Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008

Avian Mycoplasma lipofaciens Transmission to Veterinarian

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Mycoplasma spp. are well-known pathogens in human and veterinary medicine. Mammals, especially primates and including humans, share similar or even identical Mycoplasma spp., which might be commensal or pathogenic (1). Additionally, sporadic infections of immunocompromised persons with Mycoplasma spp. that originated from domestic animals have been reported (1); susceptibility in this human population is increased (2,3). M. phocicerebrale is the only Mycoplasma pathogen of animals that regularly infects humans, causing a disease called seal fingers (1,4). However, we report a human infection with an avian Mycoplasma organism.

A clinical trial to investigate the capability of M. lipofaciens (strain ML64) (5) to spread horizontally between infected and noninfected turkey poults in an incubator demonstrated airborne transmission of the pathogen within 24 hours (6). During the trial, the veterinarian conducting the study, a 36-year-old man, was monitored for infection. Each day, 2 swabs were taken from both nostrils, starting from the day before the infected poults hatched (day 0) through day 7 after the poult hatching date. When handling eggs and poults, the veterinarian wore gloves but not a protective mask. Two days after the poults hatched (day 3), the veterinarian reported throat pain and a slight rhinitis, which indicated a respiratory disease. The next day only the rhinitis with minor nasal pain was present.

One nasal swab from each sampling day was used for Mycoplasma spp. culture (5). Isolated Mycoplasma organisms were subjected to an immunobinding assay (6) with antiserum against M. lipofaciens, M. buteonis, M. falconis, M. gypis, M. gallisepticum, M. meleagridis, M. synoviae, and M. iowae, selected because the veterinarian regularly handled these isolates. The second nasal swab from each sampling day was taken to detect Mycoplasma DNA by PCR (5). The samples for PCR testing were stored at –20°C and tested only when attempts to isolate Mycoplasma spp. failed.

Six weeks after the infection, a serum sample from the patient was examined for specific antibodies against M. lipofaciens by 3 different methods: modified immunobinding assay (6) (which used patient’s serum and peroxidase-conjugated goat-antihuman serum [STAR90P, Serotec Ltd, Oxford, UK]), a growth inhibition test, and antibody titers of serum dilutions. The first 2 methods used M. lipofaciens (strain ML64) from a turkey trial (6) and the reference strains of M. buteonis (Bb/T2g) and M. falconis (H/T1). For the third method, to determine the titer, 2-fold serial dilutions of the patient’s serum samples were prepared and incubated with a bacterial suspension (M. lipofaciens strain ML64) containing 3.2 × 102 CFU. The antibody titer was based on the highest serum dilution capable of reducing 50% of the mean CFU count.

Before the infected poults hatched, attempts to isolate Mycoplasma organisms and demonstrate Mycoplasma DNA from the nasal swabs were unsuccessful. However, from the day of hatching (day 1) until 3 days later (day 4), Mycoplasma organisms were isolated from the nasal swabs and identified as M. lipofaciens. On day 5, only Mycoplasma DNA was demonstrated (Table). Specific antibodies against M. lipofaciens (strain ML64) were detected by using the immunobinding assay and growth inhibition test. Antibodies against other Mycoplasma spp. were not detected. Antibody titer against M. lipofaciens was 128.

M. lipofaciens have been reported from a chicken, turkey, duck (7,8), and a raptor egg (5). Strain ML64 is highly pathogenic for chicken and turkey embryos and can be transmitted by air (6,9). The veterinarian handling the infected poults was free of nasal Mycoplasma organisms a day before contact. His infection occurred concurrent with demonstration of airborne transmission among poults. The isolation of M. lipofaciens from his nares for 4 days demonstrates the infectivity and reproductive capability of this Mycoplasma strain in humans: as a pure contaminant, isolation for several days would be unlikely. Christensen et al. (10) have reisolated different avian Mycoplasma strains (M. gallisepticum, M. synoviae, M. iowae) from a human nose, from 12 hours through 1 day after artificial infection, demonstrating differences between avian strain abilities to survive on human mucosa. M. lipofaciens invasiveness for humans is underscored by finding specific antibodies against this species 6 weeks after infection. Cross-reactivity to other Mycoplasma spp. cannot be excluded but seems unlikely.

This study suggests that M. lipofaciens (strain ML64) can be transmitted successfully to humans and may cause clinical symptoms; the study documents nonartificial human infection with an avian Mycoplasma sp. These findings should be considered especially for humans highly susceptible to Mycoplasma infections, including children and persons with congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies (2,3).



We thank Janet Bradbury for providing the Mycoplasma antiserum used in the immunobinding assay as well as the reference strains used.


Michael Lierz*Comments to Author , Andreas Jansen†, and Hafez M. Hafez*
Author affiliations: *Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; †Robert Koch Institute, Berlin;



  1. Pitcher  DG, Nicholas  RAJ. Mycoplasma host specificity: Fact or fiction? Vet J. 2005;170:3006. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Roifman  CM, Rao  CP, Lederman  HM, Lavi  S, Quinn  P, Gelfand  EW. Increased susceptibility to Mycoplasma infection in patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia. Am J Med. 1986;80:5904. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baseman  JB, Tully  JG. Mycoplasma: sophisticated, reemerging, and burdened by their notoriety. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:2132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker  AS, Ruoff  KL, Madoff  S. Isolation of Mycoplasma species from a patient with seal finger. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:116870. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lierz  M, Hagen  N, Harcourt-Brown  N, Hernandez-Divers  SJ, Lueschow  D, Hafez  HM. Prevalence of mycoplasmas in eggs from birds of prey using culture and a genus-specific mycoplasma polymerase chain reaction. Avian Pathol. 2007;36:14550. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lierz  M, Deppenmeier  S, Gruber  AD, Brokat  S, Hafez  HM. Pathogenicity of Mycoplasma lipofaciens strain ML64 for turkey embryos. Avian Pathol. 2007;36:38993. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury  JM, Forrest  M, Williams  A. Mycoplasma lipofaciens, a new species of avian origin. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983;33:32935.
  8. Bencina  D, Dorrer  D, Tadina  T. Mycoplasma species isolated from six avian species. Avian Pathol. 1987;16:65364. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lierz  M, Stark  R, Brokat  S, Hafez  HM. Pathogenicity of M. lipofaciens strain ML64, isolated from an egg of a Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), for chicken embryos. Avian Pathol. 2007;36:1513. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen  NH, Yavari  CA, McBai  AJ, Bradbury  JM. Investigations into the survival of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Mycoplasma synoviae and Mycoplasma iowae on materials found in the poultry house environment. Avian Pathol. 1994;23:12743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1407.071703

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Michael Lierz, Institute for Poultry Diseases, Free University of Berlin, Königsweg 63, 14163 Berlin, Germany;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 12, 2010
Page updated: July 12, 2010
Page reviewed: July 12, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.