Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 9—September 2023
Research Letter

Partial Genome Characterization of Novel Parapoxvirus in Horse, Finland

Author affiliations: University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (J. Virtanen, L. Dutra, I. Plyusnin, K. Hautala, T. Smura, O. Vapalahti, T. Sironen, R. Kant, P.M. Kinnunen); Finnish Food Authority, Helsinki (M. Hautaniemi); Medical University of Gdansk, Gdynia, Poland (R. Kant)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We report a sequencing protocol and 121-kb poxvirus sequence from a clinical sample from a horse in Finland with dermatitis. Based on phylogenetic analyses, the virus is a novel parapoxvirus associated with a recent epidemic; previous data suggest zoonotic potential. Increased awareness of this virus and specific diagnostic protocols are needed.

Parapoxviruses (PPVs) usually cause contagious skin infections in ruminants and occasionally infect other species such as humans (1). The genus Parapoxvirus encompasses the following recognized species: Orf virus, bovine papular stomatitis virus, pseudocowpoxvirus, red deerpox virus, and grey sealpox virus (GSEPV) (2). All of those, except GSEPV and red deerpox virus, are zoonotic. PPV genomes are usually 130–140 kb (2). Recently, poxviruses have emerged in humans and horses (3,4).

A severe infection caused by a parapox-like virus (F14.1158H) was first verified from a horse euthanized in Finland in 2013 (5). According to the short sequences (1.1 kb in total) obtained from envelope phospholipase (open reading frame [ORF] 011) and RNA polymerase subunit RPO147 (ORF056) genes, F14.1158H is most closely related to PPVs and is similar to the 585-bp sequences detected in lesions from humans after contact with horses and donkeys in the United States (5,6). However, the actual classification remained unclear because of limited sequence data and lack of amplification in numerous PPV PCR assays (5). No other clinical cases were confirmed until 2022, when an epidemic of dermatitis emerged in horses across Finland. PPV infection was subsequently identified in several cases using pan-PPV PCR (7) and Sanger sequencing (Appendix). Partial ORF011 sequences were 97% identical to the sequences from the 2013 case, with identity of 79%–87% to other PPVs (Appendix Table). This finding highlighted the need to properly characterize F14.1158H.

To better characterize the virus, we analyzed DNA extracted directly from a skin lesion of the 2013 equine case (5) and subjected it to next-generation sequencing with 2 different protocols (Appendix). The first protocol, relying on a pool of poxvirus primers, was insufficient to acquire enough sequence data. With a PCR-free approach, using enrichment of the viral DNA, we acquired as much as 121 kb of nucleotide sequence, almost the full genome, with coverage values of ≈100 in 5 contigs (BioProject no. PRJNA922554; GenBank accession nos. OQ248663–7). We noted the overall guanine-cytosine content to be 68.4%, which is similar to that of PPVs (2). We were unable to fully assemble and orient the data because we had no reference genome, a critical component in future investigations like ours. The lack of high-quality DNA and unsuccessful virus isolation attempts (Appendix) further complicated the sequencing process. In another study, researchers used a combination of short- and long-read sequencing to recover the full genome of the GSEPV (8). However, with our clinical sample, the small amount of DNA available for sequencing led to an alternative approach.

Figure

Phylogenies of PPV isolate F14.1158H from a skin lesion of an infected horse in Finland, 2013. A) Grouping of F14.1158H among all the genera of the subfamily Chordopoxvirinae in a phylogenetic tree based on amino acid sequences of the DNA polymerase (ORF025) gene. B–D) Grouping of F141158H among the genus Parapoxvirus in phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of the early transcription factor (ORF083) (B), RNA polymerase (ORF101) (C), and topoisomerase 1 (ORF062) (D) genes. Bootstrap values >70% are shown next to the nodes. GenBank accession numbers are provided for reference sequences. MsEPV is used as an outgroup in panel A and SQPV and MOCV in panels B–D. Findings indicate that F14.1158H represents a novel PPV, designated EqPPV. CPXV, cowpox virus; CRV, crocodilepox virus; DPV, deerpox virus; EMCLV, equine molluscum contagiosum-like virus; EqPPV, equine PPV; FWPV, fowlpox virus; MOCV, molluscum contagiosum virus; MPXV, monkeypox virus; MsEPV, melanoplus sanguinipes entomopoxvirus; MYXV, myxoma virus; ORF, open reading frame; PPV, parapoxvirus; SPPV, sheeppox virus; SQPV, squirrelpox virus; SWPV, swinepox virus; VACV, vaccinia virus; YMTV, yaba monkey tumor virus.

Figure. Phylogenies of PPV isolate F14.1158H from a skin lesion of an infected horse in Finland, 2013. A) Grouping of F14.1158H among all the genera of the subfamily Chordopoxvirinae in a...

We conducted phylogenetic analysis for the following poxvirus core genes (9) (ORF numbers designated according to PPV ORFs) (10): DNA polymerase (ORF025), early transcription factor (ORF083), DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit RPO132 (ORF101), and DNA topoisomerase type 1 (ORF062) (Figure). Consistent with earlier observations based on partial sequences of ORF11 and ORF056, F14.1158H grouped clearly closer to PPVs than other poxviruses (Figure, panel A), although distinctly separate from the 5 recognized species (Figure, panels B–D). We found the amino acid sequences to be more similar to PPV species than to other chordopoxviruses. For example, amino acid identity of DNA polymerase was 46%–60% between F14.1158H and viruses from other genera, 76%–80% between F14.1158H and PPVs, and 84%–95% among the previously recognized PPV species (Appendix Table 3). Within the PPVs, F14.1158H generally showed the second lowest pairwise nucleotide identity of the group (after the most divergent GSEPV) (Table); identities to other PPVs were 74%–83% (ORF025), 73%–83% (ORF083), 78%–87% (ORF101), and 84%–91% (ORF062). GSEPV was consistently furthest from F14.1158H, whereas F14.1158H identities to other PPVs were similar. A relatively high difference explains why F14.1158H was not detected by several PCRs designed for detecting PPV, which should be considered when designing diagnostic protocols. These phylogenetic results and sequence identities, together with the high guanine and cytosine content and disease characteristics, indicate that F14.1158H represents a novel PPV, designated equine parapoxvirus (EqPPV). The final taxonomic position and the possible differences of human and equine-derived variants (6) will require more data.

Most known PPVs are zoonotic, and any novel virus detected in animals should be treated with concern (6). Thus, considering the tendency of PPVs to cause diseases in humans, EqPPV has a zoonotic potential. It is therefore important to sample humans and other animals in contact with infected horses. It is also critical to establish diagnostic protocols due to low specificity and sensitivity of pan-PPV PCR for EqPPV (Appendix). In terms of veterinary importance, this virus poses a threat for horses that could translate to financial losses for owners. The information provided here will inform development of proper diagnostic tools and also enable establishment of prevention measures.

Ms. Virtanen is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Helsinki in the field of clinical microbiology. Her research interests include zoonotic viruses and pathogens in human–animal interface.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Niina Airas for her expert support regarding equine medicine. We also thank Mira Utriainen for technical assistance.

This study was financially supported by the Niemi Foundation, Finnish Foundation of Veterinary Research, and the Erkki Rajakoski Fund of Hippos Finland.

Top

References

  1. Essbauer  S, Pfeffer  M, Meyer  H. Zoonotic poxviruses. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:22936. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McInnes  CJ, Damon  IK, Smith  GL, McFadden  G, Isaacs  SN, Roper  RL, et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Poxviridae 2023. J Gen Virol. 2023;104:00184. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Capobianchi  MR, Di Caro  A, Piubelli  C, Mori  A, Bisoffi  Z, Castilletti  C. Monkeypox 2022 outbreak in non-endemic countries: Open questions relevant for public health, nonpharmacological intervention and literature review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1005955. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ehmann  R, Brandes  K, Antwerpen  M, Walter  M, V Schlippenbach  K, Stegmaier  E, et al. Molecular and genomic characterization of a novel equine molluscum contagiosum-like virus. J Gen Virol. 2021;102:001357. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Airas  N, Hautaniemi  M, Syrjä  P, Knuuttila  A, Putkuri  N, Coulter  L, et al. Infection with possible novel parapoxvirus in horse, Finland, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:12425. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Osadebe  LU, Manthiram  K, McCollum  AM, Li  Y, Emerson  GL, Gallardo-Romero  NF, et al. Novel poxvirus infection in 2 patients from the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:195202. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Inoshima  Y, Morooka  A, Sentsui  H. Detection and diagnosis of parapoxvirus by the polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods. 2000;84:2018. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Günther  T, Haas  L, Alawi  M, Wohlsein  P, Marks  J, Grundhoff  A, et al. Recovery of the first full-length genome sequence of a parapoxvirus directly from a clinical sample. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3734. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yu  Z, Zhang  W, Fu  H, Zou  X, Zhao  M, Liang  S, et al. Genomic analysis of Poxviridae and exploring qualified gene sequences for phylogenetics. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:547986. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hautaniemi  M, Ueda  N, Tuimala  J, Mercer  AA, Lahdenperä  J, McInnes  CJ. The genome of pseudocowpoxvirus: comparison of a reindeer isolate and a reference strain. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:156076. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2909.230049

Original Publication Date: August 09, 2023

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 9—September 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jenni Virtanen, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, PO Box 66 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 09, 2023
Page updated: August 20, 2023
Page reviewed: August 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external