Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005

SARS-CoV Sampling from 3 Portals

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Wang et al. detected severe acute respiratory syndrome–associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) from throat wash and saliva specimens and suggested that these specimens have advantages over other specimens, including ease of procurement and safety for medical personnel (1). The virus has been detected with variable success from nasopharyngeal aspirates, nose and throat swabs, and tears (2,3). Advocates of all of these sampling methods emphasize the need for early diagnosis of SARS. The probability for nosocomial transmission to healthcare workers when they obtain specimens from patients has not been adequately addressed. In a study of outbreak control for SARS, Chowell et al. suggest “… the strong sensitivity of R0 to the transmission rate β indicates that efforts in finding intervention strategies that manage to systematically lower the contact rate of persons of all age groups promise an effective means for lowering R0” (4).

An important component of a comprehensive strategy to lower the contact rate is improving the safety measures recommended for clinical specimen collection by healthcare workers. Recognizing the importance of obtaining multiple specimens and the difficulties associated with obtaining samples from the 3 usual portals of entry, we devised and tested a novel method of specimen collection, conjunctiva–upper respiratory tract irrigation (5). We coupled our specimen collection method with detailed written instructions to enable the patients themselves to perform the entire procedures. Almost all other specimen collection methods require assistance from healthcare workers or have other limitations, such as inability to sample all 3 portals. The method is not perfect because some persons have difficulty performing the procedure; however, self-instillation of the irrigation into the nostrils, with or without the addition of a throat wash or saliva, is likely to improve the success rate. The data supplied by Loon et al. (3) and Wang et al. (1) confirm that collecting specimens by a method that involves minimal contact between a possible source of infection and susceptible persons is desirable.



The author has shares of a company that owns a patent-pending conjunctiva-upper respiratory tract irrigation system.


Tommy R. Tong*Comments to Author 
Author affiliation: *Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, China



  1. Wang  WK, Chen  SY, Liu  IJ, Chen  YC, Chen  HL, Yang  CF, Detection of SARS-associated coronavirus in throat wash and saliva in early diagnosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:12139.PubMed
  2. Chan  PK, To  WK, Ng  KC, Lam  RK, Ng  TK, Chan  RC, Laboratory diagnosis of SARS. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:82531.PubMed
  3. Loon  SC, Teoh  SC, Oon  LL, Se-Thoe  SY, Ling  AE, Leo  YS, The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in tears. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:8613. DOIPubMed
  4. Chowell  G, Castillo-Chavez  C, Fenimore  PW, Kribs-Zaleta  CM, Arriola  L, Hyman  JM. Model parameters and outbreak control for SARS. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:125863.PubMed
  5. Tong  TR, Lam  BH, Ng  TK, Lai  ST, Tong  MK, Chau  TN. Conjunctiva–upper respiratory tract irrigation for early diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5352. DOIPubMed


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1101.040645

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005


Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Tommy R Tong, Department of Pathology, Room P-725, Block P, 7/F, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong; fax: +852-29903377

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 15, 2011
Page updated: April 15, 2011
Page reviewed: April 15, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.