Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 3—March 2023
Dispatch

Risk Factors for Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant among Previously Infected Frontline Workers

Katherine D. EllingsonComments to Author , James Hollister, Cynthia J. Porter, Sana M. Khan, Leora R. Feldstein, Allison L. Naleway, Manjusha Gaglani, Alberto J. Caban-Martinez, Harmony L. Tyner, Ashley A. Lowe, Lauren E.W. Olsho, Jennifer Meece, Sarang K. Yoon, Josephine Mak, Jennifer L. Kuntz, Natasha Schaefer Solle, Karley Respet, Zoe Baccam, Meredith G. Wesley, Matthew S. Thiese, Young M. Yoo, Marilyn J. Odean, Flavia N. Miiro, Steve L. Pickett, Andrew L. Phillips, Lauren Grant, James K. Romine, Meghan K. Herring, Kurt T. Hegmann, Julie Mayo Lamberte, Brian Sokol, Krystal S. Jovel, Mark G. Thompson, Patrick Rivers, Tamara Pilishvili, Karen Lutrick, Jefferey L. Burgess, Claire M. Midgley, and Ashley L. Fowlkes
Author affiliations: University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA (K.D. Ellingson, J. Hollister, C.J. Porter, S.M. Khan, A.A. Lowe, Z. Baccam, F.N. Miiro, J.K. Romine, K.S. Jovel, P. Rivers, K. Lutrick, J.L. Burgess); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (L.R. Feldstein, J. Mak, Y.M. Yoo, J. Mayo Lamberte, M.G. Thompson, T. Pilishvili, C.M. Midgley, A.L. Fowlkes); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA (A.L. Naleway, J.L. Kuntz); B; aylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas, USA (M. Gaglani); A.J. Caban-Martinez, N. Schaefer Solle); St. Luke’s Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA (H.L. Tyner, K. Respet, M.J. Odean); Abt Associates Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA (L.E.W. Olsho, M.G. Wesley, S.L. Pickett, M.K. Herring, B. Sokol); Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA (J. Meece); University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (S.K. Yoon, M.S. Thiese, A.L. Phillips, K.T. Hegmann)

Main Article

Table

Composition of study sample at risk for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 during Omicron predominance, United States, December 2021‒April 2022*

Characteristic No. participants, n = 1,530† No. reinfected, n = 318 No. person-days at risk, n = 124,665 Reinfection incidence/1,000 days at risk (95% CI) Unadjusted HR (95% CI)‡ Adjusted HR
(95% CI)§
Site, no. (%)
Tucson, AZ 579 (37.8) 109 47,933 2.27 (1.85‒2.70) Referent Referent
Phoenix, AZ 211 (13.8) 40 17,054 2.35 (1.62‒3.07) 1.03 (0.72‒1.49) 0.99 (0.66‒1.48)
Other areas in AZ 123 (8.0) 21 10,389 2.02 (1.16‒2.89) 0.88 (0.56‒1.42) 0.75 (0.46‒1.35)
Temple, TX 93 (6.1) 20 8,003 2.50 (1.40‒3.59) 1.15 (0.71‒1.85) 1.12 (0.68‒1.82)
Portland, OR 59 (3.9) 9 4,851 1.86 (0.64‒3.07) 0.84 (0.42‒1.65) 0.99 (0.48‒2.01)
Miami, FL 151 (9.9) 43 11,834 3.63 (2.55‒4.72) 1.66 (1.17‒2.37) 1.28 (0.86‒1.91)
Duluth, MN 135 (8.8) 24 11,271 2.13 (1.28‒2.98) 0.92 (0.59‒1.43) 1.08 (0.67‒1.74)
Salt Lake City, UT
179 (11.7)
52
13,330
3.90 (2.84‒4.96)
1.65 (1.19‒2.30)
1.61 (1.09‒ 2.37)
Age category, y, no. (%)
18–34 360 (23.5) 83 28,112 2.95 (2.32‒3.59) Referent Referent
35–49 662 (43.3) 135 54,065 2.50 (2.08‒2.92) 0.86 (0.66‒1.13) 0.88 (0.65‒1.20)
50–77
508 (33.2)
100
42,488
2.35 (1.89‒2.81)
0.82 (0.61‒1.10)
0.89 (0.63‒1.27)
Sex, no. (%)
M 605 (39.5) 144 47,929 3.00 (2.51‒3.50) Referent Referent
F
925 (60.5)
174
76,736
2.27 (1.93‒2.60)
0.76 (0.61‒0.95)
0.95 (0.72‒1.25)
Race/ethnicity, no. (%)¶#
Non-Hispanic/White 1,023 (66.9) 197 84,350 2.34 (2.01‒2.66) Referent Referent
Non-Hispanic/Black 44 (2.9) 15 3,058 4.91 (2.42‒7.39) 2.02 (1.19‒3.41) 2.14 (1.17‒3.92)
Non-Hispanic/Asian 30 (2.0) 5 2,636 1.90 (0.23‒3.56) 0.81 (0.33‒1.96) 1.02 (0.43‒2.43)
Hispanic 375 (24.9) 88 29,837 2.95 (2.33‒3.57) 1.26 (0.98‒1.62) 1.30 (0.98‒1.72)
Other
18 (1.2)
3
1,605
1.87 (0.00‒3.98)
0.81 (0.26‒2.56)
0.56 (0.18‒1.78)
Comorbid conditions, no. (%)#**
0 970 (63.4) 206 78,492 2.62 (2.27‒2.98) Referent Referent
>1
489 (32.0)
106
39,704
2.67 (2.16‒3.18)
1.02 (0.80‒1.29)
1.17 (0.90‒1.53)
Occupation, no. (%)††
Heathcare personnel 650 (42.5) 126 53,745 2.34 (1.94‒2.75) Referent Referent
First responder 400 (26.1) 111 30,557 3.63 (2.96‒4.31) 1.52 (1.18‒1.96) 1.13 (0.78‒1.63)
Other essential worker
480 (31.4)
81
40,363
2.01 (1.57‒2.44)
0.86 (0.65‒1.13)
0.82 (0.60‒1.13)
Time-varying vaccination status, no.‡‡
0 doses 441 125 32,879 3.80 (3.14‒4.47) Referent Referent
1 dose 34 5 2,605 1.92 (0.24‒3.60) 0.56 (0.22‒1.40) 0.56 (0.22‒1.42)
2 doses 646 107 48,039 2.23 (1.81‒2.65) 0.58 (0.45‒0.75) 0.57 (0.43‒0.75)
3 doses
513
81
42,726
1.90 (1.48‒2.31)
0.55 (0.41‒0.72)
0.54 (0.39‒0.75)
Mask use in community, no. (%)#§§
Above mean (47%) 766 (50.1) 126 64,630 1.95 (1.61‒2.29) Referent Referent
Below mean
735 (48.0)
189
57,595
3.28 (2.81‒3.75)
1.64 (1.31‒2.06)
1.39 (1.07‒1.82)
Weekly work hours, no. (%)#
Below mean (30 hours) 781 (51.0) 154 64,077 2.40 (2.02‒2.78) Referent Referent
Above mean
741 (48.5)
164
59,901
2.74 (2.32‒3.16)
1.14 (0.91‒1.41)
1.09 (0.87‒1.37)
Time elapsed since first infection, y, no. (%)
<1 781 (51.0) 133 65,239 2.04 (1.69‒2.39) Referent Referent
>1 749 (49.0) 185 59,426 3.13 (2.66‒3.56) 1.53 (1.23‒1.91) 1.63 (1.28‒2.07)

*HR, hazard ratio. †Column percentage reported. ‡Each covariate listed was entered into a Cox proportional hazard model as a single predictor to generate unadjusted hazard ratios §All covariates were entered into a fully adjusted model. ¶Other includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, or multiracial. #Missing values for this variable but <5% of study sample; persons who had missing values were excluded from hazard ratio analyses. **Includes asthma, other chronic lung disease, cancer, diabetes, heart disease or condition, hypertension, immunosuppression, kidney disease, liver disease, neurologic disease or disorder, autoimmune disease, or other medical problem requiring clinical care for >6 months. ††Includes inpatient, ambulatory, and institutional healthcare personnel; First responders include nonfire emergency medical service workers, fire services, law enforcement and corrections personnel; other essential workers include persons who work in the hospitality, retail, food service, education, government, or grocery sectors and persons who work in essential infrastructure and operations. 
‡‡Vaccination status was allowed to vary over the time period at risk by using the Andersen–Gill extension methods; column percentages are not provided because they do not add up to 100%. 
§§Refers to the reported percentage of time masks were worn while in public but not at work in the past 7 days averaged across the study period.

Main Article

Page created: December 28, 2022
Page updated: February 20, 2023
Page reviewed: February 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external