Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005
Kytococcus schroeteri Endocarditis
To the Editor: Becker et al. recently reported the probable implication of Kytococcus schroeteri in a case of acute prosthetic valve endocarditis, on the basis of its recovery from blood cultures drawn at the time of infection (1). K. schroeteri was only characterized on that occasion and is a new micrococcal species resistant to penicillins (2). Here, we report the isolation of this organism from prosthetic valve vegetations in a patient who had undergone aortic valve replacement 3 years earlier. The 73-year-old man was admitted with fever (38.8°C) and shortness of breath, which had both increased gradually over the previous 2 months. He had no recent history of intravenous drug administration or catheterization. Laboratory findings showed a leukocyte count of 12 x 109/L (90% neutrophils) and a raised C-reactive protein level. Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed several small vegetations on the Carpentier-Edwards aortic bioprosthesis and a voluminous perivalvular abscess. Four sets of blood cultures were drawn before antimicrobial therapy was inititiated.
Intravenous vancomycin (2 g twice a day) and gentamicin (240 mg/d) were started empirically. The prosthetic material was replaced promptly and the abscess was debrided extensively. Vegetations from the resected material showed numerous polymorphonuclear neutrophils and gram-positive cocci on microscopic examination. Oral rifampicin (600 mg twice a day) was added to the initial regimen.
The postoperative course was uneventful except for cutaneous intolerance to vancomycin, which was replaced with teicoplanin. The physical condition of the patient improved steadily. Gentamicin and rifampicin were discontinued after 3 weeks. Eight months after completion of the 6-week treatment, the patient had no clinical or biologic evidence of infection, although moderate aortic incompetence persisted.
All blood cultures drawn on admission grew gram-positive cocci after 72 hours and subcultures on Trypticase soy agar yielded convex, muddy–yellow colonies of heterogeneous sizes. The vegetations, pus samples of the abscess, and prosthetic valve cultures grew the same type of colonies. All isolates displayed identical biotype and antimicrobial susceptibility and were considered as a single strain. The causative organism (designated ROG140) was initially identified as Micrococcus sp. based on the morphologic features, resistance to nitrofurantoin, and inability to grow anaerobically. Assignment to the genus Kytococcus was suggested by the arginine dihydrolase activity and resistance to oxacillin, 2 characteristics that are not shared by other micrococci (3).
The definitive K. schroeteri identification was provided by analysis of the fatty acid content, which was similar to that of the type strain (2), and sequencing of the 16S rRNA genes. We sequenced a 1,012-bp fragment encompassing the first two thirds of the 16S rDNA of ROG140 (accession no. AY692224). The sequence was compared with type strains of all members of the former genus Micrococcus, and a phylogenetic tree was deduced by the neighbor–joining method (Figure). The sequences of ROG140 and the K. schroeteri type strain only differ by an A-to-G substitution at position 747 (E. coli numbering). Among the 21 nucleotide differences between the sequences of K. schroeteri and the closely related species K. sedentarius, 10 are located on a 30-base stretch and constitute a convenient K. schroeteri signature (Figure)
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed with the disk diffusion method and E-tests (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) indicated that the isolate was resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, kanamycin, tobramycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, sulfonamides, and fusidic acid, but susceptible to imipenem (MIC, 0.25 μg/mL), gentamicin (MIC, 1 μg/mL), trimethoprim (MIC, 0.25 μg/mL), tetracycline (MIC, 0.12 μg/mL), linezolid (MIC, 0.25 μg/mL), vancomycin (MIC, 0.125 μg/mL), teicoplanin (MIC, 0.06 μg/mL), and rifampicin (MIC, <0.002 μg/mL). Unlike the original isolate reported by Becker et al. (1), isolate ROG140 was resistant to ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (MICs, 8 μg/mL). Conversely, moxifloxacin displayed excellent in vitro activity (MIC, 0.05 μg/mL). As moxifloxacin was more rapidly microbicidal than vancomycin in an animal model of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve endocarditis (4), it might present a potential advantage against infections caused by K. schroeteri, especially when the oral route is favored.
The natural habitat of K. schroeteri remains unknown. The only isolates of K. schroeteri identified so far originated from blood or cardiac material, although Kytococcus literally means “a coccus from the skin.” Our attempts to recover K. schroeteri from the mouth, nose, or skin of our patient were unsuccessful. In a recent study, Szczerba et al. were able to isolate most micrococcal species, including K. sedentarius but not K. schroeteri, from human skin and mucosa (5). However, at that time the authors may not have been aware of this newly described species. The mode of contamination also remains unclear. In the original description (1), K. schroeteri endocarditis had developed in the patient <3 months after she underwent cardiac surgery, which suggested perioperative contamination. Here, we describe a late onset, subacute infection 3 years after surgery, which is more likely to have been caused by hematogenous spread.
Although Micrococcus-like organisms cause endocarditis infrequently (6), the description of 2 independent infections due to a new species in a short period is intriguing and suggests a specific pathogenicity, at least on prosthetic heart devices. By demonstrating the presence of the bacteria in the infected site, this report establishes K. schroeteri as a genuine pathogen in this clinical setting and should prompt further investigations to identify its natural habitat and virulence determinants. At present, commercial systems are not able to identify K. schroeteri. However, gram-positive cocci that are strictly aerobic, oxacillin-resistant, and arginine dihydrolase-positive should be recognized as potential Kytococcus species and taken into account when endocarditis is suspected.
- Becker K, Wüllenweber J, Odenthal HJ, Moeller M, Schumann P, Peters G, Prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Kytococcus schroeteri. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1493–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker K, Schumann P, Wüllenweber J, Schulte M, Weil HP, Stackebrandt E, Kytococcus schroeteri sp. nov., a novel gram-positive actinobacterium isolated from a human clinical source. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1609–14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stackebrandt E, Koch C, Gvozdiak O, Schumann P. Taxonomic dissection of the genus Micrococcus: Kocuria gen. nov., Nesterenkonia gen. nov., Kytococcus gen. nov., Dermacoccus gen. nov., and Micrococcus Cohn 1872 gen. emend. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:682–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Entenza JM, Que YA, Vouillamoz J, Glauser MP, Moreillon P. Efficacies of moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin against experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing various degrees of ciprofloxacin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:3076–83. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szczerba I, Krzeminski Z. Occurrence and number of bacteria from the Micrococcus, Kocuria, Nesterenkonia, Kytococcus and Dermacoccus genera on skin and mucous membranes in humans. Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2002;55:67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seifert H, Kaltheuner M, Perdreau-Remington F. Micrococcus luteus endocarditis: case report and review of the literature. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1995;282:431–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
FigureCite This Article
Table of Contents – Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005
|EID Search Options|
|Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.|
|Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.|
|Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Olivier Gaillot, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Faculté de Médecine-Université de Rennes 1, 35033 Rennes, France; fax: + 33 2 99 28 41 59