Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 6—June 2007

Economic Evaluation and Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections

Kate Halton*†Comments to Author  and Nicholas Graves*†
Author affiliations: *The Centre for Healthcare Related Infection Surveillance and Prevention, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; †Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Main Article

Table 4

Assessment of published evaluations and good practice criteria for decision models

Attributes of good practice criteria No. models meeting criterion, 
n = 8
  Perspective specified 8
  Description of strategies/comparators 8
  Diagram of model/disease pathways 6
  Development of model structure and assumptions discussed 4
  Table of model input parameters presented 5
  Source of parameters clearly stated 8
  Model parameters expressed as distributions 3
  Model assumptions discussed 7
  Sensitivity analysis performed 8
  Key drivers/influential parameters identified 6
  Statement about test of internal consistency undertaken 1

Main Article

Page created: July 05, 2010
Page updated: July 05, 2010
Page reviewed: July 05, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.