Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 10—October 2007
Letter

Compliance with Exclusion Requirements to Prevent Mumps Transmission

Stephanie M. Borchardt*1Comments to Author , Preethi Rao*, and Mark S. Dworkin*†
Author affiliations: *Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois, USA; †University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois, USA;

Main Article

Table

Reasons reported by 14 persons with mumps for not remaining home from work for any part of the exclusion period

Reason Frequency,* 
no. (%)
Did not feel ill enough to miss work 7 (50)
Did not receive mumps diagnosis until after exclusion period 5 (36)
Was not told to remain at home 3 (21)
Could not financially afford to miss work 2 (14)
Too busy to miss work 1 (7)
No sick leave available 1 (7)

*Some persons reported >1 reason for not remaining home from work.

Main Article

1Current affiliation: Fargo Veterans Administration Medical Center, Fargo, North Dakota, USA

Page created: July 02, 2010
Page updated: July 02, 2010
Page reviewed: July 02, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external