Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001

Nipah Virus Infection Among Military Personnel Involved in Pig Culling during an Outbreak of Encephalitis in Malaysia, 1998-1999

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: An outbreak of severe encephalitis affecting 265 patients, 104 (40%) of whom died, occurred during 1998-1999 in Malaysia. It was linked to a new paramyxovirus, Nipah virus, which infects pigs, humans, dogs, and cats (1-4). Nipah virus is most closely related to Hendra virus (4), which was discovered in Australia in 1994 during an outbreak of severe respiratory disease among horses and humans (5-9). Most patients in Malaysia were pig farmers, and human infection was linked to exposure to pigs (10). An operation to cull the approximately 1 million pigs on farms in the outbreak-affected areas was carried out, primarily by 1,638 military personnel. After two soldiers involved in culling became ill with Nipah encephalitis, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of military personnel participating in culling activities in the outbreak-affected states of Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan and Selangor) to assess the prevalence of Nipah infection.

The survey was conducted approximately 2-4 weeks after the end of all culling activities to control the outbreak. All military personnel, enlisted and officers, who had been assigned to culling duty in the states of Negeri Sembilan and Selangor were invited to participate, regardless of specific job assignment. Study teams visited the military bases in each state and administered a survey asking about illness, specific exposures and activities during culling, use of protective equipment such as gloves, and other pig exposures not associated with culling. A single serum specimen obtained at the time of the interview was tested for the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus by enzyme immunoassays (EIA). IgM antibodies were detected by an IgM-capture EIA and IgG antibodies by an indirect EIA. Hendra virus antigens, which cross-react with antibodies against Nipah virus, were used in the serologic assays. In limited laboratory comparisons with Hendra virus and Nipah virus antigens, a good correlation was observed between the IgG and IgM EIA results.

Of 1,474 military personnel listed in the records of the military bases where the survey was performed, 1,412 (96%) responded to the survey and provided serum specimens. The mean age of the participants was 28.3 years (range 19 to 50 years). On average, the soldiers participated in culling for 8.2 days (range 1 to 60 days), for 7.4 hours per day (range 0.5 to 18 hours per day), and at 86 farms (range 1 to 696 farms). During culling, 63% reported physical contact with live pigs and 30.9% with dead pigs. The most common activities reported by the soldiers included shooting pigs (63.2%); herding, hitting, or carrying live pigs (60.5%); changing rifle magazines (39.4%); carrying dead pigs (25.8%); and spraying lime over pig burial sites (14.6%). More than 80% reported wearing gloves, masks, and boots, and 31% reported wearing goggles at all times during culling.

Six (0.4%) of the 1,412 personnel studied had detectable antibody against Nipah virus. All six had IgM antibody, and one also had IgG antibodies. Two of the six antibody-positive persons had been hospitalized with encephalitis during the culling operation. All the antibody-positive personnel were involved in culling in Negeri Sembilan state and reported direct physical contact with live pigs; none reported obvious contact with secretions or body fluids (e.g., blood and urine) of infected pigs. Four of the six antibody-positive persons also reported direct physical contact with dead pigs. All six reported wearing gloves, masks, and boots at all times while working, and three reported wearing goggles.

Comparison of exposures and activities among personnel involved in culling in Negeri Sembilan state (N = 960) and Selangor state (N = 497) showed that the former were more likely to report direct physical contact with both live pigs (69.4% vs. 57.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and dead pigs (41.7% vs. 11.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). However, the reported prevalence of sick pigs on farms where pigs were culled did not differ between the two groups (68.6% versus 72.9%, respectively, p = 0.50). No significant differences were observed in use of personal protective equipment (gloves, boots, and mask) for those in Negeri Sembilan compared with Selangor, except for wearing goggles (34.8% versus 76.4%, respectively, p < 0.001).

Our findings indicate that transmissibility of Nipah virus to military personnel involved in pig culling was low. Four of the six infected persons were apparently well; follow-up of these and the other infected soldiers will be important to determine if any symptoms of disease or long-term sequelae develop. The observation that all the infected persons reported direct contact with live pigs is consistent with the hypothesis that transmission of Nipah virus to humans most likely occurs from close contact with infectious secretions or body fluids of pigs. Respiratory secretions and urine of infected pigs have been shown to contain Nipah virus and may be vehicles of transmission (1,2,4).

We could not document the route of infection for the antibody-positive personnel. Although all six antibody-positive persons reported wearing gloves, masks, and boots while culling, three did not report wearing goggles. Exposure may have occurred through inoculation of the conjunctiva with infectious secretions of pigs; however, bias in reporting use of other protective equipment should also be considered. Given the great severity of Nipah encephalitis and the possible, although small, risk of transmission of virus to military personnel involved in culling, we recommend great care in handling potentially Nipah-infected pigs during such operations.



We thank Patrick Stockton, Deborah Cannon, and Kathy Veilleux for analysis of serologic specimens. We thank the following for their contribution to this study: Tan Sri Dato' Abu Bakar Suleiman, Dato' Dr. Tee Ah Sian, Flora Ong, Prema Rajendran, Rusdi A. Rahman, Zainab Ramli, Badrul Hisham, Sawri Rajan, Thanasingaran, Jalal Halil, Marlia Md. Salleh, Abu Hassan, Rosemawati Ariffin, Lt. Col. Rashid, Jaharan Singh, Chia Lip Meng, Tan Hang Meng, Johari Jantan, Latiff Muhammad, Hatta Hj. Manis, Rahimi Khalid, Mohd Shah, and Ridzuan Mansor. We also thank staff members of the Environmental Health Research Centre and Division of Epidemiology and Statistics, Institute for Medical Research, the State Health Departments, and the Army Units for their assistance.


Roslinah Ali*, Anthony W. Mounts†, Umesh D. Parashar†, Mazrura Sahani‡, Munn Sann Lye‡, Marzukhi Md. Isa*, K. Balathevan§, Md. Taha Arif*, and Thomas G. Ksiazek†
Author affiliations: *Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ‡Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; §Ministry of Defence, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia



  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Hendra-like virus--Malaysia and Singapore, 1998-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:2659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Outbreak of Nipah virus--Malaysia and Singapore, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:3357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chua  KB, Goh  KJ, Wong  KT, Kamarulzaman  A, Tan  PS, Ksiazek  TG, Fatal encephalitis due to Nipah virus among pig-farmers in Malaysia. Lancet. 1999;354:12579. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chua  KB, Bellini  WJ, Rota  PA, Harcourt  BH, Tamin  A, Lam  SK, Nipah virus: a recently emergent deadly paramyxovirus. Science. 2000;288:14325. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Murray  K, Selleck  P, Hooper  P. A morbillivirus that caused fatal disease in horses and humans. Science. 1995;268:947. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Murray  K, Rogers  R, Selvey  L, Selleck  P, Hyatt  A, Gould  A, A novel morbillivirus pneumonia of horses and its transmission to humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1:313. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Selvey  LA, Wells  RM, McCormack  JG, Ansford  AJ, Murray  K, Rogers  RJ, Infection of humans and horses by a newly described morbillivirus. Med J Aust. 1995;162:6425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hooper  PT, Gould  AR, Russell  GM, Kattenbelt  JA, Mitchell  G. The retrospective diagnosis of a second outbreak of equine morbillivirus infection. Aust Vet J. 1996;74:2445. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rogers  RJ, Douglas  IC, Baldock  FC, Glanville  RJ, Seppanen  KT, Gleeson  LJ, Investigation of a second focus of equine morbillivirus infection in coastal Queensland. Aust Vet J. 1996;74:2434. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parashar  UD, Lye  MS, Ong  F, Mounts  AW, Arif  MT, Ksiazek  TG, Case-control study of risk factors for human infection with a new zoonotic paramyxovirus, Nipah virus, during a 1998-1999 outbreak of severe encephalitis in Malaysia. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:17559. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0704.017433

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.