Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 12—December 2014

Mycobacterium Species Related to M. leprae and M. lepromatosis from Cows with Bovine Nodular Thelitis

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Didier PinComments to Author , Véronique Guérin-Faublée, Virginie Garreau, Franck Breysse, Oana Dumitrescu, Jean-Pierre Flandrois, and Gerard Lina
Author affiliations: VetAgro Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l’Étoile, France (D. Pin, V. Guérin-Faublée); Clinique Vétérinaire, Saint Bénigne, France (V. Garreau); Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France (F. Breysse); Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France (O. Dumitrescu, J.-P. Flandrois, G. Lina)

Cite This Article


Bovine nodular thelitis is a granulomatous dermatitis associated with infection with acid-fast bacteria. To identify the mycobacterium responsible for this infection, we conducted phylogenetic investigations based on partial sequencing of 6 genes. These bacteria were identified as an undescribed Mycobacterium species that was phylogenetically related to M. leprae and M. lepromatosis.

The genus Mycobacterium contains >100 species. Except for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and M. leprae, which are parasitic bacteria, mycobacteria are considered saprophytic and found in soil, water, and sediments. Humans and wild and domestic animals can be infected by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from environmental sources, and several species are emerging as opportunistic pathogens in humans. NTM are often present on the skin surface after exposure to aqueous environments, and NTM skin diseases are of particular concern in humans (1).

Bovine nodular thelitis is a chronic and enzootic cutaneous disease that was first described in France in 1963 and then in Japan and Switzerland (2–­4). This granulomatous dermatitis is associated with acid-fast bacilli and believed to have a mycobacterial origin of infection (2,4). However, cultivation and characterization of the causal bacteria have not been successful (3). We used a multigene sequencing phylogenetic approach described previously (5) to identify the mycobacterium responsible for bovine nodular thelitis.

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Lesions of cows with bovine nodular thelitis, Jura, France. A) Nodule on a bovine teat (arrow). B) Nodular granulomatous dermatitis,  hematoxylin and eosin stained, original magnification ×100). C) Nodular granulomatous dermatitis, showing foamy macrophages (large arrow) and lymphocytes (small arrow) in an inflammatory infiltrate, original magnification ×400. D) Acid-fast bacteria. Ziehl-Neelsen stained, original magnification ×1,000.

Figure 1. Lesions of cows with bovine nodular thelitis, Jura, France. A) Nodule on a bovine teat (arrow). B) Nodular granulomatous dermatitis, hematoxylin and eosin stained, original magnification ×100). C) Nodular granulomatous...

In 2013, we visited a dairy herd in Jura, France, on 3 occasions. The herd contained ≈30 lactating cows. During physical examination of all teats, one third of the cows had lesions. In most cases, only 1 teat/cow had a lesion, which was a single, painless nodule of variable size that was localized in the dermis (Figure 1, panel A). Early-stage lesions, which had a well-demarcated indurated area, were observed only in a few cows. A few nodules evolved to ulcers, and most ulcers showed cicatrization and fibrosis.

To establish a diagnosis, we obtained 3 biopsy specimens from 3 cows (1 specimen/cow) under local anesthesia (lidocaine) from intact nodules by using a skin biopsy punch (diameter 8 mm). Each biopsy specimen was divided into 2 parts: half was placed in formalin, and half was placed in sterile 0.9% NaCl.

During histopathologic examination, superficial and deep dermis showed nodular and interstitial dermatitis (Figure 1, panel B) and an infiltrate composed predominantly of large, pale, foamy macrophages mixed with lymphocytes and few plasma cells (Figure 1, panel C). Some macrophages contained 2 or 3 nuclei and a granular cytoplasm. Multinucleated giant cells were rarely observed. There were large foci of necrosis. Ziehl-Neelsen staining indicated acid-fast bacteria deposited in clumps and resembling globi of leprosy within macrophages and necrotic foci exclusively on samples 1 and 2 (Figure 1, panel D). These observations resulted in the diagnosis of bovine nodular thelitis. Mycobacterial culture was not attempted because of its inherent difficulty (3). A molecular approach was used to characterize bacteria from the 3 biopsy specimens.

Biopsy specimens were washed 3 times with DNA-free sterile water, and epidermis was removed from the dermis and hypodermis to avoid contamination with cutaneous flora. The dermis and hypodermis were homogenized at 7,400 rpm for 70 s in a proteinase K solution (1 mg/mL) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) by using a MagNA Lyser (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), followed by incubation for 18 h at 55°C in a shaking dry bath incubator. Whole DNA was extracted from the lysed tissue by using the MagnaPure Compact Kit (Roche Molecular Diagnostics).

For the phylogenetic investigations, a multigene sequencing approach was used (5). Double-stranded partial sequences of the genes for 65-kDa heat shock protein (hsp65 [groEL2]), the β-subunit of RNA polymerase gene (rpoB), superoxide dismutase (sodA), elongation factor Tuf (tuf), 16S rRNA, and transfer–messenger (tmRNA) were obtained by real-time PCR by using primers (Table) designed for this study (rpoB) or described previously (5,6). For each gene, chromatograms corresponding to the 2 strands of the 3 amplified products (only 2 amplified products for the 16S rRNA gene) were compared by using Staden software ( and edited to remove ambiguous bases (7).

For each gene, no differences were detected among 3 sequences (2 sequences for the 16S rRNA gene), and a consensus sequence was subsequently used for each gene (392 bp for hsp65 [KJ095005], 951 bp for rpoB [KJ095009], 442 bp for sodA [KJ095006], 718 bp for tuf [KJ095008], 359 bp for the tmRNA gene [KJ095007], and 369 bp for the 16S rRNA gene [KJ095004]). To make phylogenetic comparisons, we selected a subset of Mycobacterium spp. sequences for each gene to obtain a good representation of the genomic diversity among the slow-growing mycobacteria by using data from Mignard and Flandrois (5). Sequences were obtained from GenBank/European Molecular Biology Laboratory/DNA Data Bank of Japan databases. The MAFFT program ( was used to align nucleotide sequences. Alignments were verified by using SeaView ( Divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks were removed by using Gblocks ( to ensure an accurate alignment before phylogenetic reconstructions. Phylogenies were inferred from sequences by calculating observed genetic distances by using PhyML ( with the general time reversible evolutionary model (7). Mycobacterium setuense was used as an outgroup because it is a species that is borderline to the slow-growing mycobacteria (8). Resulting tree topologies were evaluated by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 resamples.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of A) Phylogenetic trees based on partial A) β-subunit of RNA polymerase, B) partial heat shock protein 65 sequences, and C) partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of Mycobacterium spp., Jura, France. Phylogenies were inferred by using PhyML ( with the general time reversible evolutionary model (7). Trees were rooted by using M. setuense as an outgroup. Strains isolated in this study are indicated in bold. Values along the branches are bootstrap values (bootstr

Figure 2. A) Phylogenetic trees based on partial A) β-subunit of RNA polymerase, B) partial heat shock protein 65 sequences, and C) partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of Mycobacterium spp., Jura, France. Phylogenies...

The phylogenetic tree based on rpoB sequences (Figure 2, panel A) was consistent with that obtained for hsp65 sequences (Figure 2, panel B). On the basis of rpoB and hsp65 phylogenies, the unidentified organism was phylogenetically similar to M. leprae and M. lepromatosis but belonged to a clearly distinct branch. Similar to these species, it shares a common ancestor with M. haemophilum. The same well-sustained relationship with M. leprae and separation from M. haemophilum was inferred from sodA, tuf, and tmRNA gene phylogenies, but the lack of corresponding sequences for M. lepromatosis impaired this analysis.

On the basis of 16S rRNA gene phylogeny (Figure 2, panel C), the unknown organism was a member of the M. leprae cluster and was related to M. lepromatosis and an unknown feline Mycobacterium sp. that causes leprosy-like symptoms in cats (9). This organism was phylogenetically related to M. lepromatosis, and the 2 species constituted a separate branch from that of M. leprae (bootstrap value 88%). The absence of congruence between the phylogenetic trees inferred from the 16S rRNA gene and the hsp65 and rpoB genes could be related to a short consensus sequence (369 bp) in a position that is not optimal for mycobacteria discrimination.


Phylogenetic investigations strongly supported the conclusion that an undescribed species of the genus Mycobacterium that is related to M. leprae and M. lepromatosis, the causative agents of tuberculoid and lepromatous leprosy, and a diffuse form of lepromatous leprosy (10,11), respectively, was characterized in cows with bovine nodular thelitis. M. leprae and M. lepromatosis are not cultivable on artificial media. M. haemophilum, which is closely related to M. leprae and M. lepromatosis (11,12), is a slow-growing mycobacterium that requires hemin and a low temperature for growth (12). Attempts to cultivate mycobacteria from cows with bovine nodular thelitis were mostly unsuccessful and necessitated multiple samples (3).

M. leprae strains were found to be clonal (13,14). In accordance with reductive evolution of its genome (15), this species is an obligate parasite that infects humans and armadillos (13). In contrast, the environment could be a reservoir of M. haemophilum (12). The natural habitat of the causative agent of bovine nodular thelitis is unknown, and zoonotic transmission had never been observed in breeder cows.

The M. leprae cluster might have an animal origin. Genetic studies of multiple bovine and feline mycobacteria characterized from animals with nodular thelitis and leprosy-like syndromes, respectively, are currently in progress and should provide useful information.



We thank Jérôme Frasson and the farmers for assistance with fieldwork and Catherine Pichat for technical assistance.

This study was supported by Unité Mixte de Recherche 558–Laboratoire Biométrie et Biologie Évolutives, Dermatology and Dermatopathology Unit–VetAgro Sup and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 1111.

Dr Pin is an associate professor in the Dermatology and Dermatopathology Unit in VetAgro Sup of the University of Lyon, Marcy l’Étoile, France. His research interests focus on large animal dermatology and the skin barrier.



  1. Elston  D. Nontuberculous mycobacterial skin infections. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009;10:2815 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Thorel  M-F, Morand  M, Fontaine  J-J, Gourreau  J-M. Bovine nodular thelitis: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases. Vet Dermatol. 1990;1:16570. DOIGoogle Scholar
  3. Yachida  S, Shimizu  K, Hirose  T, Sato  M. Studies on mycobacteria isolated from skin lesion tuberculosis of the bovine udder. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1973;35:357–65.
  4. Rüsch  P, Corboz  L, Ossent  P, Berchtold  M, Ehrensperger  F. Enzootic nodular-ulcerative mamillitis in dairy cows caused by unclassified mycobacteria [in German]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 1984;126:46778 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mignard  S, Flandrois  J-P. A seven-gene, multilocus, genus-wide approach to the phylogeny of mycobacteria using supertrees. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:143241. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Relman  DA. Universal bacterial 16S rDNA amplification and sequencing. In: Persing DH, Smith TF, Tenover FC, White TJ, editors. Diagnostic molecular microbiology: principles and applications. Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology; 1993. p. 489–95.
  7. Guérin-Faublée  V, Flandrois  J-P, Pichat  C, Boschiroli  ML, Lamy  B. Mycobacterium bourgelatii sp. nov., a rapidly growing, non-chromogenic species isolated from the lymph nodes of cattle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:466974. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tortoli  E. Phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: many doubts, few certainties. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:82731 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Malik  R, Hughes  MS, James  G, Martin  P, Wigney  DI, Canfield  PJ, Feline leprosy: two different clinical syndromes. J Feline Med Surg. 2002;4:4359. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Han  XY, Sizer  KC, Thompson  EJ, Kabanja  J, Li  J, Hu  P, Comparative sequence analysis of Mycobacterium leprae and the new leprosy-causing Mycobacterium lepromatosis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:606774. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Han  XY, Seo  Y-H, Sizer  KC, Schoberle  T, May  GS, Spencer  JS, A new Mycobacterium species causing diffuse lepromatous leprosy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130:85664. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindeboom  JA, Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet  LES, van Soolingen  D, Prins  JM, Kuijper  EJ. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of Mycobacterium haemophilum infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:70117. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Monot  M, Honoré  N, Garnier  T, Araoz  R, Coppée  J-Y, Lacroix  C, On the origin of leprosy. Science. 2005;308:10402. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schuenemann  VJ, Singh  P, Mendum  TA, Krause-Kyora  B, Jäger  G, Bos  KI, Genome-wide comparison of medieval and modern Mycobacterium leprae. Science. 2013;341:17983. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole  ST, Eiglmeier  K, Parkhill  J, James  KD, Thomson  NR, Wheeler  PR, Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature. 2001;409:100711. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2012.140184

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 12—December 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Pin, VetAgro Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Unité de Recherche Interactions Cellule Environnement, 69280 Marcy l’Étoile, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 19, 2014
Page updated: November 19, 2014
Page reviewed: November 19, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.