Volume 8, Number 9—September 2002
Research
Behavioral, Physiologic, and Habitat Influences on the Dynamics of Puumala virus Infection in Bank Voles (Clethrionomys glareolus)
Sophie Escutenaire*
, Patrice Chalon†, Florence de Jaegere, Lucie Karelle-Bui†, Georges Mees†, Bernard Brochier*, Francine Rozenfeld, and Paul-Pierre Pastoret†
, Patrice Chalon†, Florence de Jaegere, Lucie Karelle-Bui†, Georges Mees†, Bernard Brochier*, Francine Rozenfeld, and Paul-Pierre Pastoret†
Table 2
Prevalence of Puumala virus infection in adult bank voles, by presence of wounds
| Trapping season | Wounded % positive (no. tested) | Not wounded % positive (no. tested) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring 1997 | 0.0 (1) | 21.4 (28) | |
| Fall 1997 | 20.0 (10) | 8.6 (93) | |
| Spring 1998 | 6.3 (16) | 6.9 (29) | |
| Fall 1998 | 15.3 (72) | 5.9 (51) | |
| Spring 1999 | 68.2 (66) | 68.3 (123) | |
| Fall 1999 | 68.4 (19) | 36.4 (22) | p=0.04; χ2=4.19 |
| Spring (1997–1999) | 55.4 (83) | 51.1 (180) | |
| Fall (1997–1999) | 25.7 (101) | 11.4 (166) | p<0.01; χ2=9.16 |
Page created: July 16, 2010
Page updated: July 16, 2010
Page reviewed: July 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.