Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001
West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus

Fatal Encephalitis and Myocarditis in Young Domestic Geese (Anser anser domesticus) Caused by West Nile Virus

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
David E. Swayne*Comments to Author , Joan R. Beck*, Calandra S. Smith†, Wun-Ju Shieh†, and Sharif R. Zaki†
Author affiliations: *U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, USA; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article


During 1999 and 2000, a disease outbreak of West Nile (WN) virus occurred in humans, horses, and wild and zoological birds in the northeastern USA. In our experiments, WN virus infection of young domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus) caused depression, weight loss, torticollis, opisthotonus, and death with accompanying encephalitis and myocarditis. Based on this experimental study and a field outbreak in Israel, WN virus is a disease threat to young goslings and viremia levels are potentially sufficient to infect mosquitoes and transmit WN virus to other animal species.

West Nile (WN) virus belongs to the family Flaviviridae in the Japanese encephalitis (JE) serocomplex group and is transmitted through various species of adult Culex mosquitos to a variety of mammals and birds (1). WN virus was not recognized in North America until the fall of 1999, when an epizootic began with the death of a wild American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) in New York (2); an additional 194 deaths in wild birds were confirmed with WN virus infections that fall (2). Most birds that died were from the order Passeriformes; corvids (crows and jays) accounted for >80% of deaths (1). Simultaneously, WN virus emerged as a cause of 62 cases of encephalitis with seven fatalities in humans (3) and 25 cases of neurologic disease in horses in New York City or on Long Island (1).

WN virus has not affected commercial chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) or turkeys (Meleagridis gallopavo), which are predominantly raised indoors with low potential for exposure to mosquito vectors (2). Furthermore, experimental studies in chickens and turkeys inoculated subcutaneously with a New York WN virus isolate had low viremia titers and no clinical disease (4,5). However, natural WN virus infections were associated with severe neurologic signs and death in 160 of 400 8- to 10-week-old domestic geese from a flock in Israel (6). The role of domestic geese as a WN virus reservoir in the Israel outbreak is unknown, but goose infection rates in the Sindbis District of the northern Nile Valley were 27%, similar to rates in buffed-back herons (Bubulcus ibis ibis), doves (Streptopelia senegalensis senegalensis), and domesticated pigeons (Columbia livia) and twice the rate in domesticated chickens and ducks (Anas platyrhynchos), suggesting that geese may have a role in local WN virus ecology (7). The U.S. WN virus is closely related to WN virus isolates obtained from humans with encephalitis in Romania (1996) and geese in Israel (1998) (8,9). We report the experimental reproduction of neurologic disease and death in young domestic geese with a WN virus isolated from an American crow on Long Island.

The Study

Four 2-week-old Embden geese were needle-inoculated subcutaneously with 103.3 mean tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of Vero cell culture propagated WN virus strain 9/99. A similar dosage was used in previous pathogenesis experiments to infect chickens and turkeys (4,5). The goslings were housed in a Biosafety Level 3 agriculture facility (10). Two uninoculated goslings were maintained in contact with the WN virus-inoculated group and two sham-inoculated controls were maintained in isolation.


Thumbnail of Two-week-old goslings that were subcutaneously inoculated with 9/99 New York strain of WN virus. (A) Abnormal posture of the head 10 days postinoculation (PI) (#80). The gosling had rhythmic side-to-side movement of the head. Bar = 2.5 cm. (B) Severe nonsuppurative encephalitis at 10 days PI (#80). HE stain. Bar = 50 µm. (C) Severe diffuse myocarditis with edema and myocyte necrosis at 6 days PI (#86). HE stain. Bar = 50 µm. (D) Flaviviral antigens in degenerating myocytes and macro

Figure. . Two-week-old goslings that were subcutaneously inoculated with 9/99 New York strain of WN virus. (A) Abnormal posture of the head 10 days postinoculation (PI) (#80). The gosling had rhythmic side-to-side...

During the 21-day study, the four WN virus-inoculated geese lost weight, had decreased activity, and were depressed. WN virus-inoculated gosling #80 had intermittent torticollis and opisthotonus and rhythmic side-to-side movement of the head (Figure) and was euthanized 10 days postinoculation (PI) for persistent neurologic signs. Goslings #6 and #86 died 5 and 6 days PI, respectively (Table). On postmortem examination, gosling #86 had subcutaneous hemorrhage around the joints, pale lungs, and petechial hemorrhages in the splenic capsule. Gosling #80 was dehydrated, lacked abdominal body fat, and had a pale beak, enlarged gall bladder, severe thymic and cloacal bursa atrophy, and excess cerebrospinal fluid. All remaining goslings were euthanized 21 days PI and lacked lesions. Goslings #6 and #86 had the most severe histologic lesions, including moderate nonsuppurative meningoencephalitis (Figure) with occasional apoptotic astrocytes, severe diffuse heterophilic (purulent) to lymphocytic myocarditis (Figure) with edema and myocyte necrosis, and vacuolation and apoptosis of pancreatic acinar cells. Gosling #80 had severe meninogencephalitis with necrosis of astrocytes and microglial cells, edema, and microgliosis; lymphohistiocytic choroiditis, uveitis, and inflammation of pecten oculi, the protruding vascular structure in the posterior vitreous; and heterophilic (purulent) scleritis and keratitis. WN virus was isolated from brain, heart, kidney, and intestine of goslings in the WN virus-inoculated group (Table). The virus titers were highest in #6, which died 5 days PI; intermediate in #86, which died 6 days PI; and lowest in #80, which was euthanized 10 days PI. WN virus was not isolated from any goslings sampled at the end of the experiment.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) assay, based on a two-step indirect immunoalkaline phosphatase technique described previously (11), was performed on multiple organs of goslings. The primary antibody used in the assay was a mouse polyclonal antibody that cross-reacts with several members of JE serocomplex group flavivirus, including JE virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, and WN virus. Brain tissues from human JE- and WN virus-confirmed cases (positive controls) and from an unrelated human patient (negative control) were run in parallel. Immunostaining of flaviviral antigens was demonstrated in heart, brain, pancreas, kidney, and autonomic ganglion cells of the intestine (Figure) in WN virus-inoculated goslings, but the distribution and intensity varied with individual WN virus-inoculated goslings.

WN virus was isolated from plasma samples of WN virus-inoculated goslings collected between 1 and 5 days PI, with highest titers 2 and 3 days PI (Table). WN virus was isolated from oropharyngeal swabs on single sampling days in three of four WN virus-inoculated goslings but in low titers (<101.5/0.1 mL). One in-contact gosling (an uninoculated gosling in contact with a WN virus-inoculated gosling) developed transient low-level viremia on 10 days PI (Table). No WN virus was isolated from cloacal swabs of WN virus-inoculated and in-contact goslings. Sham-control goslings were WN virus-free and negative on plaque reduction neutralization assay for anti-WN virus antibodies. WN virus-inoculated goslings had anti-WN virus antibodies 5,7,10, 14, and 21 days PI, and anti-WN virus antibodies were present in one in-contact gosling 14 and 21 days PI.

In the field, the incidence and outcome of WN virus infection vary with the host species. Wild birds are the primary reservoir hosts and, in WN virus-endemic areas, prevalence rates vary from 10% to 53% (12). Seroprevalence studies have identified natural infection in poultry species including broiler chickens and breeders, turkeys, breeder geese, and various species of pigeons in Israel, but veterinary medical investigations identified no associated disease or deaths except in pigeons (Y. Weisman, pers. comm.). However, WN virus infection has been associated with meningoencephalitis, clinical neurologic disease, and myocarditis in young domestic geese (6). The clinical and pathologic features of natural WN virus infections were reproduced in the current study. In humans, infections have usually been asymptomatic, but occasionally illness and death have resulted, accompanied by meningoencephalitis, anterior myelitis, acute pancreatitis, and myocarditis (12). During the 1999 New York outbreak of WN virus, histopathologic examination of central nervous system tissues from four fatal human cases showed varying degrees of neuronal necrosis, with infiltrates of microglia and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, perivascular cuffing, neuronal degeneration, and neuronophagia. IHC assay demonstrated immunostaining of flaviviral antigens in neurons, neuronal processes, and areas of necrosis. No immunostaining was seen in other major organs, including lung, liver, spleen, and kidney. The histopathologic lesions and immunostaining were more prominent in the brain stem and spinal cord (13). Similarly, various animal models, such as mice, hamsters, and rhesus monkeys, have developed fatal encephalitis upon intracerebral inoculation of WN virus (12). In natural cases of WN virus in zoologic birds representing 14 different species and eight orders, deaths were associated with severe myocarditis and encephalitis, and flaviviral antigen was demonstrated in cardiac myocytes and neurons (2,14). Findings from natural cases and experimental studies in various birds and mammals suggest common pathogenic effects of WN virus infections are caused by apoptotic or necrotic cell death in parenchymal cells of the brain, heart, and pancreas.


In our study, subcutaneous inoculation with a New York WN virus isolate produced clinical signs of depression, weight loss, torticollis, opisthotonus, and death in 2-week-old domestic geese, similar to disease in reported field cases. Transient viremia developed 1 to 5 days PI with peak viremia titers (104-6) 2 days PI. Experimental studies in 1- to 11-day-old chicks demonstrated acquisition of infection from mosquitos, and the resulting viremia titers (104-6.3) efficiently infected naive mosquitoes (7). However, after 3 weeks of age, chickens were refractory to infection by mosquitos, and the resulting low viremia titers were inefficient in infecting mosquitoes (7). In contrast, the peak viremia titers (104-6) in goslings of the current study were of sufficient magnitude to efficiently infect mosquitos and serve as a reservoir and amplifying host. Furthermore, serologic and virologic data indicated that transmission of WN virus between goslings is possible without a mosquito vector, i.e., by direct contact. In contrast to geese, experimental WN virus infections did not produce clinical disease in chickens and turkeys, and the viremia levels were lower than occurred in the goslings (4,5). WN virus was not directly transmitted to in-contact chickens or turkeys. In addition to various wild birds species of the order Passiformes, young domestic geese can be a reservoir and amplifying host for WN virus and could contribute to the emerging ecology of WN virus in North America.

Dr. Swayne is a veterinary pathologist and director of the Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. His research focuses on pathobiology and control of exotic and emerging viral diseases of poultry and other birds, principally highly pathogenic avian influenza and West Nile virus.



We thank L. Perkins and L. Turpin for providing technical assistance and E. Ostlund and D. Senne for providing the challenge WN virus isolate and suggestions on laboratory assays.



  1. Komar  N. West Nile viral encephalitis. Rev Sci Tech. 2000;19:16676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Office International des Epizooties. West Nile fever in the United States of America: in horses. Disease Information. 2000;13:1501.
  3. Rappole  JH, Derrickson  SR, Hubalek  Z. Migratory birds and spread of West Nile Virus in the Western hemisphere. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:31928. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Swayne  DE, Beck  JR, Zaki  SR. Pathogenicity of West Nile virus for turkeys. Avian Dis. 2000;44:9327. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Senne  DA, Pedersen  JC, Taylor  WD, Hutto  DL, Panigrahy  B. Pathogencity of West Nile virus for chickens. Avian Dis. 2000;44:6429. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Office International des Epizooties. West Nile fever in Israel in geese. Disease Information. 1999;12:166.
  7. Taylor  RM, Work  TH, Hurlbut  HS, Rizk  F. A study of ecology of the West Nile virus in Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1956;5:579620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lanciotti  RS, Roehrig  JT, Deubel  V, Smith  J, Parker  M, Steele  K, Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science. 1999;286:23337. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson  JF, Andreadis  TG, Vossbrinck  CR, Tirrell  S, Wakem  EM, French  RA, Isolation of West Nile virus from mosquitoes, crows, and a Cooper's hawk in Connecticut. Science. 1999;286:23313. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbeito  MS, Abraham  G, Best  M, Cairns  P, Langevin  P, Sterritt  WG, Recommended biocontainment features for research and diagnostic facilities where animal pathogens are used. Rev Sci Tech. 1995;14:8737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zaki  SR, Greer  PW, Coffield  LM, Goldsmith  CS, Nolte  KB, Foucar  K, Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Pathogenesis of an emerging infectious disease. Am J Pathol. 1995;146:55279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Malik-Peiris  JS, Amerasinghe  FP. West Nile fever. In: Beran GW, Steele JH, editors. Handbook of Zoonoses Section B: Viral. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1994. p. 139-48.
  13. Shieh  WJ, Guarner  J, Layton  M, Fine  A, Miller  J, Nash  D, The role of pathology in an investigation of an outbreak of West Nile encephalitis in New York, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:3702. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Steele  KE, Linn  MJ, Schoepp  RJ, Komar  N, Geisbert  TW, Manduca  RM, Pathology of fatal West Nile virus infections in native and exotic birds during the 1999 outbreak in New York City. Vet Pathol. 2000;37:20824. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0704.017429

Table of Contents – Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David E. Swayne, USDA, ARS, SEPRL, 934 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605, USA; fax: 706-546-3161

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.