Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 4—April 2016

Shiga Toxin 1–Producing Shigella sonnei Infections, California, United States, 2014–2015

Katherine LambaComments to Author , Jennifer A. Nelson, Akiko C. Kimura, Alyssa Poe, Joan Collins, Annie S. Kao, Laura Cruz, Gregory Inami, Julie Vaishampayan, Alvaro Garza, Vishnu Chaturvedi, and Duc Vugia
Author affiliations: California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA (K. Lamba, A.C. Kimura, A. Poe, L. Cruz, G. Inami, V. Chaturvedi, D.J. Vugia); County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, San Diego, California, USA (J.A. Nelson, A.S. Kao); San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Stockton, California, USA (J. Collins, J. Vaishampayan, A. Garza)

Cite This Article


CME Logo

Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit.

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint providership of Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at; (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: March 16, 2016; Expiration date: March 16, 2017

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

•     Distinguish the epidemiologic features of recent emergence of Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei in the United States, based on a surveillance study

•     Identify clinical characteristics of recent Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei infections in the United States

•     Determine antibiotic resistance, treatment, and outcomes of recent Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei infections in the United States

CME Editor

Jean Michaels Jones, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Jean Michaels Jones has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: owns stock, stock options, or bonds from Pfizer.


Disclosures: Katherine Lamba, MPH; Jennifer A. Nelson, MPH; Akiko C. Kimura, MD; Alyssa Poe; Joan Collins, BSN, PHN; Annie S. Kao, PhD, MS, MPH; Laura Cruz; Gregory Inami; Julie Vaishampayan, MD, MPH; Alvaro Garza, MD, MPH; Vishnu Chaturvedi, PhD; and Duc J. Vugia, MD, MPH, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.



Shiga toxins (Stx) are primarily associated with Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli and Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1. Stx production by other shigellae is uncommon, but in 2014, Stx1-producing S. sonnei infections were detected in California. Surveillance was enhanced to test S. sonnei isolates for the presence and expression of stx genes, perform DNA subtyping, describe clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of case-patients, and investigate for sources of infection. During June 2014–April 2015, we identified 56 cases of Stx1-producing S. sonnei, in 2 clusters. All isolates encoded stx1 and produced active Stx1. Multiple pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were identified. Bloody diarrhea was reported by 71% of case-patients; none had hemolytic uremic syndrome. Some initial cases were epidemiologically linked to travel to Mexico, but subsequent infections were transmitted domestically. Continued surveillance of Stx1-producing S. sonnei in California is necessary to characterize its features and plan for reduction of its spread in the United States.

Shiga toxins (Stxs) are cytotoxins that mediate severe gastrointestinal disease caused by Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1 (1). S. dysenteriae 1 produces the prototype Shiga toxin (Stx), and STEC can produce 2 groups of Stxs: Stx1 and Stx2. Vascular damage caused by Stxs in the colon, kidneys, and central nervous system may result in hemorrhagic colitis, or more severe conditions such as hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) (2). Stx2 has been shown to be more virulent than Stx1 (3), and adverse clinical outcomes such as HUS are more frequently associated with Stx2-producing strains of STEC than Stx1-producing strains (4). Antimicrobial drug treatment for STEC infections and late or inappropriate antimicrobial drug treatment for S. dysenteriae 1 infections have been associated with an increased risk for HUS (5,6).

Although Shiga toxins have been associated with STEC and S. dysenteriae 1, infections caused by other types of Stx-producing Shigella spp. have been recognized in recent years. Sporadic infections with Stx1-producing S. dysenteriae serotype 4 and S. flexneri in persons with a history of travel to the Caribbean island of Hispañiola have been characterized in the United States and Canada (79). A recent survey of Shigella isolates from persons with a history of travel to the Caribbean found that 21% of isolates encoded and produced Stx; positive strains were S. flexneri 2a, S. flexneri Y, and S. dysenteriae 4 (10). The same Stx-converting bacteriophage was identified among these isolates, suggesting the emergence of Stx-producing shigellae in this region was caused by spread of the phage to multiple Shigella species and serotypes. One case of infection with Stx1-producing S. sonnei in a patient from Germany who had a history of travel to Ukraine (11) and one instance of isolation of stx2a-encoding S. sonnei from a patient from Finland who had a history of travel to Morocco have been described (12). Although these novel strains of Stx-producing shigellae have been reported recently, data regarding the clinical characteristics and epidemiology of these infections remain limited.

In the United States, infections with Stx-producing organisms are primarily caused by STEC; S. dysenteriae 1 infections are rare. Of laboratory-confirmed cases of shigellosis reported in the United States, ≈75% are caused by S. sonnei (13). S. sonnei infections are typically less severe than infections with S. dysenteriae 1 and are characterized by diarrhea, which may be bloody and accompanied by fever, nausea, and abdominal cramps. Illnesses are usually self-limited and resolve within 5–7 days of onset. Extraintestinal complications such as bacteremia and urogenital infections are rare but have been documented (1417). Although antimicrobial drug treatment is generally unnecessary for patients with uncomplicated S. sonnei infections, antimicrobial drugs are often used to limit the duration of illness and communicability and to reduce illness severity (18).

In August 2014, Stx1-positive fecal samples from 2 patients tested by using enzyme immunoassay were reported to the County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency (COSD HHSA; San Diego, CA, USA); the same clinical specimens showed positive S. sonnei culture results. COSD HHSA initiated an investigation and notified the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Surveillance was enhanced retrospectively and prospectively in California to confirm Stx-producing S. sonnei isolates, identify additional cases, describe the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of infected persons, monitor for severe clinical outcomes such as HUS, and to investigate for potential sources of infection. We subsequently identified 2 clusters of Stx-producing S. sonnei; the second cluster continued into late 2015. We report our findings on the initial 56 confirmed cases of Stx1-producing S. sonnei identified during June 2014–April 2015.


Case Finding

We defined a suspected case as detection of S. sonnei and Stx or stx genes in a clinical specimen collected during June 2014–April 2015 from a resident of California. We implemented several methods to identify suspected cases for laboratory confirmation and epidemiologic investigation. CDPH notified California local health departments of unusual detections and requested that suspected cases be reported. In addition, regular reviews of shigellosis and STEC electronic surveillance data were conducted to identify suspected cases. Some local health departments communicated with healthcare providers in their administrative areas to request reporting of suspected cases. After the detection of a cluster of suspected cases in San Joaquin County in February 2015, San Joaquin County Public Health Services prospectively enhanced laboratory surveillance and requested that local laboratories submit all Shigella isolates for Stx testing. Stx-positive broths and S. sonnei isolates for all suspected cases were forwarded to the CDPH Microbial Diseases Laboratory to confirm the presence and expression of stx genes in S. sonnei.

Laboratory Testing

All isolates from patients with suspected cases were identified by using a commercial rapid identification system (VITEK 2 Compact, bioMérieux, Bio Marcy l’Etoile, France) or Shigella antisera. Isolates were further characterized by using a multiplex real-time PCR for stx1 and stx2 genes according to a scheme for STEC testing described by Probert et al (19). The Vero cell neutralization assay was used to detect active Stx. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed by using PulseNet protocols (20).

Case Definitions

We defined a confirmed case as isolation of S. sonnei positive for stx genes and active Stx production from a clinical specimen collected during June 2014–April 2015 from a resident of California. A secondary case was defined as a confirmed case in a person with illness onset >12 hours but within 2 weeks after household or other close contact with a person with a diarrheal illness. Cases in persons for whom data were available regarding ill contacts that did not meet the secondary case criteria were considered primary cases. Cases of undiagnosed diarrheal illness in contacts of suspected or confirmed case-patients were excluded from the investigation.

Data Collection

After receiving a report of Stx-positive feces/STEC/HUS or a diagnosis of shigellosis in a patient from a healthcare provider or laboratory, California local health department personnel routinely interview patients by using a standardized shigellosis or STEC/HUS case report form. We re-interviewed patients who had a suspected case of Stx-producing S. sonnei with a standardized investigation questionnaire that collected information on demographics, symptoms, treatment, clinical outcomes, risk factors for shigellosis, and exposure history. Suspected case-patients were queried regarding exposures during the 7 days before symptom onset. We extracted data from the local health department standardized shigellosis or STEC case report form if case-patients were not reached for re-interview with the investigation questionnaire and retrieved clinical data from medical records for case-patients lost to follow-up.

Data Analysis

Illness onset date was unavailable for 1 case-patient and was estimated as the date 3 days before specimen collection. For case-patients symptomatic at the time of the last interview, we calculated duration of symptoms by subtracting illness onset date from interview date. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics; we used the χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test, and Student t-test to compare characteristics of case-patients in clusters 1 and 2 and by age category (<5 vs. >5 years of age). We used the binomial test to compare the number of Hispanic case-patients in each cluster to population proportions based on 2014 American Community Survey data (21). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. We used SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for analyses.


Figure 1

Thumbnail of Epidemic curve of Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei cases in California (N = 56), by week of illness onset, cluster, and epidemiologic link to Mexico, June 2014–April 2015. Cluster 1, southern California, June–December 2014 (n = 25); cluster 2, San Joaquin County, northern California, January–April 2015 (n = 31). Illness onset week designated using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report weeks.

Figure 1. Epidemic curve of Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei cases in California (N = 56), by week of illness onset, cluster, and epidemiologic link to Mexico, June 2014–April 2015. Cluster 1, southern...

During June 2014–April 2015, we identified a total of 56 cases of Stx1-producing S. sonnei in 2 epidemiologically distinct clusters in California. Cluster 1 consisted of 25 cases in persons epidemiologically linked to southern California with illness onset dates during June 26–December 18, 2014 (Figure 1). Cluster 2 consisted of 31 cases in residents of San Joaquin County in northern California with illness onset dates during January 28–April 28, 2015. The median age of all case-patients was 19.5 years (range 1–71 years); 54% were male. Eleven (20%) case-patients were children <5 years of age.

Laboratory Testing

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Dendrogram and selected pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of XbaI-digested Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei isolates from California. Predominant XbaI patterns identified in cluster 1 are shown in rows A and B and outlier on row F. Predominant patterns identified in cluster 2 are shown in rows C and E and outlier on row D. ID no., identification number.

Figure 2. Dendrogram and selected pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of XbaI-digested Shiga toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei isolates from California. Predominant XbaI patterns identified in cluster 1 are shown in rows A and...

The 56 isolates tested were confirmed to be S. sonnei by the rapid identification system or by agglutination in group D antiserum. All isolates tested by the multiplex PCR were positive for the stx1 and negative for the stx2 gene and showed active Stx production by neutralization with Stx1 antiserum in the Vero cell assay. We constructed a dendrogram of predominant and selected PFGE patterns after XbaI digestion (Figure 2).

Clinical Summary

Overall clinical characteristics of the 56 cases (Table 1) did not differ significantly by cluster (data not shown). Case-patients were interviewed by using the investigation questionnaire a median of 67 and 11.5 days, respectively, after illness onset in clusters 1 and 2. Symptoms most commonly reported were diarrhea (100%), abdominal cramps (87%), fever (72%), and bloody diarrhea (71%). Twelve (21%) case-patients were hospitalized and 27 (53%) of 51 sought medical care at an emergency department. Case-patients <5 years of age were more likely to have fever (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.054) and bloody diarrhea (80% vs. 68%; not statistically significant) than were case-patients >5 years of age. The median duration of symptoms was 5 days (interquartile range 3–7 days), and median length of hospitalization was 3 days (interquartile range 1.5–4 days). Six case-patients in cluster 2 were symptomatic at the time of interview; illness duration ranged from 5–12 days. No cases of HUS were identified, and no patients died.

S. sonnei was isolated from fecal specimens from 54 case-patients, from a blood specimen from 1 case-patient, and from a urine specimen from 1 case-patient. The case-patient who had bacteremia was a woman, 57 years of age, who had a history of substantial underlying medical conditions, including cirrhosis of the liver secondary to hepatitis C; she was hospitalized for hepatic encephalopathy. Her symptoms included abdominal pain and diarrhea, and computed tomography scan results of the abdomen indicated colitis and mesenteric lymphadenopathy; however, fecal culture was negative for Shigella and E. coli O157. The patient was treated with levofloxacin for her infection and discharged after 6 days. The case-patient from whom S. sonnei was isolated from a urine specimen was a 50-year-old woman with a diarrheal illness and clinical urinary tract infection (dysuria, pyuria >10 leukocytes/high power field). Urine culture for this patient also yielded E. coli and Enterococcus faecalis. S. sonnei was not isolated from her fecal sample.

Among the 29 isolates for which antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing results were available from clinical laboratories, we documented several antibiogram profiles. The most commonly identified profile (n = 16, 55%) showed resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and ampicillin. Four (14%) isolates were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin but susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Of 10 isolates from case-patients in cluster 2, six (60%) were resistant to ampicillin; none were resistant in cluster 1.

Of 53 case-patients with data available, 43 (81%) were treated with antimicrobial drugs. Most (n = 33, 77%) case-patients treated with antimicrobial drugs were treated with 1 drug, most frequently with ciprofloxacin (13/32, 41%). Among the case-patients treated with >1 antimicrobial drug, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole was the most common combination (6/10, 60%). A 4-year-old case-patient was treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, to which the isolate was resistant. This patient’s treatment was started 5 days after diarrhea onset, and no severe outcomes were observed. The median number of days from diarrhea onset to start of antimicrobial treatment was 3 days (interquartile range 1–5 days), and 23 (66%) of 35 case-patients began antimicrobial treatment within 4 days of diarrhea onset. No differences were identified between case-patients <5 versus >5 years of age with respect to timing of antimicrobial drug treatment initiation or proportion treated with antimicrobial drugs.

Epidemiologic Summary
Cluster 1

In this cluster, 24 of the 25 case-patients were residents of San Diego (n = 20), Orange (n = 2), and Riverside (n = 2) counties in southern California. One case-patient from San Joaquin County had illness onset in June 2014 after household contact with a visitor from southern California who had an undiagnosed diarrheal illness. We included this case-patient in cluster 1 on the basis of the illness onset date, contact with the ill southern California visitor, and positive test results for an isolate with the PFGE XbaI pattern predominant in cluster 1.

The median age of case-patients in this cluster was 10 years (range 2–64 years; Table 2). Case-patients were more likely to be Hispanic than the general population in those 4 counties (60.0% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.0085). Nine were considered primary case-patients and 16 were categorized as secondary; of the secondary case-patients, 7 had been exposed to another confirmed case-patient, and 9 to a contact with an undiagnosed diarrheal illness (Table 2). We identified 4 clusters of household transmission involving >2 confirmed cases, and a range of 2–5 cases of diarrheal illness in each household.

Five of 9 primary case-patients reported travel to Mexico during their exposure period, and 9 of 16 secondary case-patients were exposed to someone with a diarrheal illness who lived in or visited Mexico (Table 2). Overall, 14 (56%) cases were epidemiologically linked to Mexico, primarily Baja California. None of the case-patients whose illness onset dates were after mid-October 2014 (n = 8) reported epidemiologic links to Mexico. Of the 5 primary case-patients with a travel history to Mexico, none were there for all of the 7 days before illness onset. No common point sources of transmission were identified in Mexico or California.

The predominant PFGE XbaI pattern for isolates from patients in this cluster was J16X01.3287, identified in 12 (48%) isolates, including the San Joaquin County case-patient isolate. J16X01.1810 was the second most common pattern, identified in 4 (16%) isolates; 8 additional PFGE XbaI patterns were identified. We observed no association between PFGE patterns and epidemiologic links to Mexico.

Cluster 2

The 31 case-patients in this cluster were residents of San Joaquin County. Their median age was 33 years (range 1–71 years; Table 2), which was substantially older than that for cluster 1 (p = 0.0035). Eighteen cases were categorized as primary and 10 as secondary; 8 were secondary to another confirmed case. A smaller proportion of case-patients in cluster 2 were categorized as secondary than in cluster 1 (35.7% vs. 64.0%; p = 0.0398).

We identified 4 clusters of household transmission involving >2 confirmed cases in this cluster; a range of 2–4 cases of diarrheal illness were reported in each household. None of the case-patients reported a history of travel outside of California or close contact with anyone who lived in or visited Mexico. Case-patients in cluster 2 were significantly less likely to have an epidemiologic link to Mexico than those in cluster 1 (0% vs. 56.0%; p<0.0001). Four case-patients were homeless and 7 reported illicit drug use.

We identified no common point sources of transmission for this cluster. Aside from the identification of 1 case-patient in San Joaquin County in cluster 1, which occurred 7 months before cluster 2, no epidemiologic connection to cluster 1 was established. PFGE XbaI pattern J16X01.1456 was identified in 22 (71%) cluster 2 isolates, but no common source was identified among these cases. One PFGE XbaI pattern, J16X01.3318, was common to both clusters, identified in 2 cases from cluster 1 and 7 (23%) cases from cluster 2; however, no epidemiologic connection was found among the case-patients. Two additional PFGE XbaI patterns were identified in cluster 2 isolates.


We documented 56 cases of Stx-producing S. sonnei in the United States in 2 clusters, beginning in June 2014. All 56 S. sonnei isolates were confirmed to encode stx1 and produce active Stx1. The clinical presentation of case-patients appeared typical for illness caused by S. sonnei, but more patients reported bloody diarrhea than expected. Although several initial cases detected in southern California had epidemiologic links to Mexico, most cases appeared to result from sustained domestic transmission, suggesting this pathogen may become more prevalent in California and in the United States.

Overall, the patients’ diarrheal illnesses appeared typical for shigellosis caused by S. sonnei, and no cases of HUS were identified. The proportion of patients reporting bloody diarrhea, 71%, was higher than expected, but it is unclear whether the presence of Stx1 increased the risk for bloody diarrhea in these case-patients. A study of children with shigellosis in Bangladesh reported that those infected with S. dysenteriae type 1 had more grossly bloody feces than did those infected with other Shigella species (78% vs. 33%), likely caused by Stx (22). In our study, the case-patient with bacteremia had several underlying medical conditions including liver cirrhosis, a condition previously associated with shigellemia (23). Further studies are needed regarding the effects of Stx1 production in the pathogenesis and virulence of S. sonnei and the risk factors associated with developing adverse outcomes atypical for S. sonnei infections.

In our investigation, most case-patients received antimicrobial drug treatment, and no adverse outcomes or cases of HUS were observed. Antimicrobial drug therapy is widely used for treatment of patients with shigellosis, and early and effective treatment in patients infected with S. dysenteriae 1 has been shown to decrease the risk for HUS (24). However, delayed treatment or treatment with antimicrobial drugs to which the S. dysenteriae 1 isolate is resistant may be associated with an increased risk for HUS (3). The mechanisms by which antimicrobial treatment may precipitate S. dysenteriae 1–associated HUS are not well understood. Antimicrobial drug treatment for STEC infections is hypothesized to promote Stx production, and consequently increase the risk of developing HUS, so it is generally not recommended (6,25). The effects of antimicrobial drug treatment on pathogenesis or Stx production of Stx1-producing S. sonnei infections remain unclear. We identified multiple resistance patterns among the isolates in this study, suggesting that etiologic strains are heterogeneous. Considering the increasing prevalence of drug-resistant Shigella in the United States (26), clinicians should be aware of resistance patterns and monitor for potential adverse outcomes if deciding to treat Stx1-producing S. sonnei infections with antimicrobial drugs.

Our clinical data are subject to limitations. We excluded undiagnosed cases of diarrheal illness in contacts of confirmed case-patients from our investigation. Some of these persons might have had clinically mild infections with Stx1-producing S. sonnei. However, the possibility of missing adverse clinical outcomes in some patients is small, and because HUS is a reportable condition in California, unrecognized cases of HUS are unlikely. The lag between illness onset and case-patient re-interview in cluster 1 was unlikely to bias results because most pertinent data were collected during the initial standard shigellosis or STEC case investigation. The lag in the second interviews confirmed no adverse outcomes in case-patients.

Our investigation of 2 epidemiologically distinct clusters of Stx-producing S. sonnei infections suggests that emerging strains of S. sonnei may have initially been introduced into southern California by travelers returning from Mexico but are now circulating domestically. Stx1-producing S. sonnei strains have not been reported in Mexico, but our investigation suggests that they may be circulating in the Baja California region.

No clear connections between the clusters in southern and northern California were established. The introductory sources for cluster 2 remain unknown, but possibilities include unrecognized spread from southern California, new unrecognized introductions by travelers returning from abroad, or conversion of a naive strain of S. sonnei by an Stx1-converting bacteriophage and subsequent spread. The lack of an epidemiologic link to international travel among cases in cluster 2 and the substantial number of secondary cases caused by person-to-person transmission in both clusters demonstrate the potential for continued domestic transmission and spread in the United States.

The number of cases reported in this study is likely an underestimate of the true number of infections caused by Stx1-producing S. sonnei in California. Additional cases have likely gone unrecognized because persons with mild infections did not seek medical care or because laboratories and healthcare providers did not identify or report specimens positive for both Stx and S. sonnei. Routine Stx testing and fecal culture for patients with a clinically compatible illness may increase detection of infections with this pathogen in the future. Prompt identification is reliant upon timely reporting of results of Stx tests and fecal culture. The increasing use of multipanel culture-independent diagnostic tests may aid detection of Stx-producing Shigella infections. However, results must be interpreted with caution, and confirmatory testing by culture will be needed to distinguish between infection with Stx-producing Shigella and co-infections with Shigella and STEC. Enhanced surveillance by public health officials is advised, particularly for the possibility of emergence and spread of Stx2-producing Shigella infections, which may be more clinically severe. Transmission in high-risk settings such as childcare is of particular concern because of the potential for severe clinical outcomes in the affected populations. Although severe outcomes were not observed in the patient infected with stx2a-encoding S. sonnei reported by Nyholm et al. (12), the potential for increased virulence of Stx-producing S. sonnei cannot be ruled out at this time.

Challenges associated with surveillance, reporting, clinical management, and public health follow-up of both shigellosis and STEC in the United States may become more prevalent as the incidence of Stx-producing Shigella infections increases. Because Stx-producing Shigella infections have been identified in Europe and the Americas, clinicians and public health officials worldwide should remain vigilant for cases of HUS or other sequelae in infected persons. Since our investigation concluded, cases of Stx1-producing S. sonnei have continued to be identified and reported from San Joaquin County. Surveillance for additional cases is ongoing in California to better characterize the clinical and epidemiologic features of infections with Stx-producing S. sonnei.

Ms. Lamba is an epidemiologist with the Infectious Diseases Branch of the California Department of Public Health. Her research interests include foodborne outbreak investigations and the epidemiology of infectious diseases.



We thank Ernie Q. Awa, Jackie Hopkins, Sonia S. Hunter, Grace Kang, Patricia Lundeen, Azarnoush Maroufi, Eric C. McDonald, Francisco McGann, Vicente Mendivil, Brian P. Murphy, S. Samantha Tweeten, Danielle Womack, Rocio Agraz-Lara, Karen M. Pfister, Diane Schultz, Melody Valdivia, Stephen Klish, Quyen Phan, Sandra Walden, William S. Probert, Peng Zhang, Yue Qing Zhao, and Debra Gilliss for their contributions to this investigation.

This study was supported in part by the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases cooperative agreement CDC-RFA-CK14-1401PPHF14 from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



  1. Tesh  VL, O’Brien  AD. The pathogenic mechanisms of Shiga toxin and the Shiga-like toxins. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:181722 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. O’Loughlin  EV, Robins-Browne  RM. Effect of Shiga toxin and Shiga-like toxins on eukaryotic cells. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:493507. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wadolkowski  EA, Sung  LM, Burris  JA, Samuel  JE, O’Brien  AD. Acute renal tubular necrosis and death of mice orally infected with Escherichia coli strains that produce Shiga-like toxin type II. Infect Immun. 1990;58:395965 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerlin  P, McEwen  SA, Boerlin-Petzold  F, Wilson  JB, Johnson  RP, Gyles  CL. Associations between virulence factors of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli and disease in humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:497503 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler  T. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome during shigellosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106:3959. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wong  CS, Jelacic  S, Habeeb  RL, Watkins  SL, Tarr  PI. The risk of the hemolytic-uremic syndrome after antibiotic treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:19306. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta  SK, Strockbine  N, Omondi  M, Hise  K, Fair  MA, Mintz  E. Emergence of Shiga toxin 1 genes within Shigella dysenteriae type 4 isolates from travelers returning from the Island of Hispanola. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:11635 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray  MD, Lampel  KA, Strockbine  NA, Fernandez  RE, Melton-Celsa  AR, Maurelli  AT. Clinical isolates of Shiga toxin 1a–producing Shigella flexneri with an epidemiological link to recent travel to Hispañiola. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:166977. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekal  S, Pilon  PA, Cloutier  N, Doualla-Bell  F, Longtin  J. Identification of Shigella flexneri isolates carrying the Shiga toxin 1–producing gene in Quebec, Canada, linked to travel to Haiti. Can J Microbiol. 2015;61:9956 http://dx.doi.orh/10.1139/cjm-2015-0538. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gray  MD, Lacher  DW, Leonard  SR, Abbott  J, Zhao  S, Lampel  KA, Prevalence of Stx-producing Shigella species isolated from French travellers returning from the Caribbean: an emerging pathogen with international implications. Clin Microbiol Infect. Epub 2015 May 14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Beutin  L, Strauch  E, Fischer  I. Isolation of Shigella sonnei lysogenic for a bacteriophage encoding gene for production of Shiga toxin. Lancet. 1999;353:1498. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nyholm  O, Lienemann  T, Halkilahti  J, Mero  S, Rimhanen-Finne  R, Lehtinen  V, Characterization of Shigella sonnei isolate carrying Shiga toxin 2–producing gene [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:8912. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Enteric Disease surveillance: Shigella annual report—appendices, 2012. Atlanta: The Centers; 2014 [cited 2015 Sep 23].
  14. Struelens  MJ, Patte  D, Kabir  I, Salam  A, Nath  SK, Butler  T. Shigella septicemia: prevalence, presentation, risk factors, and outcome. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:78490. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hawkins  C, Taiwo  B, Bolon  M, Julka  K, Adewole  A, Stosor  V. Shigella sonnei bacteremia: two adult cases and review of the literature. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39:170–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Papasian  CJ, Enna-Kifer  S, Garrison  B. Symptomatic Shigella sonnei urinary tract infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2222–3.
  17. Anatoliotaki  M. Galanakis E, Tsekoura T, Schinaki A, Stefanaki S, Tsilimigaki A. Urinary tract infection caused by Shigella sonnei. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35:431–3.
  18. World Health Organization Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development. Guidelines for the control of shigellosis, including epidemics due to Shigella dysenteriae type 1. 2005 [cited 2015 Sep 23].
  19. Probert  WS, McQuaid  C, Schrader  K. Isolation and identification of an Enterobacter cloacae strain producing a novel subtype of Shiga toxin type 1. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:234651. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Standard operating procedures for PulseNet PFGE for Escherichia coli O157, Escherichia coli non-O157 STEC, Salmonella serotypes, Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri. 2013 Apr [cited 2015 Sep 17].
  21. US Census Bureau. Hispanic or Latino origin universe: Total population. 2014 American Community Survey 1-year estimates. American Factfinder B03003 [cited 2015 Sep 23].
  22. Khan  WA, Griffiths  JK, Bennish  ML. Gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal manifestations of childhood shigellosis in a region where all four species of Shigella are endemic. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64097. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mandell  W, Neu  H. Shigella bacteraemia in adults. JAMA. 1986;255:31167. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bennish  ML, Khan  WA, Begum  M, Bridges  EA, Ahmed  S, Saha  D, Low risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome after early effective antimicrobial therapy for Shigella dysenteriae type 1 infection in Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:356–62. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang  X, McDaniel  AD, Wolf  LE, Keusch  GT, Waldor  MK, Acheson  DWK. Quinolone antibiotics induce Shiga toxin encoding bacteriophages, toxin production, and death in mice. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:66470 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. 2013 Apr [cited 2015 Sep 23].




Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers. You must be a registered user on If you are not registered on, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website to register. Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider, For technical assistance, contact American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please refer to The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the certificate and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title:
Shiga Toxin 1–producing Shigella sonnei Infections, California, United States, 2014–2015

CME Questions

1. Your patient is a 32-year-old man in whom Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1)–producing Shigella sonnei infection is suspected. According to the surveillance study by Lamba and colleagues, which of the following statements about the epidemiologic features of recent emergence of Stx1-producing S. sonnei in the United States is correct?

A.        In 2014, Stx1-producing S. sonnei infections were detected in New Mexico

B.         All reported cases were epidemiologically linked to travel to Mexico

C.        All isolates encoded stx1 and produced active Stx1, with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) revealing multiple PFGE patterns

D.        In cluster 1 (mostly in San Diego), case-patients were less likely to be Hispanic than the general population

2. According to the surveillance study by Lamba and colleagues, which of the following statements about the clinical characteristics of recent Stx1-producing S. sonnei infections in the United States is correct?

A.        All patients had bloody diarrhea

B.         Half of patients had abdominal cramps

C.        Three-quarters of patients required hospitalization

D.        Case-patients younger than 5 years vs. those age 5 years and older were more likely to have fever (100% vs. 67%; p = 0.054) and bloody diarrhea (80% vs. 68%; not significant)

3. According to the surveillance study by Lamba and colleagues, which of the following statements about antibiotic resistance, treatment, and outcomes of recent Stx1-producing S. sonnei infections in the United States would most likely be correct?

A.        The most common profile of antibiotic resistance included resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and ampicillin

B.         Most case-patients did not receive antibiotic treatment

C.        One-quarter of case-patients treated with antibiotics had hemolytic uremic syndrome

D.        Mortality rate was 10%

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree







Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2204.151825

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 4—April 2016

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Katherine Lamba, Infectious Diseases Branch, California Department of Public Health, 850 Marina Bay Pkwy, Richmond, CA 94804, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 15, 2016
Page updated: March 15, 2016
Page reviewed: March 15, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.