Volume 5, Number 5—October 1999
Research
The Economic Impact of Pandemic Influenza in the United States: Priorities for Intervention
Table 3
Outcome category item | Type of cost | Age group (yrs) |
Sources | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-19 | 20-64 | 65+ | |||
Deaths | |||||
Average age (years) | 9 | 35 | 74 | Assumed | |
PV earnings lost ($)a | Indirect | 1,016,101 | 1,037,673 | 65,837 | 16, 30 |
Most likely + min or maxhospital costs ($)b | Direct | 3,435 +2,632 | 7,605 +3,888 | 8,309 +3,692 | Marketscan Database; 31. |
Subtotal ($)c | 1,019,536 | 1,045,278 | 74,146 | ||
Hospitalizations | |||||
Most likely + min or maxhospital costs ($)b | Direct | 2,936 +2,099 | 6,016 +2,086 | 6,856 +3,200 | Marketscan Database; 31. |
Most likely + min or max net pay for outpatient visits ($)d | Direct | 74 + 40 | 94 + 70 | 102 + 60 | Marketscan Database; 31. |
Avg. copayment for outpatient visit ($) | Direct | 5 | 4 | 4 | Marketscan Database |
Most likely + min or max net payment for drug claims($)e | Direct | 26 + 9 | 42 + 30 | 41 + 10 | Marketscan Database |
Most likely + min or max days lostf | Indirect | 5 + 2.7 | 8 + 4.8 | 10 +5.4 | Marketscan Database; 31. |
Value 1 day lost ($)g | Indirect | 65 | 100 or 65 | 65 | 30 |
Subtotal ($)c | 3,366 | 6,842 | 7,653 | ||
Outpatient visits | |||||
Avg. no. visitsh | Direct | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.52 | Marketscan Database |
Most likely + min or max net payment per visit($)i | Direct | 49 +13 | 38 + 12 | 50 + 16 | Marketscan Database |
Avg. copayment for outpatient visit ($) | Direct | 5 | 4 | 4 | Marketscan Database |
Most likely + min or max net payment per prescription($)j | Direct | 25 + 18 | 36 + 27 | 36 + 22 | Marketscan Database |
Avg. prescriptions per visit | Direct | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.4 | Marketscan Database |
Avg. copayment per prescription ($) | Direct | 3 | 3 | 3 | Marketscan Database |
Days lost | Indirect | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4,5 |
Value 1 day lost ($)g | Indirect | 65 | 100 | 65 | 30 |
Subtotal ($)c | 300 | 330 | 458 | ||
Ill, no medical care sought | |||||
Days lost | Indirect | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4,5 |
Value 1 day lost ($)g | Indirect | 65 | 100 | 65 | 30 |
Over-the-counter drugs ($) | Direct | 2 | 2 | 2 | Assumed |
Subtotal ($)c | 197 | 202 | 327 |
aAverage present value (PV), using a 3% discount rate, of expected future lifetime earnings and housekeeping services, weighted by age and gender (30) and adjusted to 1995 dollars (by multiplying by a factor of 1.07) (16).
bMost likely, with + defining the minimum and maximum costs for a triangular distribution (18) for Monte Carlo analysis (13-15). The values were calculated by using cost data from Marketscan Database (The MEDSTAT Group, Ann Arbor, MI) and multiplying it by a hospital cost-to-charge ratio of 0.53. The latter ratio is a weighted average of the urban and rural (urban = 0.80, rural = 0.20) cost-to-charge ratios calculated by the Health Care Finance Administration for August 1996 (31).
cSubtotals are the totals for each category of outcome, using the most likely estimates.
dMost likely, with minimum and maximum values of net payments for outpatient visits up to 14 days before admission date and up to 30 days after discharge date.
eNet payment for drug claims associated with outpatient visits up to 14 days before admission and up to 30 days after discharge.
fMost likely, with + defining the minimum and maximum days lost due to hospitalization for a triangular distribution (18) for Monte Carlo analysis (13-15). Calculated using length of stay in hospital data from Marketscan Database (The MEDSTAT Group, Ann Arbor, MI) and adding a total of one additional day for convalescence and pre- and posthospitalization outpatient visits for 0-19 and 20-64 years of age. For 65 + years, two additional days were added to length of stay in hospital for convalescence and pre- and posthospitalization outpatient visits.
gFor 0-19 and 65+ years age groups, a day lost to influenza was valued as equivalent to an unspecified day (30), denoting a value for time lost by care givers and family members related to taking care of a patient in these age groups. For 20-64 years of age, 60% of days lost due to hospitalizations and related convalescence and pre- and posthospitalization outpatient visits were valued as day off work ($100/day). The remaining 40% of days lost were valued as unspecified days ($65/day). For 20-64 years of age, when patients were not hospitalized at any point during their illness (i.e., outpatient status), all days lost were assumed days off work ($100/day).
hThe number of visits per episode of influenza is an average across all age groups. From the database, it was found that 85% of all patients had less than three outpatient visits, with an average of 1.52 visits (Appendix 2).
iMost likely, with minimum and maximum values of net payments for outpatient visits without any specified association to hospitalizations.
jMost likely, with + defining the minimum and maximum cost per prescription, with the number of prescriptions per visit.
References
- Patriarca PA, Cox NJ. Influenza pandemic preparedness plan for the United States. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(Suppl 1):S4–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simonsen L, Clarke MJ, Schonberger LB, Arden NH, Cox NJ, Fukuda K. Pandemic versus epidemic influenza mortality: a pattern of changing age distribution. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:53–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Office of Technology Assessment. U.S. Congress. Cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination. Washington: Government Printing Office; 1981.
- Kavet J. A perspective on the significance of pandemic influenza. Am J Public Health. 1977;67:1063–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Campbell DS, Rumley MA. Cost-effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in a healthy, working-age population. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:408–14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrat F, Valleron A-J. Influenza mortality among the elderly in France, 1980-90: how many deaths may have been avoided through vaccination? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:419–25. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riddiough MA, Sisk JE, Bell JC. Influenza vaccination: cost-effectiveness and public policy. JAMA. 1983;249:3189–95. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patriarca PA, Arden NH, Koplan JP, Goodman RA. Prevention and control of type A influenza infections in nursing homes: benefits and costs of four approaches using vaccination and amantadine. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:732–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoenbaum SC. Economic impact of influenza: the individuals perspective. Am J Med. 1987;82(Supp 6A):26–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jefferson T, Demicheli V. Socioeconomics of influenza. In: Nicholson KG, Webster RG, Hay AJ, editors. Textbook of influenza. London (UK): Blackwell Science; 1998. p. 541-7.
- Schoenbaum SC, McNeil BJ, Kavet J. The swine-influenza decision. N Engl J Med. 1976;295:759–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cliff AD, Haggett P. Statistical modelling of measles and influenza outbreaks. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2:43–73. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Critchfield GC, Willard KE. Probabilistic analysis of decision trees using Monte Carlo simulation. Med Decis Making. 1986;6:85–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dobilet P, Begg CB, Weinstein MC, Braun P, McNeil BJ. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation: a practical approach. Med Decis Making. 1985;5:157–77. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dittus RS, Roberts SD, Wilson JR. Quantifying uncertainty in medical decisions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:23A–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States: 1997. 117th ed. Washington: The Bureau; 1997.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(RR-6):1–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B. Statistical distributions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1993.
- Glezen PW. Emerging infections: pandemic influenza. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:64–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullooly JP, Barker WH. Impact of type A influenza on children: a retrospective study. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:1008–16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barker WH, Mullooly JP. Impact of epidemic type A influenza in a defined adult population. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112:798–813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simonsen L, Clarke MJ, Williamson GD, Stroup DF, Arden NH, Schonberger LB. The impact of influenza epidemics on mortality: introducing a severity index. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1944–50. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fox JP, Hall CE, Cooney MK, Foy HM. Influenzavirus infections in Seattle families, 1975-1979. I. Study design, methods and the occurrence of infections by time and age. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116:212–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glezen WP, Decker M, Joseph SW, Mercready RG. Acute respiratory disease associated with influenza epidemics in Houston, 1981-1983. J Infect Dis. 1987;155:1119–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serfling RE. Sherman Il, Houseworth WJ. Excess pneumonia-influenza mortality by age and sex in three major influenza A2 epidemics, United States, 1957-58, 1960 and 1963. Am J Epidemiol. 1967;86:433–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barker WH, Mullooly JP. Pneumonia and influenza deaths during epidemics: implications for prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:85–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glezen WP, Payne AA, Snyder DN, Downs TD. Mortality and influenza. J Infect Dis. 1982;146:313–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McBean AM, Babish JD, Warren JL. The impact and cost of influenza in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2105–11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barker WH. Excess pneumonia and influenza associated hospitalization during influenza epidemics in the United States, 1970-78. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:761–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Shaffer PA, Dunet DO. Prevention effectiveness. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
- Fed Regist. 1996;61:46301–2.
- Kaufmann AF, Meltzer MI, Schmid GP. The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:83–94. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson LJ, Barry PJ. The competitive firm's response to risk. New York: Macmillian; 1987.
- Neustadt RE, Fineberg HV. The swine flu affair: decision making on a slippery disease. Washington: U.S. Department of Health Education, and Welfare; 1978.