Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 9, Number 8—August 2003

Nonhemolytic, Nonmotile Gram-Positive Rods Indicative of Bacillus anthracis

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Elie G. Dib*Comments to Author , Samar A. Dib*, Dany A. Korkmaz*, Neville K. Mobarakai*, and Jordan B. Glaser*
Author affiliations: *Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York, USA

Cite This Article


We report a 40-year-old female patient who was admitted to the hospital because of a left ovarian mass torsion. A nonhemolytic, nonmotile Bacillus, suspicious of Bacillus anthracis, was isolated from a blood culture. We discuss the evaluation that led to the final identification of the bacterium as B. megaterium.

Bacillus represents a genus of ubiquitous gram-positive bacteria. The species are used in many medical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and industrial processes, including those for making antibiotics and insecticides (14). Even the anthrax toxin is being evaluated as a choice for tumor cell surface targeting in chemoresistant neoplasms (5).

Although most species are harmless, two are medically significant: Bacillus anthracis and B. cereus. B. anthracis causes anthrax in its cutaneous, pulmonary (inhalational), and intestinal forms. B. cereus causes two distinct food poisoning syndromes, a rapid-onset emetic syndrome characterized by nausea and vomiting and a slower onset diarrheal syndrome.

Bacillus are often isolated on blood culture and usually represent blood culture contamination. For example, Bacillus species pseudobacteremia has been traced to contaminated gloves used in collection of blood from patients (6). In immunocompromised hosts, a blood culture growing Bacillus species should be evaluated carefully. Rarely, these species cause important clinical diseases such as bacteremia, sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia, empyema, ophthalmitis, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, soft tissue infection, and intravascular catheter-acquired sepsis.

Pseudotumour of the lung has been reported as the cause of infection with B. sphaericus (7). Endocarditis has been reported to be caused by B. subtilis (8). An outbreak of Bacillus species in a cancer hospital in Brazil was reported (9) and was strongly associated with use of calcium gluconate solution and central venous lines. The outbreak was controlled by stopping use of the implicated calcium gluconate vials.

Case Study

A 40-year-old woman, with no significant medical history, was seen at the emergency room because of worsening left lower quadrant abdominal pain. The pain, which had started a few days previously, was constant, localized to the left lower quadrant of the abdomen, and described as dull and moderately to severely intense. The pain was not related to meals or bowel movements and was not accentuated or relieved by any specific position. The patient noted constipation but had no nausea or vomiting. No rectal bleed or melena occurred, and she reported no urinary symptoms or vaginal discharge. Her last normal menstrual period was 8 days before. She felt warm but did not check her temperature and did not experience chills. Her primary medical physician prescribed ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice a day for the presumptive diagnosis of colitis. She took the antibiotic for 2 days without improvement.

In the emergency room, the patient was afebrile and hemodynamically stable. The physical examination showed tenderness on palpation of the left lower quadrant of the abdomen with minimal rebound tenderness. The pelvic examination showed left adnexal tenderness with a possible mass. Results of urinalysis and a urine pregnancy test were negative. No leukocytosis was noted. A pelvic ultrasonograph showed a left ovarian complex mass measuring 14 cm x 9 cm x 6 cm as well as a moderate amount of free fluid in the cul-de-sac. The study suggested left ovarian mass torsion. A laparascopic resection was performed successfully. The patient received intravenous cefazolin perioperatively. The final pathology report showed a mature teratoma of the left ovary featuring dermoid cyst, respiratory anlaga, and struma ovarii. The patient improved and was discharged 2 days after surgery.

One day later, a blood culture, drawn in the emergency room, grew nonhemolytic, nonmotile gram-positive rods. B. anthracis was suspected. The blood culture was reported to the New York City Department of Health. The patient was called for reassessment at the hospital. She was afebrile, and her only complaint was mild low back pain. She had mild dry cough, but results of a chest roentgenogram were unremarkable. She was started on intravenous clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, and rifampin. Two days later, the New York City Department of Health reported the following: results of the direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay, using fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibodies specific to the B. anthracis capsule (CAP-DFA) antigens, were positive; results of the DFA assay, using fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibodies specific to the B. anthracis cell wall (CW-DFA) were negative; and the Bacillus isolated was not lysed by the γ phage.

The organism was confirmed to be Bacillus non-anthracis. Based on its characteristics, it was classified as B. megaterium. The information was disclosed to the patient, and the intravenous antibiotic therapy was discontinued. The patient’s initial dry cough had resolved, and she had no evidence of any cutaneous, respiratory, or neurologic sign of disease. She was counseled about any potential side effects of the antibiotic therapy she had received, otherwise reassured, and then discharged.


Presumptive identification of B. anthracis in a hospital laboratory is based on the direct Gram-stained smear of a skin lesion, cerebrospinal fluid, or blood showing encapsulated, broad, gram-positive bacilli. Indicators of growth apparent on cultures are also factors. B. anthracis is nonmotile and nonhemolytic on sheep’s-blood agar. In vitro it grows as long chains, but in the host B. anthracis appears as single organisms or chains of two or three bacilli. The organism forms mucoid colonies and exhibits a prominent capsule when grown on nutrient agar containing 0.7% sodium bicarbonate in the presence of 5% to 20% carbon dioxide (10).

The only nonmotile Bacillus are B. anthracis and B. cereus subsp. mycoides. Some other Bacillus species show variable motility and may often be nonmotile. These species include B. megaterium, B. firmus, and B. circulans. At the community laboratory level, once the Bacillus colonies are identified as catalase-positive, nonhemolytic, nonmotile gram-positive rods, the organism should be packaged properly and transported to a state or county public health laboratory for confirmation (11).

Confirmatory diagnostic tests are performed at the Laboratory Response Network for Bioterrorism (LRN) (11), which consists of laboratories at four levels (1214). Laboratories at the community level, considered level A, should recognize the clues to a suspicious agent and package the agent for transfer to the next higher level laboratory.

Level-B laboratories often include the state and county public health laboratories. Criteria for confirming B. anthracis at this level include susceptibility to lysis by γ phage and a two-component DFA assay, using cell wall (CW-DFA) and capsule (CAP-DFA) antigens (11). The two-component DFA assay is a sensitive, specific, and rapid confirmatory test for B. anthracis in cultures (15,16). The lysis by γ phage (17) is highly specific for B. anthracis, and when demonstrated concomitantly with the presence of a capsule, confirms the identification. The New York City Department of Health protocol reports a sample as positive only if it has all the following phenotypes: nonmotile, penicillin sensitive, γ-phage positive, and positive by both cell wall and CAP-DFA assays (11).

The level-C laboratory has the capacity of the level-B laboratory, plus antimicrobial susceptibility testing and advanced detection methods. It also can help with surge capacity and has much greater biosafety-level working capacity. Advanced detection methods include time-resolved fluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (14,18). These methods are employed to quickly yield preliminary data in advance of the classical microbiology final report (11).

The level-D laboratory has the highest level of containment (biosafety level) and expertise in diagnosis. Various tests to determine the molecular characteristics of isolates are conducted, including molecular subtyping with multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis and sequencing of genes coding for 16S ribosomal RNA (19,20). The analysis allows for identification of a particular pattern that can be associated with geographic, temporal, or other relevant epidemiologic designations. The Centers for Disease Control and the U. S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases maintain level-D laboratories.

Once the Bacillus colonies from our patient were identified as catalase positive, nonhemolytic, nonmotile gram-positive rods, the organism was transported to the New York City Department of Health laboratory for further testing, as mandated by LRN. Although the patient’s symptoms did not correlate with classic anthrax disease, a fatal case of inhalational anthrax mimicking intraabdominal sepsis had been recently reported (21). The organism isolated in our patient was identified as B. megaterium, a frequent blood culture contaminant but rare cause of meningitis, brain abscess, and catheter-related bacteremia. The patient’s strain showed a positive reaction to the CAP-DFA assay. A recent study (16) also reported one B. megaterium strain (out of 11 strains) with a positive reaction to the CAP-DFA assay. This study analyzed a total of 230 B. anthracis isolates; 228 and 229 were positive by CW-DFA and CAP-DFA assays, respectively. A total of 56 B. non-anthracis strains were also tested; 10 B. cereus and 2 B. thuringiensis were positive by the CW-DFA assay, and 1 B. megaterium strain was positive by CAP-DFA. Analysis of the combined DFA results identified 227 of 230 B. anthracis isolates; all 56 strains of the other Bacillus species were negative (16).

A nonhemolytic, nonmotile Bacillus should be highly suspicious for B. anthracis. However, species like B. cereus subsp. mycoides, B. megaterium, B. firmus, and B. circulans can also be nonhemolytic and nonmotile. The community laboratory is limited in differentiating these species, which can lead to delays in diagnosis and response to potential terrorist events. This case emphasizes the need for local (level A) laboratories to increase their potential to differentiate nonmotile, nonhemolytic Bacillus in order to secure a rapid preliminary diagnosis and avoid unnecessary costly treatment. The combined DFA assay would be a potential solution. It provides sensitive and specific confirmation of B. anthracis cultures within 3 to 6 hours. The assay specificity is similar to the highest levels achieved by PCR assays, and its sensitivity is similar to that of culture or perhaps considerably greater if the patient is receiving antimicrobial agents (16).

Dr. Dib is a fellow in training in hematology/oncology at the University of Rochester-Strong Memorial Hospital in New York. His research interests include the relationship of infectious agents and carcinogenesis.



  1. Eppelmann  K, Doekel  S, Marahiel  MA. Engineered biosynthesis of the peptide antibiotic bacitracin in the surrogate host Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:3482431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sun  WQ, Meng  M, Kumar  G, Geelhaar  LA, Payne  GF, Speedie  MK, Biological denitration of propylene glycol dinitrate by Bacillus sp. ATCC 51912. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;45:5259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Moar  WJ, Trumble  JT, Hice  RH, Backman  PA. Insecticidal activity of the CryIIA protein from the NRD-12 isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki expressed in Escherichia coli and Bacillus thuringiensis and in a leaf-colonizing strain of Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:896902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaumont  M. Flavouring composition prepared by fermentation with Bacillus spp. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;75:18996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Frankel  AE, Powell  BL, Duesbery  NS, Vande Woude  GF, Leppla  SH. Anthrax fusion protein therapy of cancer. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2002;3:399407. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. York  MK. Bacillus species pseudobacteremia traced to contaminated gloves used in collection of blood from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:21146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Isaacson  P, Jacobs  PH, Mackenzie  AM, Mathews  AW. Pseudotumour of the lung caused by infection with Bacillus sphaericus. J Clin Pathol. 1976;29:80611. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Reller  LB. Endocarditis caused by Bacillus subtilis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973;60:7148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Thuler  LCS, Velasco  E, de Souza Martins  CAD, de Faria  LM, da Fonseca  NP, Dias  LM, An outbreak of Bacillus species in a cancer hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19:8568. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Swartz  MN. Recognition and management of anthrax: an update. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:16216. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Heller  MB, Bunning  ML, France  ME, Niemeyer  DM, Peruski  L, Naimi  T, Laboratory response to anthrax bioterrorism, New York City, 2001. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:1096102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Perkins  BA, Popovic  T, Yeskey  K. Public health in the time of bioterrorism. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:10158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Khan  AS, Morse  S, Lillibridge  S. Public-health preparedness for biologic terrorism in the USA. Lancet. 2000;356:117982. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller  JM. Agents of bioterrorism. Preparing for bioterrorism at the community health care level. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2001;15:112756. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Quinn  CP, Semenova  VA, Elie  CM, Romero-Steiner  S, Greene  C, Li  H, Specific, sensitive, and quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human immunoglobulin G antibodies to anthrax toxin protective antigen. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:110410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De  BK, Bragg  SL, Sanden  GN, Wilson  KE, Diem  LA, Marston  CK, A two-component direct fluorescent-antibody assay for rapid identification of Bacillus anthracis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:10605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schuch  R, Nelson  D, Fischetti  VA. A bacteriolytic agent that detects and kills Bacillus anthracis. Nature. 2002;418:8849. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmaster  A, Meyer  R, Bowen  M, Marston  CK, Weyant  RS, Thurman  K, Evaluation and validation of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of Bacillus anthracis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:117882.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffmaster  A, Fitzgerald  C, Ribot  E, Mayer  LW, Popovic  T. Molecular subtyping of Bacillus anthracis and the 2001 bioterrorism-associated anthrax outbreak, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:11116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sacchi  CT, Whitney  AM, Mayer  LW, Morey  R, Steigerwalt  A, Boras  A, Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene: a rapid tool for identification of Bacillus anthracis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:111723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Quintiliani  R Jr, Quintiliani  R. Fatal case of inhalational anthrax mimicking intra-abdominal sepsis. Conn Med. 2002;66:2617.PubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0908.030205

Table of Contents – Volume 9, Number 8—August 2003

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Elie G. Dib, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; fax: 585-273-1051

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 22, 2010
Page updated: December 22, 2010
Page reviewed: December 22, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.