Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 2—February 2004
THEME ISSUE
2004 SARS Edition
Infection Control

SARS Transmission among Hospital Workers in Hong Kong

Joseph T.F. Lau*Comments to Author , Kitty S. Fung*, Tze Wai Wong*, Jean H. Kim*, Eric Wong*, Sydney Chung*, Deborah Ho*, Louis Y. Chan*, S.F. Lui†, and Augustine Cheng*
Author affiliations: *Chinese University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China (SAR); †Hospital Authority, Government of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR

Main Article

Table 5

Percentage distribution of the number of problems encountered by the hospital workera

Number of problems encounteredb Control
Case
Matched OR
(exact 95% CI) p value
(exact)
n % Cumulative % n % cumulative %
0
27
20.1
20.1
1
1.4
1.4
1.00

1
65
48.5
68.6
21
30.4
31.8
8.47(1.37 to ∞)
0.0169
2
24
17.9
86.5
17
24.6
56.4
17.78(2.67 to ∞)
0.0010
>3c.d 18 13.4 100.0 30 43.5 100.0 44.15(7.02 to ∞)) <0.0001

aExcluded nine controls and thee cases that had at least one missing entry on one of the problems encountered.
bThe seven problems are: 1) inconsistent use of at least 1 type of personal protection equipment when having contact with SARS patients, 2) with “patients in general,” 3) when there was “no patient contact,” 4) when SARS infection control training was less than 2 hours, 5) when the respondent reported not understanding SARS infection control procedures, 6) when at least one personal protection equipment was perceived to be in inadequate supply in the 3 settings, and 7) when hand hygiene was inconsistent when there was “no patient contact.”
cPercentages of the number of problems encountered in the control group: 3 problems (6.7%), 4 problems (4.5%), 5 (1.5%), 6 (0.7%), and 7 (0%).
dPercentages of the number of problems encountered in the case group: 3 problems (10.1%), 4 (8.7%), 5 (13.0%), 6 (8.7%), and 7 (2.9%).

Main Article

Page created: January 25, 2011
Page updated: January 25, 2011
Page reviewed: January 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external