Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 9, Number 1—January 2003

Seasonal Dynamics of Anaplasma phagocytophila in a Rodent-Tick (Ixodes trianguliceps) System, United Kingdom

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Kevin J. Bown*Comments to Author , Michael Begon*, Malcolm Bennett*, Zerai Woldehiwet*, and Nicholas H. Ogden*
Author affiliations: *University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Cite This Article


We investigated the reservoir role of European wild rodents for Anaplasma phagocytophila using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of blood collected from individually tagged rodents captured monthly over 2 years. The only tick species observed in the woodland study site was Ixodes trianguliceps, and ruminant reservoir hosts were not known to occur. A. phagocytophila infections were detected in both bank voles and wood mice but were restricted to periods of peak nymphal and adult tick activity. Most PCR-positive rodents were positive only once, suggesting that rodent infections are generally short-lived and that ticks rather than rodents may maintain the infection over winter. Bank voles were more likely to be PCR positive than wood mice, possibly because detectable infections are longer lived in bank voles. This study confirms that woodland rodents can maintain A. phagocytophila in Great Britain in the absence of other reservoir hosts and suggests that I. trianguliceps is a competent vector.

Anaplasma phagocytophila (formerly Ehrlichia phagocytophila, E. equi, and the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis [HGE]; [1]) is an obligate intracellular bacterium that targets mainly granulocytes in its mammalian hosts (2). This bacterium has a wide mammalian host range, infecting domesticated animals such as dogs, sheep, cows, and horses (25), as well as wildlife species such as deer and rodents (6,7). The discovery of HGE, an acute febrile disease, in the United States and Europe (8,9) has generated increasing public health interest in this organism.

A. phagocytophila is transmitted by ixodid ticks; in the United States, the principal vectors are Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus (6,10), while in Europe the main vector is thought to be I. ricinus (3). A. phagocytophila is transstadially transmitted by all these vector ticks and, to date, no evidence of transovarial transmission has been found (3,6,11,12).

A number of studies have reported A. phagocytophila infection in wild rodents in the United States, the United Kingdom, and mainland Europe (6,13,14), but relatively little is known about the precise role that rodents play in its ecology and epidemiology, especially in Europe. Recently, A. phagocytophila has been detected in woodland rodents in northwest England, where I. trianguliceps, a nidicolous tick that feeds almost exclusively on small mammals, was the only tick species identified on rodents (11). This woodland rodent/I. trianguliceps/A. phagocytophila system is therefore one of many supporting a tickborne zoonosis, where lack of knowledge of the dynamics of the interacting populations is a major barrier to understanding potential threats to human health. We report the results of a longitudinal study of this system conducted during 2 years from January 1997 to December 1998.

Materials and Methods

Small Mammals and Sample Collection

The study was conducted in woodland area in northwest England (N53:20:48, W03:02:50). Grazing livestock were excluded by fencing, and no deer are present in the locality. Brown hares (Lepus europaeus) and grey squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) occur in the wood at low densities. Although their status as reservoir hosts for A. phagocytophila is unknown, these two species are unlikely to be frequent hosts of the nidicolous I. trianguliceps. Rodents were trapped as previously described (15,16). Briefly, 200 Longworth traps (Penlon Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK) were placed on a 1-hectare grid over 3 consecutive trap-nights every 4 weeks in 1997 and 1998 for a total of 26 sample periods. Individual animals were identified by a microchip transponder (Avid Pettrac, Sussex, UK), inserted subcutaneously on first capture. At first capture in each sample period, we recorded body mass, numbers of feeding ticks, and evidence of flea infestation and took a blood sample (approximately 50 µL) from the tail tip, after which the rodent was released. On first capture, we also assigned animals to one of three age categories on the basis of mass. Using monthly growth rates estimated from field data and laboratory information on mass at 2 weeks of age, we calculated mass thresholds for juvenile (J; <6weeks), subadult (S; 6–10 weeks) and adult (A; >10 weeks) age categories (unpub. data). Thresholds used were as follows: wood mice, April–July: J = <15 g, S = 15–18 g, A = >18 g; wood mice, August–December: J = <14 g, S = 14–17 g, A = >17 g; bank voles, April–July: J = <14 g, S = 14–17 g, A = >17 g; and bank voles, August–December: J = <12 g, S = 12–14 g, A = >14 g.

This study was intended to be as noninvasive as possible, and ticks were not routinely collected in case this affected the transmission of A. phagocytophila in the study site where pilot studies had suggested that tick densities were low. Small numbers of engorged ticks were, however, collected from rodents at the study site between May 1997 and August 1998. Because of the nidicolous nature of I. trianguliceps, no questing ticks were collected.

DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

DNA was extracted from blood pellets by alkaline digestion (17). We added 0.5 mL 1.25% ammonia solution to the blood sample in a Sure-Lock microcentrifuge tube (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and heated at 100°C for 20 min. After brief centrifugation, the tubes were opened and heated until half the initial volume had evaporated. This solution was then diluted 1 in 10 in sterile deionized, distilled water, and 5 µL was included in the first round of PCR reactions. Sensitivity was compared with that of a commercial kit by extracting DNA from serial dilutions of acutely infected sheep blood; PCR of these dilutions indicated the limit of detection to be approximately two infected leukocytes for both methods, the same as previously reported (11). The same method was used to extract DNA from ticks that had first been macerated in the microcentrifuge tube with a pipette tip. For engorged adult female ticks, however, the initial volume of 1.25% ammonia solution was 1 mL.

A. phagocytophila infection was detected by using a nested PCR specifically targeting the 16S rDNA of A. phagocytophila, as described previously (11). Each 50-µL reaction contained 1.5 mM Mg Cl2, 0.2 mM each of dNTP, 75 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.8), 20 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1.25 U Taq polymerase (Abgene, Surrey, UK), and 40 pmol of each of the following primers (18):

first reaction: EE1: TCCTGGCTCAGAACGAACGCTGGCGGC; EE2: GTCACTGACCCAACCTTAAATGGCTG; second reaction: EE3: GTCGAACGGATTATTCTTTATAGCTTGC; EE4: CCCTTCCGTTAAGAAGGATCTAATCTCC. For the second-round reaction, 1 µL of the first-round product was added as template. Both reactions consisted of 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 60 sec, followed by a final extension stage of 72°C for 5 min.

16S rRNA Sequence Analysis

The PCR product from a positive bank vole was cloned by using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced by using an ABI 377 automated sequencer. The sequence (GenBank accession no. AY082656) was compared to previously published A. phagocytophila sequences on GenBank by using the BLAST program from the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (available from: URL:

Statistical Analysis

We investigated two outcome variables, the numbers of ticks counted per rodent and the rodent blood PCR result. Our purpose was to identify the factors that influenced the contact rates of rodents with ticks and the probability that the rodents acquired A. phagocytophila infections.

Analysis of Rodent Infestations

Distributions of larval, nymphal, and adult ticks were significantly different from normal and Poisson distributions (p<0.05), but none were significantly different from the negative binomial distribution (p>0.1). Consequently, factors influencing the numbers of adult, nymphal, and larval ticks counted per rodent were investigated by using negative binomial, linear regression models in STATA for Windows version 6 (19). Rodent ID number was included as a random effect to account for repeated sampling of some of the rodents (20).

The analysis was undertaken in two stages. In the first stage, we investigated any seasonal variations in the abundance of ticks because such variations could superimpose on seasonal variations in rodent demography and confound investigation of animal-level variables. This stage itself involved three steps. First, we tested the null hypothesis that no significant variation existed in the counted numbers of ticks among sample periods. Second, we tested the null hypothesis that variation in the numbers of ticks among sample periods was not different from the specific pattern of seasonal I. trianguliceps abundance suggested by the detailed study of Randolph (21) after visual examination of data from a woodland in southern England (N51:01:46; W0:50:11). Other studies on I. trianguliuceps conducted in different locations in the United Kingdom at different times have suggested that the seasonal pattern of I. trianguliceps abundance observed by Randolph is more general in the United Kingdom (2224). In this analysis we compared the power of binary variables for year, season (spring, summer, autumn, and winter), and the tick activity periods observed by Randolph (e.g., June and September–January for larvae, and May–August for nymphs) to explain any between-sampling variation in tick abundance observed in the present study. Third, we sought the optimum pattern of between-sampling variation in tick abundance in the present study by investigating binary dummy variables for each sampling period, as well as those for year and seasons. In these models, forward and backward elimination and combination of variables were performed stepwise until a minimal model was reached beyond which the variables could not be combined without significantly affecting model deviance.

In the second stage, we investigated rodent-level factors of species, sex, age category, and mass as explanatory variables for tick infestations in multivariable models that accounted for any seasonal variation in tick abundance deduced in the first stage. Mass and age category were investigated in separate models because of some colinearity. We also investigated interactions between sex and species and between sex and mass as explanatory factors. In addition, evidence for relationships between parasitism with one tick developmental stage and another was investigated by using similar regression models, accounting for any deduced seasonal variation in tick abundance and notable animal-level factors. The critical probability was p<0.05 throughout.

Analysis of PCR Result

Rodent species and sex, mass, and age category (in separate models), the presence of fleas (a binary variable), and the numbers of larval, nymphal, and adult ticks counted per rodent were investigated as variables that could explain results of PCR analysis of rodent blood by using logistic regression models in STATA. Interactions between sex and species and between sex and mass were also investigated as explanatory factors. The binary variable age (rodent >6 months old) was investigated in case susceptibility increased in older animals that had not recently received infectious challenge, as occurs in sheep (2). Rodent ID number was again included as a random effect. The likelihood that a rodent encountered a tick of a particular developmental stage in any month of the study was investigated by using variables developed (as described previously) in investigations of the seasonal activity of ticks. However, any infections detected at one sample period may have been acquired from ticks (or other vectors) that attached to rodents in the previous sample period (because of latent detectability of infections) (3,2527), or from ticks that fed and dropped off without being counted (21). To account for this, we investigated four additional binary variables as explanatory of rodent infections: whether the rodent was infested, either at the time of sample or the previous sample period, with a tick of a given stage or a flea, termed “carried a larva,” “carried a nymph,” “carried an adult,” and “carried a flea.” The critical probability was p<0.05 throughout.


Rodents Captured and Their Tick Infestations

Over the study period, we captured 690 rodents: 475 wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) and 209 bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus), plus 6 field voles (Microtus agrestis) which, because of the low numbers, were excluded from subsequent analyses. I. trianguliceps was the only species of tick found on the rodents during this study. Data on the numbers of captures and ticks are summarized in Table 1.

We found significant differences among sampling periods in the numbers of larvae and nymphs counted on rodents (likelihood ratio statistic chi square=72 and 65 for larvae and nymphs, respectively, df=25, p<0.0005). We found no significant differences among sampling periods in the numbers of adults counted on rodents (chi square=22, df=25, p>0.25).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of The mean (+/- SE) numbers of larval, nymphal, and adult Ixodes trianguliceps ticks counted per rodent at 4-week intervals, 1997–1998. Shaded areas of similar intensity indicate ticks of different instars that may have belonged to the same cohort, according to interstadial development times deduced by Randolph (21). Arrows indicate potential transmission cycles: bold arrows indicate potential transmission from infected nymphs to uninfected larvae by means of rodent infections. Fine a

Figure 1. The mean (+/- SE) numbers of larval, nymphal, and adult Ixodes trianguliceps ticks counted per rodent at 4-week intervals, 1997–1998. Shaded areas of similar intensity indicate ticks of different instars that...

The counted numbers of larvae were significantly higher in those sample periods that occurred in months when larvae were most abundant in the studies of Randolph (coefficient=0.311, SE=0.140, p=0.027) (21). This, however, only partly explained the between-sampling variation in larval abundance: in the most parsimonious model, significantly more larvae were counted on the rodents in 1997 than in 1998 (coefficient=0.506, SE=0.114, p<0.001) and significantly more were counted in autumn than in other months (coefficient=0.568, SE=0.135, p<0.001). In the more detailed analysis, the most parsimonious model grouped the sampling periods into three significantly different levels of abundance (Table 2), with larvae being most (and similarly) abundant in sampling periods that fell during January 1997, late June and July 1997, October–November 1997, and September–December 1998 (Figure 1). Larvae were least abundant in March to early May 1997, July 1997, January–May 1998, and July and August 1998 (Figure 1). When this grouping of sample periods was included, differences between years, seasons, and the periods observed by Randolph became nonsignificant l (chi square=4.13, df =3, p>0.2).

For nymphs, numbers counted were significantly higher in those sample periods that included months when nymphs were most abundant in the studies of Randolph (coefficient=1.907, SE=0.281, p<0.001), but again this finding only partly explained the between-sampling variation in the present study. In the most parsimonious model, significantly more nymphs were counted on the rodents in winter than in other months (coefficient=2.477, SE=1.027, p=0.016), and in the more detailed analysis, the most parsimonious model grouped the sampling periods into two significantly different levels of seasonal abundance (Table 2). We found no significant difference between years in the numbers of nymphs counted on the rodents (p>0.5) and when nymphs were most abundant in May–September and November in both years (Figure 1). Differences between seasons and the months of nymphal abundance observed by Randolph became nonsignificant when this grouping of sample periods was included in the same model (chi square=2.73, df=2, p>0.25).

Low numbers of adult female ticks were counted on the rodents. Although no significant differences were found among sample periods in their abundance, the raw data suggested that adult ticks were more abundant in early summer and autumn in both years than at other times (Figure 1).

Based on these findings, scales of a seasonal likelihood that a rodent encountered a larva or nymph (three- and two-point scales for larvae and nymphs, respectively) were included as explanatory variables in the second stage of the analysis. We found that heavier rodents carried greater numbers of ticks of any stage (coefficients=0.029, 0.099, and 0.170; p=0.033, 0.001, and 0.002, for larvae, nymphs, and adults, respectively; Table 3). Male bank voles carried significantly more larvae than did female bank voles and wood mice (coefficient=0.580, SE=0.279, p=0.037; Table 3). Wood mice of either sex carried significantly more larvae than female bank voles (coefficient=0.462; SE=0.229; p=0.044; Table 3). Male bank voles carried significantly more nymphs than did female bank voles or wood mice of either sex (coefficient=2.394; p=0.004; Table 3). Although some confounding between rodent mass and age category occurred, the latter was not significantly associated with variations in tick infestations (p>0.1 in all models). In models in which the scales of seasonal likelihood were excluded, almost all rodent-level factors remained significant, with the exception of the relationship between the counted numbers of larvae and rodent weight (p<0.334).

Accounting for the seasonal likelihood of encountering a larva or nymph and rodent weight, sex, and species, a significant, positive relationship existed between the numbers of larvae and nymphs that fed on individual rodents (coefficient=0.373, SE=0.123, p=0.002). No significant relationships existed between the numbers of adult and larval ticks nor between the numbers of adult and nymphal ticks carried by the rodents (p>0.5 for both).

  • A. phagocytophila Infections in Rodents

Of 1,429 rodent blood samples tested, 527 were collected from bank voles and 902 from wood mice. Of these, 26 (5%) samples from bank voles (11%; 23/201 individual animals) and 7 (0.8%) samples from wood mice (1.8%; 7/390 individual animals) were PCR positive for A. phagocytophila. Analysis showed the sequence of bank vole origin (GenBank accession no. AY082656) was 99.9% similar to previously published sequences (e.g., GenBank accession no. AF470701.1); the sole difference was a guanine at base 33 in place of an adenine.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Prevalence of infection of Anaplasma phagocytophila (bar graphs +/- exact binomial errors) in blood samples collected from bank voles (graph marked a) and wood mice (graph marked b) compared to the mean monthly numbers of nymphal and adult Ixodes trianguliceps ticks counted per rodent at the time blood samples were collected (line graphs), 1997–1998.

Figure 2. Prevalence of infection of Anaplasma phagocytophila (bar graphs +/- exact binomial errors) in blood samples collected from bank voles (graph marked a) and wood mice (graph marked b) compared to the...

Only blood from rodents captured during the periods June–November 1997, May–August 1998, and December 1998 was PCR positive (Figure 2). The highest prevalence of infection among bank voles was 30% (3/10 rodents in August 1998). The highest prevalence of infection among wood mice was 7.5% (6/80 rodents in October 1997). Blood from one bank vole was PCR positive in three consecutive sample periods, and blood from another was positive in two consecutive periods. One bank vole had PCR-positive blood on two occasions but had PCR-negative blood in the intervening sample period. Most rodents, however, had PCR-positive blood at only one sample period either because they were not trapped again after being positive (1 wood mouse and 9 bank voles) or because the results were negative at the subsequent sample period (6 wood mice and 14 bank voles). Of all rodents with PCR-positive blood, four bank voles and five wood mice had been captured and had negative results by PCR at more than one subsequent sampling period (a mean of four sample periods for the wood mice and five for the bank voles).

Univariate analyses showed bank voles were significantly more likely to have been PCR positive than wood mice (odds ratio [OR] 8.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.08 to 21.59, p<0.001), and rodents were significantly more likely to be PCR positive if they carried a nymph (OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.62 to 18.54, p=0.006) or carried an adult tick (OR 9.25, 95% CI 2.10 to 40.84, p=0.003). Indices of the seasonal likelihood that rodents encountered a nymphal (as described above) or an adult tick (whether or not adult ticks were observed on any rodent in that sample period) were also significantly and positively associated with the likelihood that rodents were PCR positive (OR 4.9, CI 1.54 to15.86, p=0.007; OR 8.84, CI 2.74 to 28.47, p<0.001 for nymphs and adults, respectively). In the most parsimonious multivariable model, bank voles remained significantly more likely to be PCR positive and rodents were significantly more likely to be PCR positive if they carried a nymph or carried an adult (Table 4), although there was considerable confounding between the latter two factors and the indices of seasonal likelihood that rodents encountered nymphal or adult ticks. Seven (30%) of the 23 bank voles that had PCR-positive blood on the first occasion carried a nymphal or adult tick at time of sampling or at the previous sampling. In comparison, over the whole study, 80 (13%) of 598 captured bank voles and 162 (10%) of 1,698 of all rodents captured carried a nymph or and adult tick. Two PCR-positive bank voles carried a nymph or adult at the time of sampling only, three carried a nymph or adult at the previous sampling only, and two carried a nymph or adult at both samplings. None of the PCR-positive wood mice carried nymphs or adults at either sampling. No significant associations (p>0.1) were found between detected rodent infections and the presence of fleas at the time of sampling or if they also had a history of carrying a flea at the previous sampling. None of the other variables investigated, including interactions, was significantly associated with detected infection in the rodents in any of the models (p>0.1 for all). All significant factors remained so in models in which data from repeat-positive rodents were excluded.

  • A. phagocytophila Infection in I. trianguliceps Ticks

Of 59 I. trianguliceps ticks tested for A. phagocytophila infection, 39 were larvae, 7 were nymphs, and 13 were adult females. One (2.6%) of the larvae and 2 (15.3%) of the adult females tested positive, but none of the nymphs did. The PCR-positive larva was collected from one PCR-negative wood mouse captured in November 1997, whereas the positive adults came from one PCR-positive bank vole and one PCR-negative wood mouse captured in May 1998.


This study provides strong evidence that A. phagocytophila can be maintained in a system in which woodland rodents are a dominant reservoir host species and further suggests that I. trianguliceps is a competent vector. In addition, this study increases our understanding of the ecology of A. phagocytophila in a natural system. Detectable rodent infections were highly seasonal: PCR-positive rodents were detected from summer through autumn in both years of the study, but not from January to April in either year. This seasonality in infection prevalence appears to be associated with seasonal increases in the abundance of I. trianguliceps nymphs and adults, but not larvae. This finding is consistent with transstadial, but not transovarial, maintenance of A. phagocytophila by I. trianguliceps as appears to be the case for its other ixodid tick vectors (3,6,12). These findings, together with the detection of PCR-positive adult ticks, suggest that I. trianguliceps is a competent vector of A. phagocytophila.

Although individuals of both the common rodent species present in this woodland were PCR positive, bank voles were significantly more likely to be so (approximately eightfold) than wood mice, and positive wood mice were only detected in 1 month in each year. These differences may have been due in part to the greater numbers of nymphs carried by bank voles (approximately fourfold) than by wood mice. Differences in the roles of these two species as hosts for different developmental stages of I. trianguliceps have been recorded previously (22,28). In the present study, male bank voles carried a significantly greater proportion of nymphal and larval ticks, and heavier rodents of either species were more likely to carry a tick of any stage. These relationships imply that the lower resistance of reproductively active male bank voles for ticks (including I. trianguliceps; [29]) could be an explanatory factor, but other behavioral characteristics (e.g., resident rather than dispersing) (30) may have made them more likely to encounter ticks. Even when interspecific differences in contact rates with nymphal I. trianguliceps are allowed for, however, bank voles were significantly more likely to be detected as infected with A. phagocytophila than were wood mice. The course of infection in the two species may, therefore, be different. Although the majority of infections appeared to be transiently detectable, as are most infections in white-footed mice (31), 3 of the 22 PCR-positive bank voles were positive for more than one 4-week period, suggesting that A. phagocytophila infections may be more persistent in bank voles. If bank vole infections are more persistent, then by sampling every 4 weeks we may have missed proportionally more infections in wood mice than in bank voles.

The seasonal variations in the abundance of larval and nymphal I. trianguliceps in this study were very similar to those observed by Randolph (21), with some differences in detail. In both studies, larvae were most abundant from August to December or January, with a shorter period of activity in early summer that varied in amplitude between years. Nymphs were most abundant from May to August with some activity continuing through autumn. Although the numbers of adults were very low in this study, their seasonal appearance also corresponded to the findings in Randolph’s study. The similarities of the results of these and other studies (2224) suggest that the observed variations in tick abundance may represent a more general seasonally repeated pattern of I. trianguliceps abundance, driven by the temperature-dependent tick development times deduced by Randolph (21). In this case, any cycles of I. trianguliceps–transmitted A. phagocytophila infection in the woodland may have comprised two components: a rapid within-year midsummer to early autumn component because of rapid intersstadial development of ticks influenced by higher summer temperatures (Figure 1A), and a longer component from autumn one year to spring/summer the next year because of lower intersstadial development rates influenced by low winter temperatures (Figure 1B).

The relatively short duration of A. phagocytophila infections in these rodents may have more general implications for the nature of endemic cycles involving rodents and the occurrence of rodent-derived infected ticks to which humans may be exposed in Europe. First, infected ticks are more likely to have been the most important overwinter reservoir of A. phagocytophila than the rodents, particularly as the tick development period over the winter may have been at the limit of the life expectancy of the rodents (16), a factor that may limit overwinter survival of rodent Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato infections in some foci in northern Europe (32). This implication contrasts with the role of some rodent reservoirs such as the dusky-footed wood rat (Neotoma fuscipes) in the United States, which can remain PCR-positive for more than 1 year and act as an overwinter reservoir of infection (33,34).

Second, in experimentally infected rodents, efficient A. phagocytophila transmission to ticks occurs for only a short period because transmission is inhibited by the onset of acquired host resistance (35), a characteristic shared by tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) (36) but not B. burgdorferi s.l. infections in rodents (37). Because of such short periods of infectivity, the occurrence of endemic cycles of TBEV depends on coincident seasonal activities of different I. ricinus tick instars, coupled with aggregation of ticks of more than one instar on a small proportion of the rodent population (38). In our study, seasonal activities of larvae, nymphs, and adults were partly coincident, the distribution of ticks among rodents was highly aggregated, and larvae and nymphs co-fed on a small proportion of the population (particularly bank voles), conditions that may have enhanced transmission of short-lived A. phagocytophila infections. Such conditions may also promote co-feeding transmission of A. phagocytophila (35): the detection of infection in a larval tick collected from a PCR-negative rodent may suggest that this transmission route occurs naturally on rodents. European rodents may, therefore, be important reservoirs of A. phagocytophila, but the risk of rodent-derived human infections may be constrained by factors that also constrain the risk of TBEV infection when endemic cycles are maintained by exophilic I. ricinus ticks alone.

In this study, cycles of infection were maintained even though the mean numbers of I. trianguliceps per rodent were very low (never >1 for any instar). Therefore, when I. trianguliceps and I. ricinus ticks are sympatric, I. trianguliceps–driven endemic cycles may provide an efficient reservoir from which I. ricinus may acquire infections from rodents, thus increasing the risk of rodent-derived human infections. In this respect, rodent-trianguliceps cycles may have a similar role in A. phagocytophila maintenance in Europe to that of cycles maintained in dusky wood rats and nidicolous I. spinipalpis ticks in the western United States where sympatric exophilic I. pacificus ticks are the bridge vector transmitting infections to humans and domesticated animals (33). This maintenance system may be particularly important in Great Britain, where woodland rodents carry few nymphal or adult I. ricinus (39) and, in the absence of I. trianguliceps, rodent A. phagocytophila infections may be uncommon (11). Further studies are required to test these hypotheses and investigate the role of rodent-derived A. phagocytophila in human infections in Europe.

Dr. Bown is currently a research associate in the faculty of Veterinary Science at the University of Liverpool. His interests include the ecology and epidemiology of wildlife diseases, particularly tick-borne infections.



We thank Sarah Hazel, Trevor Jones, Rachel Cavanagh, and Julian Chantrey for assisting in the rodent sampling and Sandra Telfer for providing the data on age categories.

This work was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust (Grant 055078).



  1. Dumler  JS, Barbet  AF, Bekker  CPJ, Dasch  GA, Palmer  GH, Ray  SC, Reorganisation of the genera of the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new combinations and designations of Ehrlichia equi and ‘HGE agent’ as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:214565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Woldehiwet  Z, Scott  GR. Tick-borne (pasture) fever. In: Woldehiwet Z, Ristic M. editors. Rickettsial and chlamydial diseases of domestic animals. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1993. p 233–54.
  3. Macleod  J, Gordon  WS. Studies on tick-borne fever in sheep I: transmission by the tick Ixodes ricinus and description of the disease produced. Parasitology. 1933;25:27383. DOIGoogle Scholar
  4. Hudson  JR. The recognition of tick-borne fever as a disease of cattle. Br Vet J. 1950;106:317.
  5. Bjoersdorff  A, Svendenius  L, Owens  JH, Massung  RF. Feline granulocytic ehrlichiosis — a report of a new clinical entity and characterisation of the infectious agent. J Small Anim Pract. 1999;40:204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Telford  SR, Dawson  JE, Katavlos  P, Warner  CK, Kolbert  CP, Persing  DH. Perpetuation of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in a deer tick-rodent cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:620914. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Belongia  EA, Reed  KD, Mitchell  PD, Kolbert  CP, Persing  DH, Gill  JS, Prevalence of granulocytic Ehrlichia infection among white-tailed deer in Wisconsin. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:14658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen  SM, Dumler  JS, Bakken  JS, Walker  DH. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:58995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lotric-Furlan  S, Petrovec  M, Zupanc  TA, Nicholson  WL, Sumner  JW, Childs  JE, Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe: clinical and laboratory findings for four patients from Slovenia. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:4248. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Richter  PJ, Kimsey  RB, Madigan  JE, Barlough  JE, Dumler  JS, Brooks  DL. Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) as a vector of Ehrlichia equi (Rickettsiales: Ehrlichieae). J Med Entomol. 1996;33:15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ogden  NH, Bown  K, Horrocks  BK, Woldehiwet  Z, Bennett  M. Granulocytic Ehrlichia infection in Ixodid ticks and mammals in woodlands and uplands of the U.K. Med Vet Entomol. 1998;12:4239. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ogden  NH, Casey  ANJ, French  NP, Bown  KJ, Adams  JDW, Woldehiwet  Z. Natural Ehrlichia phagocytophila transmission coefficients from sheep ‘carriers’ to Ixodes ricinus ticks vary with the numbers of feeding ticks. Parasitology. 2002;124:12736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bunnell  JE, Dumler  JS, Childs  JE, Glass  GE. Retrospective serosurvey for human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent in urban white-footed mice from Maryland. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34:17981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liz  JS, Anderes  L, Sumner  JW, Massung  RF, Gern  L, Rutti  B, PCR detection of granulocytic Ehrlichiae in Ixodes ricinus ticks and wild small mammals in western Switzerland. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:10027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chantrey  J, Meyer  H, Baxby  D, Begon  M, Bown  KJ, Hazel  SM, Cowpox: reservoir hosts and geographic range. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;122:45560. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hazel  SM, Bennett  M, Chantrey  J, Bown  K, Cavanagh  R, Jones  TR, A longitudinal study of an endemic disease in its wildlife reservoir: cowpox and wild rodents. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;124:55162. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurtenbach  K, Peacey  M, Rijpkema  SGT, Hoodless  AN, Nuttall  PA, Randolph  SE. Differential transmission of the genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato by game birds and small rodents in England. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:116974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Barlough  JE, Madigan  JE, DeRock  E, Bigornia  L. Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia equi genomic DNA in horses and ticks (Ixodes pacificus). Vet Parasitol. 1996;63:31929. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogers  WH. sg16.4: Comparison of nbreg and glm for negative binomial. Stata Technical Bulletin 16:7. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 3, 1993. p. 82–4.
  20. Diggle  PJ, Liang  KY, Zeger  SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications; 1994.
  21. Randolph  SE. Seasonal dynamics of a host-parasite system: Ixodes trianguliceps (Acarina: Ixodidae) and its small mammal hosts. J Anim Ecol. 1975a;44:42549. DOIGoogle Scholar
  22. Turnbull  DM. Contributions to the epidemiology of Louping-ill [dissertation]. Edinburgh: Univ. of Edinburgh; 1979.
  23. Cotton  MJ, Watts  CHS. The ecology of the tick Ixodes trianguliceps Birula (Arachnida;Acarina;Ixodoidea). Parasitology. 1967;57:52531. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussein  H. Ixodes trianguliceps: seasonal abundance and role in the epidemiology of Babesia microti infection in north-western England. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1980;74:5319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodzic  E, Fish  D, Maretzki  CM, de Silva  AM, Feng  SL, Barthold  SW. Acquisition and transmission of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by Ixodes scapularis ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1998a;36:35748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodzic  E, Ijdo  JWI, Feng  SL, Katavolos  P, Sun  W, Maretzki  CH, Granulocytic ehrlichiosis in the laboratory mouse. J Infect Dis. 1998b;177:73745. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pusterla  N, Leutenegger  CM, Chae  JS, Lutz  H, Kimsey  RB, Dumler  JS, Quantitative evaluation of ehrlichial burden in horses after experimental transmission of human granulocytic Ehrlichia agent by intravenous inoculation with infected leukocytes and by infected ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:40424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Randolph  SE. Patterns of distribution of the tick Ixodes trianguliceps Birula on its hosts. J Anim Ecol. 1975b;44:45174. DOIGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes  VL, Randolph  SE. Testosterone depresses innate and acquired resistance to ticks in natural rodent hosts: a force for aggregated distributions of parasites. J Parasitol. 2001;87:4954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Alibhai  SK. Bank vole. In: Corbett GB, Harris S, editors. The handbook of British mammals. 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.; 1991. p.191–203.
  31. Stafford  KC III, Massung  RF, Magnarelli  LA, Ijdo  JW, Anderson  JF. Infection with agents of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, Lyme disease, and babesiosis in wild white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in Connecticut. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:288792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Talleklint  L, Jaenson  TGT. Is the small mammal (Clethrionomys glareolus) or the tick vector (Ixodes ricinus) the primary overwintering reservoir for the Lyme borreliosis spirochete in Sweden. J Wildl Dis. 1995;31:53740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Castro  MB, Nicholson  WL, Kramer  VL, Childs  JE. Persistent infection in Neotoma fuscipes (Muridae:Sigmodontinae) with Ehrlichia phagocytophila sensu lato. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:2617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Foley  JE, Kramer  V, Weber  D. Experimental infection of dusky-footed wood rats (Neotoma fuscipes) with Ehrlichia phagocytophila sensu lato. J Wildl Dis. 2002;38:1948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Levin  M, Fish  D. Immunity reduces reservoir host competence of Peromyscus leucopus for Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Infect Immun. 2000;68:15148. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Labuda  M, Kozuch  O, Zuffova  E, Eleckova  E, Hails  RS, Nuttall  PA. Tick-borne encephalitis virus transmission between ticks cofeeding on specific immune natural rodent hosts. Virology. 1997;235:13843. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gern  L, Siegenthaler  M, Hu  CM, Leuba-Garcia  S, Humair  PF, Moret  J. Borrelia burgdorferi in rodents (Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus): duration and enhancement of infectivity for Ixodes ricinus ticks. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10:7580. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Randolph  SE, Miklisova  D, Lysy  J, Rogers  DJ, Labuda  M. Incidence from coincidence: patterns of tick infestations on rodents facilitate transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Parasitology. 1999;118:17786. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Craine  NG, Randolph  SE, Nuttall  PA. Seasonal variation in the role of grey squirrels as hosts of Ixodes ricinus, the tick vector of the Lyme disease spirochaete, in a British woodland. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1995;42:7380.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0901.020169

Table of Contents – Volume 9, Number 1—January 2003

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

K.J. Bown, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science and Animal Husbandry, Leahurst, University of Liverpool, Chester High Road, Neston, UK, CH64 7TE; fax: 0044 151 7946005

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 07, 2010
Page updated: December 07, 2010
Page reviewed: December 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.