Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 6—June 2006

Epidemic Clostridium difficile Strain in Hospital Visitation Dog

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Rates of illness and death from Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) and reports of CDAD in persons without traditional risk factors (1) have been increasing. One particular strain of C. difficile has been implicated in outbreaks of CDAD in hospitals in North America and Europe and appears to be spreading internationally at an alarming rate. This strain is classified as ribotype 027, toxinotype III, and possesses genes encoding toxins A, B, and CDT (binary toxin) as well as a deletion in the tcdC gene, which is believed to increase virulence (2).

We report this toxin-variant strain of C. difficile in a healthy, 4-year-old toy poodle that visits persons in hospitals and long-term care facilities in Ontario on a weekly basis. C. difficile was isolated from a fecal sample collected in the summer of 2004 as part of a cross-sectional study evaluating pathogen carriage by visitation dogs (3). The isolate was subsequently characterized by ribotyping (4) and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of genes that encode production of toxins A and B (5). Toxin CDT was confirmed by amplifying the portion of the gene (cdtB) that encodes for the receptor-binding component of the toxin, according to a previously reported protocol (6). As a result, the isolate was classified as ribotype 027, toxinotype III (7), and was found to possess all 3 toxin genes. The tcdC gene deletion was also confirmed with PCR (8).

These results indicate that this canine isolate is indistinguishable from the major strain implicated in outbreaks of highly virulent CDAD around the world. According to the infection control practitioner at the hospital the dog visited, CDAD cases were occurring at increased frequency in the facility around the time the dog’s fecal specimen was collected. However, patient diagnosis was made solely through fecal toxin testing, and strains were not characterized. The facility has reported only sporadic cases of CDAD in the past few years.

This is the first report of this human, epidemic strain of C. difficile in a dog. Many C. difficile strains isolated from animals, including dogs, are indistinguishable from strains associated with disease in humans (9). To date, no study, including this one, has shown that interspecies transmission occurs; however, that possibility exists, as is becoming apparent with other pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The recurrent exposure of this dog to human healthcare settings suggests that the animal acquired this strain during visits to the hospital or long-term care facility, either from the healthcare environment or contaminated hands of human contacts. We recommend that future studies evaluating the dissemination of this strain and investigations of the movement of C. difficile into the community consider the role of animals.



We thank Joyce Rousseau for her assistance with culturing and identifying strains of C. difficile.

This work was supported by the Pet Trust Foundation of the Ontario Veterinary College.


Sandra L. Lefebvre*Comments to Author , Luis G. Arroyo*, and J. Scott Weese*
Author affiliations: *University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada



  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe Clostridium difficile–associated disease in populations previously at low risk—four states, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:12015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Warny  M, Pepin  J, Fang  A, Killgore  G, Thompson  A, Brazier  J, Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet. 2005;366:107984. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lefebvre  SL, Waltner-Toews  D, Peregrine  AS, Reid-Smith  R, Hodge  L, Arroyo  LG, Prevalence of zoonotic agents in dogs visiting hospitalized people in Ontario: implications for infection control. J Hosp Infect. Epub 2006 Feb 5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbut  F, Lalande  V, Burghoffer  B, Thien  HV, Grimprel  E, Petit  JC. Prevalence and genetic characterization of toxin A variant strains of Clostridium difficile among adults and children with diarrhea in France. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:207983. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kato  H, Kato  N, Watanabe  K, Iwai  N, Nakamura  H, Yamamoto  T, Identification of toxin A–negative, toxin B–positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:217882.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Stubbs  S, Rupnik  M, Gibert  M, Brazier  J, Duerden  B, Popoff  M. Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;186:30712. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rupnik  M, Avesani  V, Janc  M, von Eichel-Streiber  C, Delmee  M. A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:22407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen  SH, Tang  YJ, Silva  J Jr. Analysis of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile strains. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:65963. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arroyo  LG, Kruth  SA, Willey  BM, Staempfli  HR, Low  DE, Weese  JS. PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile isolates originating from human and animal sources. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:1636. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1206.060115

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 6—June 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sandra L. Lefebvre, Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 04, 2012
Page updated: January 04, 2012
Page reviewed: January 04, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.