Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 3—March 2023
Dispatch

Extended Viral Shedding of MERS-CoV Clade B Virus in Llamas Compared with African Clade C Strain

Author affiliations: Unitat Mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain (J. Rodon, N. Te, L. Pailler-García, G. Cantero, A. Bensaid, J. Vergara-Alert, J. Segalés); IRTA, Programa de Sanitat Animal, CReSA, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (J. Rodon, N. Te, L. Pailler-García, G. Cantero, A. Bensaid, J. Vergara-Alert); Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (A.Z. Mykytyn, N.M.A. Okba, M.M. Lamers, B.L. Haagmans); Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (I. Albulescu, B.-J. Bosch); The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (M. Peiris); Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (J. Segalés)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) clade B viruses are found in camelids and humans in the Middle East, but clade C viruses are not. We provide experimental evidence for extended shedding of MERS-CoV clade B viruses in llamas, which might explain why they outcompete clade C strains in the Arabian Peninsula.

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infections cause severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and even lethal disease in humans. High case-fatality rates are reported in the Middle East (1), where the virus is endemic and represents a major human health threat. Although major travel-associated outbreaks have occurred and nosocomial transmissions have been documented, MERS-CoV is primarily carried and transmitted to humans by dromedary camels, which are the natural reservoirs and main source of zoonotic events (2). All primary cases of MERS-CoV in humans reported during July–December 2021 occurred in persons who had been exposed to dromedary camels (3). Susceptible camelid species, such as dromedaries, llamas, and alpacas (4), as opposed to humans, do not experience severe disease upon MERS-CoV infection. Infection in camelids is characterized by upper respiratory tract replication, abundant infectious viral shedding, and high transmission potential (2). Furthermore, robust and transient innate immune responses in alpacas correlate with virus clearance in the respiratory epithelia (5,6).

High seroprevalences and active circulation of MERS-CoV have been determined in dromedary camels from the Arabian Peninsula and Africa (7). Although >80% of the global camel population is found in Africa (https://www.fao.org/faostat) and MERS-CoV infection is widespread in dromedaries in Africa, zoonotic disease has only been reported in the Arabian Peninsula. Serologic and molecular evidence of MERS-CoV infection in camel handlers exists (811), but no zoonotic transmission has been reported in Africa. Despite continuous trade of dromedaries into the Arabian Peninsula, African clade C MERS-CoV strains have not been detected in the region. One explanation for the dominance of clade B strains in the Middle East could be their increased fitness compared with African clade C viruses. A recent study demonstrated increased replication competence of MERS-CoV clade B Arabian viruses compared with different clade C African strains in human lung ex vivo cultures and in a transgenic mouse model expressing the human cell receptor for MERS-CoV (human dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [hDPP4]) (12). However, the replication and transmission competence of Arabian and African viruses in camelid reservoir species remains unknown.

The kinetics by which llamas shed infectious MERS-CoV are similar to those of dromedary camels, so they are considered a reliable surrogate model for transmission experiments (2,4). Therefore, we experimentally investigated transmission of MERS-CoV viruses in llamas.

The Study

We used a previously developed direct-contact model in which the transmission of a MERS-CoV clade B isolate (Qatar15/2015) was assessed in llamas (13,14). In brief, we kept a group of 5 llamas inside an experimental enclosure (Appendix Figure 1, panel A) to study the transmission capabilities of a MERS-CoV clade C isolate (MERS-CoV/Egypt2013) that was obtained from an infected dromedary (15). We inoculated 2 llamas with MERS-CoV and placed them in direct contact with 3 sentinels at 2 days postinoculation (dpi) (Appendix). We monitored clinical signs and body temperature and collected nasal swab specimens for virologic studies. In addition, we retrieved experimental data from MERS-CoV Qatar15/2015-inoculated and in-contact llamas (13,14) and performed comparative analyses.

We specifically selected the animals used in the transmission studies to be 6-to-10-month-old juveniles of similar geographic origin, sex, and health status background. All animal experimentation and MERS-CoV handling were conducted at the Biosafety Level 3 facilities of the Biocontainment Unit of IRTA CReSA (Barcelona, Spain). Animal handling and experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical and Animal Welfare Committee of IRTA and by the Ethical Commission of Animal Experimentation of the Autonomous Government of Catalonia (approval nos. FUE-2017–00561265 and CEA-OH/10942/1).

Figure 1

MERS-CoV RNA and infectious virus shedding in llamas experimentally infected with MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 (red) or Qatar15/2015 (blue) strains. A–C) Viral RNA and infectious MERS-CoV shedding of inoculated animals. Genomic (A) and subgenomic (B) viral RNA were quantified in nasal swab samples collected at different times after MERS-CoV inoculation. Infectious MERS-CoV titers (C) were demonstrated in nasal swab specimens collected on different days after MERS-CoV inoculation. Solid lines indicate mean values determined for different MERS-CoV–inoculated groups; shadings represents SD intervals. D–F) Infection profile of naive in-contact llamas). Genomic (D) and subgenomic (E) viral RNA quantified in nasal swab samples collected at different times after MERS-CoV inoculation. Infectious MERS-CoV titers (F) were demonstrated in nasal swab samples collected on different days after MERS-CoV inoculation. Solid lines indicate mean values of the groups of animals infected by contact; shaded areas represent SD intervals. Colored dashed lines indicate mean values calculated for MERS-CoV–inoculated animals. Horizontal dashed lines depict detection limits of assays. Cq, quantification cycle; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; TCID50, 50% tissue culture infective dose.

Figure 1. MERS-CoV RNA and infectious virus shedding in llamas experimentally infected with MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 (red) or Qatar15/2015 (blue) strains. A–C) Viral RNA and infectious MERS-CoV shedding of inoculated animals. Genomic (A)...

Rectal temperatures of all animals remained at basal levels (37°C–40°C), and no animals displayed clinical signs during the study. We detected no gross or microscopic lesions in the upper or lower respiratory tracts of any studied llama, independent of their experimental group. Animals inoculated with a high dose of either MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 (clade C) or Qatar15/2015 (clade B) had similar levels of genomic and subgenomic viral RNA in nasal swab specimens for 2 weeks (Figure 1, panels A, B). They also shed high titers of infectious virus during the first week after inoculation in a similar biphasic pattern (Figure 1, panel C), indicating that the doses used to inoculate the animals caused productive infection with both strains. Although viral shedding was comparable between both experimental groups, higher infectious titers were detected in Egypt/2013-inoculated llamas. The infection was characterized by a first peak of shedding at 2 dpi and a subsequent reduction in MERS-CoV viral loads, followed by a secondary peak before viral clearance.

Figure 2

Mixed model analyzing the transmission competence of each MERS-CoV strain over time in investigation of llamas experimentally infected with MERS-CoV. Boxplots show daily virus shedding of sentinel llamas infected with MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 (red) or Qatar15/2015 strains (blue) after direct exposure to inoculated llamas. A, B) Genomic (A) and subgenomic (B) viral RNA quantification in nasal swabs collected throughout the study. C) Infectious MERS-CoV titers. Only the time points considered in the mixed models are represented. Horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians; box tops and bottoms indicate interquartile ranges; error bars indicate 95% CIs; black dots indicate outliers. p values are indicated above the boxes; p values indicate statistical differences between areas under the curve of the experimental groups, as calculated by Wilcoxon test. Cq, quantification cycle; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; TCID50, 50% tissue culture infective dose.

Figure 2. Mixed model analyzing the transmission competence of each MERS-CoV strain over time in investigation of llamas experimentally infected with MERS-CoV. Boxplots show daily virus shedding of sentinel llamas infected with...

The African MERS-CoV isolate was transmitted to 2 of 3 in-contact animals in this study, as determined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (Figure 1, panels D, E), but infectious virus shedding in contact animals largely remained below threshold levels (Figure 1, panel F). Infectious MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 could only be isolated sporadically and at titers close to the limit of detection. In contrast, the Arabian MERS-CoV Qatar15/2015 isolate was transmitted to all direct-contact llamas, leading to productive infection (Figure 1, panels D–F). Of note, genomic and subgenomic MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 RNA was detected at lower levels and cleared faster in direct-contact llamas than in sentinels infected with the MERS-CoV Qatar15/2015 strain (Figure 1, panels D, E). In the remaining sentinel, a productive infection did not develop, but the animal was naturally exposed to MERS-CoV Egypt/2013, as indicated by traces of genomic RNA in NS at 3–7, 10, and 12 dpi (cycle quantitation values >37) and development of serum neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) to MERS-CoV (Appendix Figure 2). Subgenomic RNA analyses indicated no evidence for either viral replication or shedding in this llama throughout the study. Statistical analyses in sentinel animals showed a significant reduction in MERS-CoV Egypt/2013 replication and shedding period compared with those observed in llamas exposed to MERS-CoV Qatar15/2015 strain (Figure 2). Regardless of the MERS-CoV strain investigated, nAbs were detected starting at 2 weeks after infection in all inoculated animals and in-contact sentinels (Appendix Figure 2). We did not find statistical differences in serum nAb levels among experimental groups.

Altogether, our data demonstrated transmission of both MERS-CoV strains, which resulted in decreased viral replication and shedding capabilities of the Egypt/2013 strain compared with the Qatar15/2015 strain in sentinel llamas infected by contact. Therefore, the Egypt/2013 strain might have a lower potential of transmission than the Qatar15/2015 strain.

Conclusions

The results of our experimental investigation might explain why MERS-CoV clade C strains have not been established in the Arabian Peninsula after being introduced through imported camels and competing with enzootic clade B viruses. However, further studies are needed to determine whether this potentially reduced transmissibility is a common feature of the diverse MERS-CoV lineages found in dromedaries in Africa. Specific amino acid substitutions in the spike protein or in other genomic regions of African clade C viruses might be determinant of the low replication phenotype observed in the in-contact animals in our study, as has been previously observed in human cells (12). However, viral or host factors that play a key role in conferring replication and transmission competence remain to be explored in camelid reservoirs. High MERS-CoV genome stability was previously described in llamas infected with the Qatar15/2015 strain (13). Thus, eventual mutations arising from animals infected with the Egypt/2013 strain were not expected, and no sequencing was performed in those infected animals. Nonetheless, our study provides in vivo experimental data demonstrating reduced MERS-CoV fitness of 1 African clade C isolate to in-contact camelids compared with an Arabian clade B isolate. In addition, reduced MERS-CoV shedding from infected camelids might limit spillover to humans. Introducing MERS-CoV clade B strains to Africa through infected camelids must be avoided, because these strains might outcompete African MERS-CoV clade C strains and pose a greater zoonotic and pandemic threat in Africa.

Dr. Rodon conducted his doctoral research at the Animal Health Department of IRTA-CReSA, Barcelona, Spain. His primary research interest is reemerging viral zoonotic diseases with pandemic potential, with particular focus on the One Health approach.

Top

Acknowledgment

This study was performed as part of the Zoonotic Anticipation and Preparedness Initiative (ZAPI project) (Innovative Medicines initiative [IMI] grant 115760), with assistance and financial support from IMI and the European Commission and contributions from EFPIA partners. J.R. was partially supported by the VetBioNet project (EU Grant Agreement INFRA-2016-1 Nº731014) and the crowdfunding initiative #Yomecorono, available online at https://www.yomecorono.com (accessed on June 16, 2022). IRTA is supported by CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya.

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. MERS situation update—August 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 15]. https://applications.emro.who.int/docs/WHOEMCSR451E-eng.pdf
  2. Te  N, Ciurkiewicz  M, van den Brand  JMA, Rodon  J, Haverkamp  A-K, Vergara-Alert  J, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in camelids. Vet Pathol. 2022;59:54655. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization Of the United Nations. MERS-CoV situation update. 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 15]. https://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/empres/mers/situation_update.html
  4. Vergara-Alert  J, Vidal  E, Bensaid  A, Segalés  J. Searching for animal models and potential target species for emerging pathogens: Experience gained from Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus. One Health. 2017;3:3440. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Te  N, Rodon  J, Ballester  M, Pérez  M, Pailler-García  L, Segalés  J, et al. Type I and III IFNs produced by the nasal epithelia and dimmed inflammation are features of alpacas resolving MERS-CoV infection. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009229. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Te  N, Rodon  J, Pérez  M, Segalés  J, Vergara-Alert  J, Bensaid  A. Enhanced replication fitness of MERS-CoV clade B over clade A strains in camelids explains the dominance of clade B strains in the Arabian Peninsula. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;1–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Reusken  CBEM, Messadi  L, Feyisa  A, Ularamu  H, Godeke  G-J, Danmarwa  A, et al. Geographic distribution of MERS coronavirus among dromedary camels, Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:13704. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Munyua  PM, Ngere  I, Hunsperger  E, Kochi  A, Amoth  P, Mwasi  L, et al. Low-level Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus among camel handlers, Kenya, 2019. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:12015. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Liljander  A, Meyer  B, Jores  J, Müller  MA, Lattwein  E, Njeru  I, et al. MERS-CoV antibodies in humans, Africa, 2013–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:10869. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kiyong’a  AN, Cook  EAJ, Okba  NMA, Kivali  V, Reusken  C, Haagmans  BL, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) seropositive camel handlers in Kenya. Viruses. 2020;12:396. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mok  CKP, Zhu  A, Zhao  J, Lau  EHY, Wang  J, Chen  Z, et al. T-cell responses to MERS coronavirus infection in people with occupational exposure to dromedary camels in Nigeria: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:38595. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhou  Z, Hui  KPY, So  RTY, Lv  H, Perera  RAPM, Chu  DKW, et al. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of MERS coronaviruses from Africa to understand their zoonotic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2103984118. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rodon  J, Okba  NMA, Te  N, van Dieren  B, Bosch  B-J, Bensaid  A, et al. Blocking transmission of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in llamas by vaccination with a recombinant spike protein. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:1593603. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodon  J, Mykytyn  AZ, Cantero  G, Albulescu  IC, Bosch  BJ, Brix  A, et al. Protective efficacy of an RBD-based Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) particle vaccine in llamas. One Health Outlook. 2022;4:12. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chu  DKW, Poon  LLM, Gomaa  MM, Shehata  MM, Perera  RAPM, Abu Zeid  D, et al. MERS coronaviruses in dromedary camels, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:104953. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2903.220986

Original Publication Date: February 07, 2023

1Current affiliation: The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 3—March 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Bart L. Haagmans, Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: January 04, 2023
Page updated: February 20, 2023
Page reviewed: February 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external