Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 6—June 2004
Letter

Diagnostic Criteria during SARS Outbreak in Hong Kong

Louis Y. Chan*, Nelson Lee†Comments to Author , Paul K.S. Chan†, Alan Wu†, Timothy H. Rainer†, Philip K.T. Li*, Hong Fung*, and Joseph JY Sung†
Author affiliations: *Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region (SAR); †The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR

Main Article

Table

SARS contact history and demographic and initial laboratory parameters in seropositive and seronegative patients

Seropositive patients, n = 353 (%) Seronegative patients, n = 2 (%) p value or OR (95% CI)a
Demographic data
Age 40.9 ± 17.2 51.2 ± 24.3 0.008
Healthcare workers 193 (54.7) 2 (9.1) 12.1 (2.8 to 52.4)
Non-HCW 160 (45.3) 20 (90.9)
Laboratory parameters on admission
Total leukocyte count (x 109/L) 6.2 ± 3.2 9.4 ± 7.4 <0.001
Lymphocyte count (x 109/L) 1.0 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.8 0.027
Level of contact
Definite close contact 322 (91.2) 7 (31.8) 22.3 (8.4 to 58.7)
Possible contact 31 (8.8) 15 (68.2)
Possible contact plus lymphopenia
Lymphocyte < 0.8 x 109/L 13 (76.5) 4 (23.5)
Lymphocyte < 1.0 x 109/L 21 (72.4) 8 (27.6)
Venue of contact
Hospital 290 (82.2) 8 (36.4) 8.1 (3.2 to 20.0)
Community 63 (17.8) 14 (63.6)

aOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Main Article

Page created: February 22, 2011
Page updated: February 22, 2011
Page reviewed: February 22, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external