Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 9—September 2015

Filovirus RNA in Fruit Bats, China

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Filovirus-associated diseases, particularly those caused by Ebola and Marburg viruses, represent major threats to human health worldwide because they have extremely high death rates and antiviral therapies or vaccines against them are not available (1). Members of the family Filoviridae are classified into 3 genera: Marburgvirus, Ebolavirus, and the recently approved Cuevavirus (2,3). Marburg virus (MARV) and Ebola virus (EBOV) were initially isolated in Africa, but other filoviruses have been identified on other continents. The initial Cuevavirus, Lloviu virus (LLOV), was identified in Europe (Spain) (3), and Ebola-Reston virus has been found in pigs in Asia (the Philippines) (4).

Bats are natural reservoirs for filoviruses (5). Viral isolation and serologic studies indicate that filovirus infections have occurred in various bat species in central Africa countries (6), the Philippines (7), China (8), and Bangladesh (9). However, identification of these viruses in bats has been difficult; although isolates of MARV have been obtained (6) and the genome of LLOV has been fully sequenced (3), very short sequences of EBOV have been obtained from bats, and only in Africa (5). Reports of molecular detection or isolation of filoviruses in bats in Asia are lacking. We conducted a study to investigate the presence of filoviruses in bats in China.

In June 2013, twenty-nine apparently healthy Rousettus leschenaultia fruit bats were captured in Yunnan Province, China. All bats were humanely killed, and their intestines, lungs, livers, and brains were collected and subjected to viral metagenomic analysis by a previously described method (10). As a result, we obtained and reassembled de novo 10 million reads into 590,010 contigs. Of these contigs, 3 (129–354 nt) were genetically close to filovirus, corresponding to the nucleoprotein gene of LLOV (74% nt identity), the viral protein 35 gene of Sudan Ebola virus (69% nt identity), and the L gene of Tai Forest Ebola virus (72% nt identity) (Technical Appendix Table 1).

For further screening, we used the longest contig as a template for design of specific seminested primers. Nested degenerate primer pairs were also designed and focused on the most conserved region of the L gene of all currently known filoviruses (Technical Appendix Table 2). After screening, 2 reverse transcription PCRs of tissues from 1 bat (Bt-DH04) showed positive amplification in specimens from its lung but not from intestine, liver, or brain tissue. Moreover, 5 blind passages in Vero-E6 cells failed to isolate the virus from the lung homogenate. In an attempt to obtain its genomic sequence, 24 primer pairs covering the full genome were further designed by alignment of these contig sequences with the full genomes of representative filoviruses within the 3 genera. All amplifications used ddH2O as a negative control; positive controls were not available because filoviruses were not available in China. Two fragments of 2,750-nt (F1) and 2,682-nt (F2) were successfully amplified from lung tissue of Bt-DH04; attempts to amplify the remaining regions failed. Alignment with sequences of 26 representative filoviruses of 7 species from 3 genera revealed that F1 covered the 3′ end of the nucleoprotein gene and almost the entire viral protein 35 gene, and that F2 covered the middle region of the L gene, corresponding to nt 1,313–4,085 and nt 12,613–15,302 of the full genome of EBOV (GenBank accession no. HQ613402). The 2 fragment sequences were submitted to Genbank (accession no. KP233864), and the strain has been tentatively named Bt-DH04.


Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of 2 fragments of filovirus Bt-DH04 and other filoviruses. Full genomes of representatives from the family Filoviridae were trimmed and aligned with F1 (partial nucleoprotein/viral protein 35 gene, panel A) and F2 (middle L gene, panel B) of filovirus strain Bt-DH04 by using ClustalW version 2.0 (, then phylogenetically analyzed by using MEGA6 ( by the maximum-likelihood method, resulting in a bootstrap testing

Figure. Phylogenetic analysis of 2 fragments of filovirus Bt-DH04 and other filoviruses. Full genomes of representatives from the family Filoviridae were trimmed and aligned with F1 (partial nucleoprotein/viral protein 35 gene, panel...

Phylogenetic analysis showed that the Bt-DH04 strain is placed, together with LLOV, at basal position and intermediate between EBOV and MARV (Figure). It is divergent from all known filoviruses, with F1 sharing the highest nucleotide identities (46%–49%) to members of the genus Ebolavirus, followed by 44% to LLOV and <40% to MARV (Figure, panel A). The L gene is the most conserved region of filoviruses, and F2 of Bt-DH04 strain shared relatively closer 66%–68% nt identities with members of the genus Ebolavirus, followed by 64% with LLOV and ≈60% with MARV (Figure, panel B). This sequence diversity is likely the main factor for unsuccessful amplification of the full genome of Bt-DH04.

Increasing PCR evidence has identified the existence of filoviruses in bats in Africa and Europe (3,5); however, although serologic studies have shown that filovirus antibodies are prevalent in bats in a few countries in Asia (e.g., the Philippines, Bangladesh and China [79]), filovirus or filovirus RNA have not been reported in bats in Asia. Our results show that the Bt-DH04 strain is likely a novel bat-borne filovirus in Asia and provide evidence that bats in Asia harbor more divergent filoviruses than previously thought.

Fruit bats in the genus Rousettus are widely distributed throughout Southeast Asia, South China, and the entire Indian subcontinent and have had positive serologic results for Ebola viruses in these regions (79), indicating that these bats play a role in the circulation of filoviruses in Asia. The possibility of new emerging filovirus-associated diseases in the continent emphasizes the need for further investigation of these animals.



The study was supported by NSFC-Yunnan Province Joint Fund (U1036601), National “973” Program (grant no. 2012CB722501) and National “863” Program (grant no. 2012AA022006) to C. T. Sampling of bats was approved by the Administrative Committee on Animal Welfare of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, China (Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee Authorization, permit number: JSY-DW-2010-02).


Biao He1, Yun Feng1, Hailin Zhang1, Lin Xu, Weihong Yang, Yuzhen Zhang, Xingyu Li, and Changchun TuComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Jilin, China (B. He, L. Xu, X. Li, C. Tu); Yunnan Institute of Endemic Diseases Control and Prevention, Dali, China (Y. Feng, H. Zhang, W. Yang, Y. Zhang); Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China (C. Tu)



  1. Sanchez  A, Geisbert  TW, Feldmann  H. Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business; 2007. p. 1409–48.
  2. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. ICTV virus taxonomy 2013 [cited 2015 Apr 28].
  3. Negredo  A, Palacios  G, Vazquez-Moron  S, Gonzalez  F, Dopazo  H, Molero  F, Discovery of an Ebolavirus-like filovirus in Europe. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002304. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrette  RW, Metwally  SA, Rowland  JM, Xu  L, Zaki  SR, Nichol  ST, Discovery of swine as a host for the Reston ebolavirus. Science. 2009;325:2046. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Olival  KJ, Hayman  DTS. Filoviruses in bats: current knowledge and future directions. Viruses. 2014;6:175988. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Towner  JS, Amman  BR, Sealy  TK, Carroll  SA, Comer  JA, Kemp  A, Isolation of genetically diverse Marburg viruses from Egyptian fruit bats. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000536. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Taniguchi  S, Watanabe  S, Masangkay  JS, Omatsu  T, Ikegami  T, Alviola  P, Reston ebolavirus antibodies in bats, the Philippines. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:155960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yuan  J, Zhang  Y, Li  J, Zhang  Y, Wang  LF, Shi  Z. Serological evidence of Ebolavirus infection in bats, China. Virol J. 2012;9:236. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Olival  KJ, Islam  A, Yu  M, Anthony  SJ, Epstein  JH, Khan  SA, Ebola virus antibodies in fruit bats, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:2703. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. He  B, Li  Z, Yang  F, Zheng  J, Feng  Y, Guo  H, Virome profiling of bats from Myanmar by metagenomic analysis of tissue samples reveals more novel mammalian viruses. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61950. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2109.150260

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 9—September 2015

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Changchun Tu, Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Military Veterinary Institute, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 666 Liuying West Rd, Jingyue Economic Development Zone, Changchun, 130122, People’s Republic of China

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 14, 2015
Page updated: August 14, 2015
Page reviewed: August 14, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.