Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 11—November 2012

Bartonella spp. Bacteremia and Rheumatic Symptoms in Patients from Lyme Disease–endemic Region

Cite This Article

To the Editor: We believe the recent article by Maggi et al. (1) contains serious flaws in content and underlying message, including a poorly defined study population, lack of appropriate controls, improper use of the term bacteremia, and incongruent laboratory findings. Selection criteria were vague: the authors state only that participants were a “biased” collection of “patients selected by a rheumatologist,” with no control population included for comparison. The diagnosis of Lyme disease and other previously diagnosed conditions was solely by self-report. Although blood samples were collected from every participant, the authors apparently neglected to perform standardized testing for Borrelia burgdorferi or other conditions.

The term “bacteremia” signifies presence of viable bacteria in the bloodstream, which is not substantiated solely by a positive PCR result. True bacteremia was documented in only 1.7% of participants from whom a viable Bartonella species isolate was cultured, rather than the purported 41.1% of participants.

Surprisingly, many participants whose PCR results were positive for Bartonella spp. had no serologic evidence of infection (e.g., 82.5% of samples that had positive PCR results for Bartonella henselae were not seroreactive). Although anergy has been reported, samples from most immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients infected with Bartonella spp. are seroreactive (24), calling into question the authors’ findings. Furthermore, 24% of samples that were positive by PCR revealed no identifiable Bartonella spp. by DNA sequencing; these participants should have been excluded from analysis.

Maggi et al. hypothesize that Bartonella spp. infection is causally related to a variety of chronic ailments. In fact, there was no association within the study population between positive Bartonella spp. PCR results and chronic illness, self-reported Lyme disease, or even a prior diagnosis of bartonellosis.

Efforts to define the clinical and public health importance of Bartonella spp. require scientific rigor. The above issues challenge the validity of the study, and results should be interpreted with caution.


C. Ben Beard, Christina A. Nelson, Paul S. Mead, and Lyle R. Petersen

Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA



  1. Maggi  RG, Mozayeni  BR, Pultorak  EL, Hegarty  BC, Bradley  JM, Correa  M, Bartonella spp. bacteremia and rheumatic symptoms in patients from Lyme disease–endemic region. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:78391. DOIPubMed
  2. Dalton  MJ, Robinson  LE, Cooper  J, Regnery  RL, Olson  JG, Childs  JE. Use of Bartonella antigens for serologic diagnosis of cat-scratch disease at a national referral center. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:16706. DOIPubMed
  3. Zangwill  KM, Hamilton  DH, Perkins  BA, Regnery  RL, Plikaytis  BD, Hadler  JL, Cat scratch disease in Connecticut. Epidemiology, risk factors, and evaluation of a new diagnostic test. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:813. DOIPubMed
  4. Koehler  JE, Sanchez  MA, Tye  S, Garrido-Rowland  CS, Chen  FM, Maurer  T, Prevalence of Bartonella infection among human immunodeficiency virus–infected patients with fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:55966. DOIPubMed


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1811.120675

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 11—November 2012


Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Christina A. Nelson, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3150 Rampart Rd, Mailstop P02, Fort Collins, CO 80525, USA

Didier Raoult, Faculte de Medecine, Aix Marseille Université, URMITE, UMR CNRS 7278, IRD 198 Centre National de Référence, 27 Blvd Jean Moulin, Marseille 13005, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: October 18, 2012
Page updated: October 18, 2012
Page reviewed: October 18, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.