Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 9, Number 2—February 2003

Infection of Cultured Human and Monkey Cell Lines with Extract of Penaeid Shrimp Infected with Taura Syndrome Virus

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Josefina Audelo-del-Valle*, Oliva Clement-Mellado†, Anastasia Magaña-Hernández†, Ana Flisser‡, Fernando Montiel-Aguirre‡Comments to Author , and Baltasar Briseño-García†
Author affiliations: *Universidad de Occidente, Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México; †Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, México, D.F., México; ‡Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México

Cite This Article


Taura syndrome virus (TSV) affects shrimp cultured for human consumption. Although TSV is related to the Cricket Paralysis virus, it belongs to the “picornavirus superfamily,” the most common cause of viral illnesses. Here we demonstrate that TSV also infects human cell lines, which may suggest that Penaeus is a potential reservoir of this virus.

The Taura syndrome virus (TSV) causes a disease affecting penaeid shrimp, the most important commercial family of crustaceans (1). The causal agent is a single-stranded (+) RNA virus, recently reported to be genomically related to the Cricket Paralysis virus of the Cripavirus genus, family Dicistroviridae of the “picornavirus superfamily” (25). This superfamily includes several human pathogens, for example, the common cold viruses and several enteroviruses (e.g., polioviruses). Traditionally, research on the replication of shrimp viruses has been based on the use of cultured fish cellular lines (6). However, because TSV could potentially represent a public health threat, we explored whether this viral agent might be capable of infecting cultured mammalian cells.

The Study

Since Sabin strain LSc 2ab (Sabin 1), the poliovirus used for human vaccination, is usually replicated in monolayer culture cells of human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD), human larynx carcinoma (Hep-2C) (), or Buffalo green monkey kidney (BGM) (7), we injected these cell lines with a 0.22-µm membrane-filtered whole extract of the hepatopancreas of shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris) affected with TSV. The animals were collected from farms located in northwestern Mexico. Control cell lines were injected with filtered hepatopancreas extracts from healthy shrimp. Cultures were incubated at 37°C and periodically observed under a microscope until any sign of cytopathic effect was detected (usually from 19–23 hours). Cells were then harvested and lysed. Fresh cell lines were inoculated with the lysate, incubated, and processed in a similar way. A third inoculation was again performed with the second lysate (8).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Image of mammalian cell lines injected with extracts from healthy shrimp: A, human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD), Cep-2C, BGM RD cells; C, human larynx carcinoma (Hep-2C) cells; E, BGM cells. Cytophatic effect in cultured cells inoculated with extracts from shrimp affected with Taura syndrome: B, RD cells; D, Hep-2C cells; F, BGM cells.

Figure 1. Image of mammalian cell lines injected with extracts from healthy shrimp: A, human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD), Cep-2C, BGM RD cells; C, human larynx carcinoma (Hep-2C) cells; E, BGM cells. Cytophatic effect in...

The cytopathic effect in RD cells began with a partial destruction of the cellular layer. Next, small cellular groups and some isolated round cells were observed. The cells showed an apparent increase in size, diffuse cell rounding, and a refringent aspect (Figure 1B). In Hep-2C cells, the cellular monolayer was partially destroyed. Most cells were individualized and clearly rounded; they also presented a refringent aspect. Hep-2C was the most affected of the three lines used (Figure 1D). The cytopathic effect in the BGM cell line began as a partial destruction of the cellular layer, which evolved to a syncytial-like formation of rounded, refringent cells. Some cells remained isolated but with altered morphology (Figure 1F). RD, Hep-2C, and BGM cells injected with an extract similarly processed but from healthy shrimp, showed no cytopathic effects, even after 7 days of culture (Figures 1A, 1C, and 1 E). As a positive control, RD cells were injected with Sabin viral extract and showed the characteristic cytopathic effect produced by an enterovirus infection.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Microscopic image of the subcuticular tissue of the pleopod from a shrimp infected with the supernatant of the third passage of a human larynx carcinoma (Hep-2C) cell culture inoculated with an extract of shrimp infected with Taura syndrome virus. The presence of the virus is clearly visible by in situ hybridization as black spots after the samples were stained with Bismarck brown.

Figure 2. Microscopic image of the subcuticular tissue of the pleopod from a shrimp infected with the supernatant of the third passage of a human larynx carcinoma (Hep-2C) cell culture inoculated with an...

To confirm the presence of TSV in the cell culture media, a bioassay was performed by using media from the third passage. For this assay, healthy P. stylirostris shrimp were injected with the infected medium in 10% volume of their corporal mass in the third abdominal segment. Twenty-four hours later, these animals were clearly infected, showing fragile antennas and soft cuticle as well as chromatophore expansion along the whole surface of the body, particularly at the tail fan (telson and uropods). These signs were clinically indistinguishable from those occurring in naturally infected animals and are considered as pathognomonic of the acute phase of infection by TSV (9). Presence of the viral genome in different subcuticular tissues (gills and pleopods) of these animals was confirmed by in situ hybridization by using TSV ShrimProbe (DiagXotics, Inc., Wilton, CT). RNA-DNA hybrids were clearly visible as black spots after the samples were stained with Bismarck brown (Figure 2). Shrimp injected with culture media from control cell lines showed no signs of infection after 7 days of observation.


If one takes into consideration the capacity of viruses to modify receptor recognition and host cell tropism and the fact that cell receptors for many of the picornavirus superfamily members seem to be ubiquitous membrane molecules (e.g., decay-accelerating factor, different type of integrins, low-density lipoprotein receptor, sialic acid [1012]), the potential wide range of host cells for TSV should not come as a surprise. To our knowledge, these cultured human and monkey cell lines are the first reported to be infected with a viral agent isolated from shrimp. Because many members of the picornavirus superfamily are the most common causes of viral illnesses worldwide (including nonspecific febrile illnesses, myocarditis, aseptic meningitis, and sepsis-like disease), such illnesses lead to frequent unnecessary prescription of antibiotics (13). Penaeus could be considered as a reservoir of a virus that could become a potential pathogen to humans and other mammals (11,14).

Ms. Audelo-del-Valle is a fisheries biologist and lecturer at the Universidad de Occidente, Campus Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México. She founded and directs the Molecular Biology Aquaculture Laboratory in the Universidad de Occidente and is currently a Ph.D. candidate.



We gratefully acknowledge Dolores Correa and Mirza Romero for helpful and critical discussions.



  1. Food and Agricultural Organization. Aquaculture production statistics 1987–1996. Rome: The Organization; 1998.
  2. Bonami  JR, Hasson  KW, Mari  J, Poulos  BT, Lightner  DV. Taura syndrome of marine penaeid shrimp: characterization of the viral agent. J Gen Virol. 1997;78:3139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mari  J, Poulos  BT, Lightner  DV, Bonami  JR. Shrimp Taura syndrome virus: genomic characterization and similarity with members of the genus Cricket paralysis-like viruses. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:91526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Robles-Sikisaka  R, Garcia  DK, Klimpel  KR, Dhar  AK. Nucleotide sequence of 3´-end of the genome of Taura syndrome virus of shrimp suggests that it is related to insect picornaviruses. Arch Virol. 2001;146:94152. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Regenmortel  MHV, Fauquet  CM, Bishop  DHL, Cartens  EB, Estes  MK, Lemon  SM, , eds. In: Virus taxonomy: seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000.
  6. Loh  PC, Tapay  LM, Lu  Y, Nadala  ECB Jr. Viral pathogens of the penaeid shrimp. Adv Virus Res. 1997;48:263312. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashkenazi  A, Melnick  JL. Enteroviruses: a review of their properties and associated diseases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1962;38:20929.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mahy  BWJ, Kangro  HO. Virology methods manual. London: Academic Press, Ltd.; 1996.
  9. Hasson  KW, Lightner  DV, Poulos  BT, Redman  RM, While  BL, Brock  JA, Taura syndrome in Penaeus vannamei: demonstration of a viral etiology. Dis Aquat Organ. 1995;23:11526. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans  DJ, Almond  JW. Cell receptors for picornaviruses as determinants of cell tropism and pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6:198202. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baranowski  E, Ruiz-Jarabo  CM, Domingo  E. Evolution of cell recognition by viruses. Science. 2001;292:11025. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rossmann  MG, He  Y, Kuhn  RJ. Picornavirus-receptor interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:32431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rotbart  HA, Hayden  FG. Picornavirus infections. A primer for the practitioner. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:91320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Weiss  RA. The Leeuwenhoek Lecture 2001. Animal origins of human infectious disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356:95777. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0902.020181

Table of Contents – Volume 9, Number 2—February 2003

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Fernando Montiel-Aguirre, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Química, Departamento de Biología, Cd. Universitaria C.P. 04510, México, D.F.; fax: 55 56 22 37 37

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 07, 2010
Page updated: December 07, 2010
Page reviewed: December 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.