Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 8—August 2011

Seroepidemiology of Saffold Cardiovirus Type 2

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Saffold virus (SAFV) is a new human virus belonging to the genus Cardiovirus of the family Picornaviridae (16). The virus has also been named human Theiler’s-like cardiovirus (4). To date, 8 SAFV genotypes are known, based on molecular variation in the P1 region, which codes for the viral capsid (5). SAFVs are detected in respiratory and fecal samples from infants and children <6 years of age. The virus is generally detected at low frequency (0.5%–3%) in the general population, but in Afghanistan and Pakistan higher incidences have been reported (10%–12%) (5). Detection is mainly based on molecular techniques because virus isolation is cumbersome. Other than gastroenteritis, no clear disease manifestations are known (18), although recently, researchers in Japan have suggested that for a select group of children, SAFV infection may cause pharyngitis and tonsillitis (7). In rodents, however, cardioviruses are serious pathogens that can cause myocarditis, meningoencephalitis, and pancreatitis.

Previously, we have shown that SAFV-3 infections are ubiquitous and are transmitted early in life (6). This conclusion was based on antibody testing by virus neutralization, a highly specific test that can discriminate serotypes within a single species, but formal proof for existence of serotypes was lacking. Extrapolated to other genotypes, the finding would indicate a high infection rate for SAFVs, which is at odds with the low detection frequency reported in most studies. Most SAFV-2 isolates, from our laboratory and others, grow poorly in cell culture, which hampers reading of neutralization. Recently, however, a SAFV-2 strain was isolated in Finland that grows well in HeLa cells and shows clear cytopathic effects (SAFV-2-FIN2008, GenBank accession no. FR682076; S. Blomgvist et al., unpub. data). This strain enabled us to set up a virus neutralization test similar to that described for SAFV-3 (6). For comparison, we used strain SAFV-3(NL2007) (GenBank accession no. FM207487), which was isolated in Nijmegen (6). The virus neutralization test was performed on HeLa cells with 100 TCID50 of virus per serum dilution. Virus–serum mixtures were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C and overnight at 7°C to stabilize virus–antibody complexes (6). Human serum samples submitted previously were tested by using 3-fold dilution steps and duplicate testing (6). The results are presented in the Table. A low seroprevalence was found for SAFV-2 and SAFV-3 at 9 months of age, which is at the nadir of immunoglobulin G levels in infants. At the age of 24 months, a high seroprevalence of antibodies was found in the Netherlands for SAFV-2 and -3, pointing to early acquisition of infection with both strains. In Finland, the seroprevalence for SAFV-2 and -3 was lower in young children, which suggests somewhat lower infection rate similar to what has been reported for enteroviruses (9). A high seroprevalence of 97%–100% was found in persons >4 years of age in Cameroon, Indonesia, and the Netherlands (Table). A high prevalence of SAFV-2 antibodies was recently also reported in blood donors from the United States (8). Thus, the seroepidemiology of SAFV-2 is similar to that of SAFV-3. As depicted in the last 3 columns of the Table, on several occasions serum samples independently neutralized either SAFV-2 or SAFV-3, which suggests that the viruses behave as different serotypes.

In conclusion, SAFV-2 and SAFV-3 show an almost identical epidemiologic pattern with infection acquired early in life and with a high seroprevalence in different continents. The outcome is concordant with universal occurrence of infection by both genotypes. Because several times there was a clear discrepancy between antibody titers against one or the other of the 2 genotypes, we conclude that they behave as separate serotypes, although weak cross-reactivity (below the detection limit of 1:15) cannot be excluded. Accepting that SAFV genotypes correspond with existence of different serotypes, the infection rate in the first years of life must be quite high, similar to that for human parechoviruses and enteroviruses, which are found in 15%–18% of stool samples from children <5 years of age (10). The low SAFV detection rate remains thereby difficult to explain.

The outcome can be explained by a short duration of virus excretion in stool, which, however, is unlikely for an infection spreading by the fecal–oral route. Alternatively, it may be that the virus is unstable in stool and rapidly degrades, such that fecal samples are inadequate for diagnosis of the infection. Other specimens, however, such as respiratory samples, yielded also low numbers of positive findings (4). Remarkably, the study with a high prevalence of positive stool samples made use of primers selected in a conserved region of 2C helicase (5), whereas other studies used primers in the 5′ noncoding region (3,4). Hence, a difference in sensitivity between the different PCRs may be responsible for the discrepancy between seroepidemiology and the low diagnostic yield by PCR. This discrepancy, however, awaits further investigation.


Jochem GalamaComments to Author , Kjerstin Lanke, Jan Zoll, Merja Roivainen, and Frank van Kuppeveld
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J. Galama, K. Lanke, J. Zoll, F. van Kuppeveld); Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen (J. Galama, K. Lanke, J. Zoll, F. van Kuppeveld); Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Nijmegen (J. Galama, K. Lanke, J. Zoll, F. van Kuppeveld); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland (M. Roivainen)



  1. Jones  MS, Lukashov  VV, Ganac  RD, Schnurr  DP. Discovery of a novel human picornavirus in a stool sample from a pedriatric patient presenting with fever of unknown origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:214450. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abed  Y, Boivin  G. New Saffold cardioviruses in 3 children, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:8346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Drexler  JF, de Souza Luna  LK, Stöcker  A, Silva Almeida  P, Medrado Ribeiro  TC, Petersen  N, Circulation of three lineages of a novel Saffold cardiovirus in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1398405. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu  CY, Greninger  AL, Kanada  K, Kwok  T, Fischer  KF, Runckel  C, Identification of cardioviruses related to Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus in human infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:141249. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blinkova  O, Kapoor  A, Victoria  J, Naeem  A, Shaukat  S, Sharif  S, Cardioviruses are genetically diverse and common enteric infections in South Asian children. J Virol. 2009;83:463141. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zoll  J, Erkens Hulshof  S, Lanke  K, Verduyn Lunel  F, Melchers  WJ, Schoondermark-van de Ven  E, Saffold virus, a human Theiler’s-like cardiovirus, is ubiquitous and causes infection early in life. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Itagaki  T, Abiko  C, Aoki  Y, Ikeda  T, Mizuta  K, Noda  M, Saffold cardiovirus infection in children associated with respiratory disease and its similarity to Coxsackievirus infection. Ped Infect Dis J. 2011 Mar 7; [Epub ahead of print].
  8. Chiu  CY, Greninger  AL, Chen  EC, Haggerty  TD, Personnet  J, Delwart  E, Cultivation and serological characterization of the human Theiler’s-like cardiovirus associated with diarrheal disease. J Virol. 2010;84:440714. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Viskari  H, Ludvigsson  J, Uibo  R, Salur  L, Marciulionyte  D, Hermann  R, Relationship between the incidence of type 1 diabetes and maternal enterovirus antibodies: time trends and geographical variation. Diabetologia. 2005;48:12807. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Benschop  K, Thomas  X, Serpenti  C, Molenkamp  R, Wolthers  K. High prevalence of human parechovirus (HPeV) genotypes in the Amsterdam region and identification of specific HPeV variants by direct genotyping of stool samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:396570. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1708.101953

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 8—August 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jochem Galama, Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 15, 2011
Page updated: August 15, 2011
Page reviewed: August 15, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.