Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 12—December 2016
Dispatch

Highly Divergent Dengue Virus Type 2 in Traveler Returning from Borneo to Australia

Wenjun Liu, Paul Pickering, Sebastián Duchêne, Edward C. Holmes, and John G. AaskovComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (W. Liu, P. Pickering J.G. Aaskov); University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S. Duchene, E.C. Holmes); Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane (J.G. Aaskov)

Main Article

Figure 1

A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 500 complete genome sequences of DENV-1–DENV-4 (alignment length of 10,185 nt), including QML22/2015, estimated by using the generalized time-reversible invariable sites gamma model of nucleotide substitution in PhyML (13) and nearest-neighbor interchange plus subtree pruning, regrafting, and branch swapping. The tree is midpoint rooted for clarity, and sequences are color coded according to their putative transmission cycle (human, black; sylvatic, blu

Figure 1. A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 500 complete genome sequences of DENV-1–DENV-4 (alignment length of 10,185 nt), including QML22/2015, estimated by using the generalized time-reversible invariable sites gamma model of nucleotide substitution in PhyML (13) and nearest-neighbor interchange plus subtree pruning, and regrafting branch-swapping. The tree is midpoint rooted for clarity, and sequences are color coded according to their putative transmission cycle (human, black; sylvatic, blue); red indicates the highly divergent QML22/2015 lineage isolated in this study. B) Regression of root-to-tip genetic distances of 119 representative human and sylvatic complete genome sequences of DENV-2 (alignment length 10,173 nt) against time (year) of sampling. The input phylogenetic tree was estimated by using the same maximum-likelihood procedure. Three regression lines and slopes are shown; slopes indicate an estimate of the virus nucleotide substitution rate (substitutions/site/year). Blue line indicates rate for entire DENV-2 data set; dashed line indicates rate for sylvatic DENV-2 sequences; black line indicates rate for human DENV-2 sequences. There is a marked difference between sylvatic and human rates. DENV, dengue virus.

Main Article

References
  1. Rudnick  A, Marchette  NJ, Garcia  R. Possible jungle dengue—recent studies and hypotheses. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1967;20(Suppl):6974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kimura  R, Hotta  S. On the inoculation of dengue virus into mice. Nippon Igaku. 1944;3379:62933.
  3. Sabin  AB. Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1952;1:3050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hammon  WM, Rudnick  A, Sather  GE. Viruses associated with epidemic hemorrhagic fevers of the Philippines and Thailand. Science. 1960;131:11023.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang  E, Ni  H, Xu  R, Barrett  AD, Watowich  SJ, Gubler  DJ, et al. Evolutionary relationships of endemic/epidemic and sylvatic dengue viruses. J Virol. 2000;74:322734.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vasilakis  N, Cardosa  J, Hanley  KA, Holmes  EC, Weaver  SC. Fever from the forest: prospects for the continued emergence of sylvatic dengue virus and its impact on public health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:53241.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pyke  AT, Moore  PR, Taylor  CT, Hall-Mendelin  S, Cameron  JN, Hewitson  GR, et al. Highly divergent dengue virus type 1 genotype sets a new distance record. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22356.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Roehrig  JT, Mathews  JH, Trent  DW. Identification of epitopes on the E glycoprotein of Saint Louis encephalitis virus using monoclonal antibodies. Virology. 1983;128:11826.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Henchal  EA, Gentry  MK, McCown  JM, Brandt  WE. Dengue virus-specific and flavivirus group determinants identified with monoclonal antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1982;31:8306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jianmin  Z, Linn  ML, Bulich  R, Gentry  MK, Aaskov  JG. Analysis of functional epitopes on the dengue 2 envelope (E) protein using monoclonal IgM antibodies. Arch Virol. 1995;140:899913.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sambrook  J, Rusell  DW, editors. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Press; 2001.
  12. Biebricher  CK, Luce  R. Sequence analysis of RNA species synthesized by Q beta replicase without template. Biochemistry. 1993;32:484854.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guindon  S, Dufayard  JF, Lefort  V, Anisimova  M, Hordijk  W, Gascuel  O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:30721.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Popescu  AA, Huber  KT, Paradis  E. ape 3.0: New tools for distance-based phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:15367.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vasilakis  N, Cardosa  J, Diallo  M, Sall  AA, Holmes  EC, Hanley  KA, et al. Sylvatic dengue viruses share the pathogenic potential of urban/endemic dengue viruses. J Virol. 2010;84:37267, author reply 3727–8.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

Page created: November 18, 2016
Page updated: November 18, 2016
Page reviewed: November 18, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external