Volume 15, Number 5—May 2009
Dispatch
Possible Seasonality of Clostridium difficile in Retail Meat, Canada
Table 2
Molecular characteristics of 15 representative Clostridium difficile strains isolated from 13 of 214 retail meat packages tested in Canada, 2006*
Type† | % (no.) | Toxin genes‡ | tcdC deletion | Toxinotype | PFGE§ | Product–culture | Month | Province |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M26 | 23.1 (3) | A–B–, cdtB– | NA | Nontypeable | Unnamed | VC–C3 | Feb | QC |
– | GB–C2 | Jan | ON | |||||
– | GB–C2 | Jun | SK | |||||
077¶ | 23.1 (3) | A+B+, cdtB– | No | 0 | NAP2 | GB–C3 | Jan | QC |
– | GB–C1 | Jan | ON | |||||
– | GB–C3 | Jan | QC | |||||
J¶ | 23.1 (3) | A+B+, cdtB+ | 18 bp | III | NAP1 | GB–C4 | May | ON |
NAP1a | GB–C4 | Jun | ON | |||||
– | VC–C4 | Feb | QC | |||||
014¶ | 15.4 (2) | A+B+, cdtB– | No | 0 | NAP4 | GB–C1 | May | QC |
– | GB–C2 | Jan | QC | |||||
C | 7.7 (1) | A+B+, cdtB– | No | – | – | GB–C1 | Jan | ON |
F | 7.7 (1) | A-B+, cdtB– | No | VIII | NAP9 | GB–C2 | Jan | QC |
H | 7.7(1) | A+B+, cdtB- | No | 0 | Unnamed | GB – C1 | Jun | QC |
K | 7.7(1) | A+B+, cdtB+ | 18 bp | III | NAP1-r | VC–C2 | Aug | QC |
*PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; NA, not amplified because it lacks pathogenicity locus; VC, veal chops; GB, ground beef; C1, rinsate/TCDMNB; C2, meat/TCDMNB; C3, meat/TCDMNB duplicate; C4, meat/TCFFB; QC, Québec; ON, Ontario; SK, Saskatchewan; –, not performed.
†Bidet’s PCR ribotyping method (9); 077 and 014; representative ribotypes with international nomenclatures assigned by Dr Jon Brazier, University of Wales, Wales, in a previous study (11). M26, non-toxigenic Canadian meat ribotype lacking pathogenicity locus (pers. com., M. Rupnik, University of Maribor, Slovenia) (5).
‡A, B; tcdA and tcdB genes. cdtB, binding segment of binary toxin; – and + superscripts indicate absence or presence of the gene. tcdC gene: no deletions (≈345 bp); 18 bp, deletion type B/C (8).
§Nomenclature at the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. NAP1, North America PFGE type 1.
¶Meat PCR ribotypes matching concurrent local and international human ribotypes (2,3). Note that 28 C. difficile isolates initially identified were grouped into 15 strains based on molecular characteristics and source of origin; 2 meat samples simultaneously harbored 2 strains.
References
- McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol JP, An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433–41. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin H, Willey B, Low DE, Staempfli HR, McGeer A, Boerlin P, Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolated from patients in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2999–3004. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbut F, Mastrantonio P, Delmee M, Brazier J, Kuijper E, Poxton I. European Study Group on Clostridium difficile (ESGCD). Prospective study of Clostridium difficile infections in Europe with phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:1048–57. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Staempfli HR, Duffield T, Weese JS. Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:485–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian integrated program for antimicrobial resistance surveillance (CIPARS) 2005 [cited 2008 Jan 20]. Available from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cipars-picra/index-eng.php
- Arroyo LG, Rousseau J, Willey BM, Low DE, Staempfli H, McGeer A, Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5341–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, Mattrat MA, Maillard K, Lemeland JF, Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (toxin A), and tcdB (toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5710–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spigaglia P, Mastrantonio P. Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3470–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;175:261–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rupnik M, Dupuy B, Fairweather NF, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Just I, Revised nomenclature of Clostridium difficile toxins and associated genes. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:113–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Stampfli HR, Duffield T, Peregrine AS, Trotz-Williams LA, Arroyo LG, Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in calves, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1730–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria; approved standard, seventh edition. CLSI document M11–A7; 2007:27(2) [cited 2008 May 17]. Available from http://www.clsi.org/source/orders/free/m11a7.pdf
- Songer JG, Trinh HT, Thompson AD, Killgore GE, McDonald L, Limbago BM. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from retail meats. In: Second International Clostridium difficile Symposium; June 6–9, 2007; Maribor, Slovenia. Maribor (Slovenia): Marie Curie Conferences and Training Procedures; 2007. p. 44.
- Vengust M, Arroyo LG, Weese JS, Baird JD. Preliminary evidence for dormant clostridial spores in equine skeletal muscle. Equine Vet J. 2003;35:514–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Health Service for Wales. All-Wales mandatory Clostridium difficile surveillance- 2006 report [cited 2007 Jun 21]. Available from http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/page.cfm?orgid=379&pid=18490