Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 9, Number 12—December 2003

International Travel and Sexually Transmitted Disease

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Recent articles in the professional literature (13) have offered advice regarding the importance of taking a careful travel history, particularly in this time of unprecedented levels of international travel (4). Such screening serves an important public health purpose as well, especially for sexually transmitted disease (STD) control.

Sexual behaviors associated with travel can change the level of risks for STD transmission (57), and the epidemiology of STDs is not uniform throughout the world (8,9). These geographic differences may increase the risk of a traveler’s becoming infected, or, conversely, increase the risk of a traveler’s introducing a sexually transmitted pathogen, possibly one that is resistant to treatment, into a low-incidence area (10). In addition, different strains of pathogens may be common in different parts of the world (1114). For example, quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae (QRNG) is much more common in Asia (up to 40% of all isolates) (15). These strains of QRNG were first introduced in the United States by persons who engaged in sexual activity abroad, but now California and Hawaii have an increasing incidence of infection attributable these strains (16). Indeed, QRNG has become endemic in those states, and incidence is no longer related to travel. During 1999–2001, only 3 QRNG isolates (0.28%) were identified among the 1,066 synococcal isolates cultured in the STD Laboratory, State Laboratory Institute, Massachusetts Department of Public Health (Massachusetts Department of Public Health, unpub. data). However, in 2002, 9 (2.1%) of 425 isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae were quinolone resistant. None of the persons recently infected reported a history of travel outside of New England. Unfortunately, few had reliable information to identify their partner(s). Those partners who were identified were either not located or did not agree to speak with the disease intervention specialist.

This experience with antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae should serve as a model for STD prevention planning and programming. It highlights the importance of retaining the laboratory capacity to monitor antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial STD isolates. Treatment protocols should be adjusted in light of the prevalence of resistant strains of sexually transmitted pathogens. In cases in which symptoms associated with a bacterial STD persist after what is usually considered appropriate treatment, clinicians should obtain cultures and perform susceptibility tests on isolates. Nucleic acid amplification technologies do not provide critical antibiotic susceptibility information. In this situation, the public health STD program or laboratory should be contacted for guidance. Determining the sensitivity pattern of the pathogen in an expeditious fashion will ensure that appropriate and timely therapy can be initiated for the infected patient as well as enable more effective follow-up and treatment to sexual contacts. Asking patients who seek treatment for a possible STD about their own and their partner’s travel histories is important to broaden the differential diagnosis (17). The increase in population mixing facilitated by travel and Internet-generated contacts may be diminishing the importance of the focality of traditional STD epidemiology. Finally, STD prevention messages should be a part of the health advice offered to travelers (7,18,19).



We thank Alfred DeMaria and Ralph Timperi for their thoughtful reviews and comments regarding this material.


Paul Etkind*, Sylvie Ratelle*Comments to Author , and Harvey George*
Author affiliations: *Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA



  1. Ryan  ET, Wilson  ME, Kain  KC. Illness after international travel. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:50516. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ryan  ET, Kain  KC. Health advice and immunizations for travelers. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:171625. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Harry  TC. Infectious syphilis and importance of travel history. Lancet. 2002;359:4478. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. The state of the world health. In: The world health report 1996: fighting disease, fostering development. Geneva: The Organization; 1997. p. 1–62.
  5. Matteelli  A, Carosi  G. Sexually transmitted disease in travelers. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:10637. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabada  MM, Echevarria  JI, Seas  CR, Navarte  G, Samalvides  F, Freedman  D, Sexual behavior of international travelers visiting Peru. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:5103. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloor  M, Thomas  M, Hood  K, Abdeni  D, Goujon  C, Hausser  D, Differences in sexual risk behaviour between young men and women travelling abroad from the UK. Lancet. 1998;352:16648. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerbase  AC, Rowley  JT, Mertens  TE. Global epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases. Lancet. 1998;351(Suppl 3):24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wasserheit  JN, Aral  SO. The dynamic topology of sexually transmitted disease epidemics: implications for prevention strategies. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(Suppl 2):S20113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Thompson  MM, Najera  R. Travel and the introduction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 non-B subtype genetic forms into western countries. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:17327. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organization/Global Program on AIDS. Global prevalence and incidence estimates of selected curable sexually transmitted diseases: Overview and estimates. Geneva. Organization. 1995; 126.
  12. Van Dyck  E, Crabbe  E, Neila  N, Bogaerts  J, Munyabikali  JP, Ghys  P, Increasing persistence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in west and central Africa. Consequence on therapy of gonococcal infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:327. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tapsall  JW, Phillips  EA, Schultz  TR, Thacker  C. Quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Sydney, Australia, 1991 to 1995. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23:4258. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis  DA, Bond  M, Butt  KD, Smith  CP, Shafi  MS, Murphy  SM. A one-year survey of gonococcal infection seen in the genitourinary medicine department of a London district general hospital. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10:58894. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Western Pacific Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme  WHO. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the WHO Western Pacific Region, 2000. Commun Dis Intell. 2001;25:2746.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increases in fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Hawaii and California. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:10414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kingston  M, Warren  C, Carlin  E. Tropical warts. Lancet. 2001;358:808. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulhall  BP. Sexual behaviour in travellers. Lancet. 1999;353:5956. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Abdullah  AS, Hedley  AJ, Fielding  R. Sexual behaviour in travellers. Lancet. 1999;353:5956. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0912.030210

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 9, Number 12—December 2003

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sylvie Ratelle, Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 305 South Street, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130, USA; fax: 617-983-6925

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: February 08, 2011
Page updated: February 08, 2011
Page reviewed: February 08, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.