Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Supplement—December 2022
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Clinical

Effects of COVID-19 on Vaccine-Preventable Disease Surveillance Systems in the World Health Organization African Region, 2020

John Paul BigouetteComments to Author , Anna W. Callaghan, Morgane Donadel, Angela Montesanti Porter, Louie Rosencrans, Jacquelyn S. Lickness, Sara Blough, Xi Li, Robert T. Perry, A.J. Williams, Heather M. Scobie, Benjamin A. Dahl, Jeffrey McFarland, and Christopher S. Murrill
Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Impact of COVID-19 on measles and rubella, AFP/polio, and other VPD surveillance systems according to 154 STOP Program consultants in the World Health Organization’s African Region, 2020*

Category No. (%) respondents
Measles and rubella AFP/polio Other VPDs
Compared to 2019, in 2020 did COVID-19 impact surveillance overall?
Severely impacted 66 (43) 66 (43) 38 (25)
Somewhat impacted 83 (54) 84 (55) 92 (60)
Not at all impacted 3 (2) 3 (2) 15 (10)
Does not know 2 (1) 1 (1) 9 (6)
Missing response
0
0
0
Compared to 2019, in 2020 did you conduct active surveillance?
Increased active surveillance 3 (2) 1 (1) 2 (1)
Same level of active surveillance 21 (14) 19 (12) 24 (16)
Decreased active surveillance 108 (70) 119 (77) 100 (65)
No active surveillance 20 (13) 13 (8) 24 (16)
Does not know 0 0 0
Missing response
2 (1)
2 (1)
4 (3)
Compared to 2019, in 2020 did staffing change for surveillance at your level of responsibility?
Staffing increased 4 (2) 11 (7) 4 (3)
No change in staffing 103 (67) 89 (58) 107 (69)
Staffing decreased 23 (15) 31 (20) 24 (16)
Does not know 23 (15) 22 (14) 18 (12)
Missing response
1 (1)
1 (1)
1 (1)
Compared to 2019, in 2020 did COVID-19 impact adversely the detection, notification and reporting of cases?
Yes 94 (61) 106 (69) 94 (61)
No 37 (24) 40 (26) 39 (25)
Does not know 22 (14) 7 (5) 20 (13)
Missing response
1 (1)
1 (1)
1 (1)
For responses indicating an adverse impact on the detection, notification, and reporting of VPD cases, identify the health care level impacted (select all that apply)
At the national level 24 (26) 37 (35) 29 (30)
At the province level 40 (43) 50 (47) 45 (48)
At the district level 75 (80) 81 (76) 72 (77)
At the local level
86 (92)
92 (87)
85 (90)
Compared to 2019, in 2020 did COVID-19 mitigation efforts disrupt the transport of specimens of suspected VPD cases to relevant who reference laboratories?
Yes 50 (32) 73 (47) 42 (27)
No 50 (32) 36 (23) 44 (29)
Does not know 52 (34) 44 (29) 66 (43)
Missing response 2 (1) 1 (1) 2 (1)

*AFP, acute flaccid paralysis, VPD, vaccine-preventable disease.

†Percentages may not equal 100% because of rounding.

Main Article

Page created: August 25, 2022
Page updated: December 11, 2022
Page reviewed: December 11, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external