in the urban community (a 19% increase).
During the third wave of infections, the incidence at the rural site was 39% (95% CrI 24%–55%), resulting in a CIR of 3% (95% CI 2%–5%). HIR was 0.5% (95% CI 0.3%–0.7%) and in-hospital FIR was 0.1% (95% CI 0.1%–0.2%); excess deaths FIR was 0.5% (95% CI 0.4%–0.8%) (Figure; Appendix Figure 2).
In the urban community, the incidence during the third wave was 40% (95% CrI 26%–54%). CIR was a 5% (95% CI 4%–8%), and HIR was 2% (95% CI 2%–4%). In-hospital FIR was 0.4% (95% CI 0.3%–0.6%) and excess deaths FIR was 0.6% (95% CI 0.4%–0.9%) (Figure; Appendix Figure 2).
HIR and FIR were similar between wave 2 and 3 (Appendix Figure 3). SARS-CoV-2 vaccines became available in South Africa in February 2021, after the second wave. By the end of wave 3, only 8% (49/609) of participants were fully vaccinated (1 dose of Johnson & Johnson/Janssen or 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech) in the rural community and 19% (97/512) in the urban community (Appendix Table 2). Considering the overall low vaccination coverage in these communities during the study period, the similar HIR and FIR in wave 2 and 3 were likely driven by a combination of natural immunity and potentially a moderate effect attributable to vaccination.
Taken together, by the end of November 2021, just before the emergence of Omicron, the combined proportion of persons who had serologic evidence of previous infection (at any timepoint), were fully vaccinated, or both was 62% (389/631) at the rural community and 72% (411/568) at the urban community (Appendix Table 3).
After the third wave of infections in South Africa, we observed a >60% overall seroprevalence attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, ranging from 43% in rural community children <5 years of age to 83% in urban community children 13–18 years of age (Figure). CIR, HIR, and FIRs were similar between the second and third waves. Similar to our data, results from a study in Gauteng Province found seroprevalence of 56%–80% attributable to natural infection before the emergence of Omicron (6). The high seroprevalence before Omicron emergence may have contributed to reduced illness severity observed in the fourth wave (2).
Ms. Kleynhans is an epidemiologist in the Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases. Her primary research interests include the epidemiology of respiratory diseases like influenza and COVID-19, vaccine impact studies, and modelling of infectious disease transmission dynamics.
We thank all persons participating in the study and the field teams for their hard work and dedication to the study, the laboratory teams, the PHIRST-C scientific and safety committee, the national SARS-CoV-2 National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) surveillance team, and NICD Information Technology.
This work was supported by the NICD of the National Health Laboratory Service and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cooperative agreement no. 6U01IP001048-04-02 awarded to C.C.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. C.C. received grant funds from US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Wellcome Trust, and South African Medical Research Council. N.W. and A.v.G. received grant funds from Sanofi and the Gates Foundation.
The investigators welcome enquiries about possible collaborations and requests for access to the dataset. Data will be shared after approval of a proposal and with a signed data access agreement. Investigators interested in more details about this study, or in accessing these resources, should contact the corresponding author.
Additional members of the PHIRST-C Group who contributed: Kgaugelo Patricia Kgasago, Linda de Gouveia, Maimuna Carrim, Mignon du Plessis, Retshidisitswe Kotane, and Tumelo Moloantoa.
- National Institute for Communicable Diseases. COVID-19 weekly epidemiology brief week 3. 2022 Jan 26 [cited 2022 Jan 31]. https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/COVID-19-Weekly-Epidemiology-Brief-week-3-2022.pdf
- Wolter N, Jassat W, Walaza S, Welch R, Moultrie H, Groome M, et al. Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study. Lancet. 2022;399:437–46. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleynhans J, Tempia S, Wolter N, von Gottberg A, Bhiman JN, Buys A, et al.; PHIRST-C Group. PHIRST-C Group. PHIRST-C Group. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a rural and urban household cohort during first and second waves of infections, South Africa, July 2020–March 2021. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:3020–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern. 2021 Nov 26 [cited 2022 Jan 5]. https://www.who.int/news/item/26-11-2021-classification-of-omicron-(b.1.1.529)-sars-cov-2-variant-of-concern
- Larremore DB, Fosdick BK, Bubar KM, Zhang S, Kissler SM, Metcalf CJE, et al. Estimating SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and epidemiological parameters with uncertainty from serological surveys. eLife. 2021;10:
e64206. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madhi SA, Kwatra G, Myers JE, Jassat W, Dhar N, Mukendi CK, et al. Population immunity and Covid-19 severity with Omicron variant in South Africa. N Engl J Med. 2022;NEJMoa2119658.
FigureCite This Article
Original Publication Date: March 23, 2022
1Additional members of the PHIRST-C group who contributed to this article are listed at the end of this article.
Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 5—May 2022
|EID Search Options|
|Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.|
|Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.|
|Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Jackie Kleynhans, Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, 1 Modderfontein Rd, Sandringham, 2192, Johannesburg, South Africa