Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 2—February 2023
Dispatch

(Mis)perception and Use of Unsterile Water in Home Medical Devices, PN View 360+ Survey, United States, August 20211

Shanna MikoComments to Author , Sarah A. Collier, Claire E. Burns-Lynch, Ashley A. Andújar, Katharine M. Benedict, Julia C. Haston, Catherine O. Hough, and Jennifer R. Cope
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (S. Miko, S.A. Collier, C.E. Burns-Lynch, A.A. Andújar, K.M. Benedict, J.C. Haston, C.O. Hough, J.R. Cope); Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA (C.E. Burns-Lynch); Chenega Enterprise System & Solutions, Chesapeake, Virginia, USA (C.O. Hough)

Main Article

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of 1,004 respondents to question about potential uses for tap water, by response, in survey of knowledge about uses for tap water, PN 360 View 2021, United States*

Characteristic Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about US tap water?
Can be used for drinking Can be used for rinsing contact lenses Can be used for nasal rinsing Can be used in respiratory devices† Bacteria and other living things are not present in US tap water
I don’t know
38
140
157
194
119
General population
81 (78‒83)
50 (47‒54)
62 (59‒66)
42 (38‒45)
33 (30‒36)
Sex
F 77 (73‒81) 43 (38‒48) 58 (52‒63) 37 (32‒42 24 (20‒28)
M 84 (81‒88) 57 (52‒62) 67 (62,72) 46 (41‒51) 42 (37‒47)
p value
0.0090
0.0002
0.0073
0.0153
<0.0001
Race
Black or African American 76 (68‒84) 47 (37‒57) 58 (48,68) 48 (37‒58) 48 (38‒58)
Other‡ 69 (59‒78) 46 (35‒57) 57 (46,68) 35 (24‒45) 26 (17‒35)
p value
0.0013
0.5781
0.2917
0.2145
0.0039
Ethnicity
Hispanic§ 67 (58‒76) 48 (38‒58) 60 (51,70) 38 (28‒48) 31 (22‒40)
Non-Hispanic 83 (81‒86) 50 (47‒54) 63 (59,66) 42 (38‒46) 33 (30‒37)
p value <0.0001 0.7034 0.6528 0.4189 0.6011
Age, y
18–34 73 (68‒79) 50 (44‒56) 65 (59,71) 45 (38‒52) 38 (31‒44)
35–54 80 (75‒85) 52 (46‒58) 58 (52,64) 37 (31‒43) 35 (29‒40)
>55 86 (82‒90) 49 (43‒55) 64 (58,70) 43 (36‒49) 28 (23‒33)
p value
0.0008
0.7743
0.2784
0.1910
0.0378
Region
Northeast 80 (74‒87) 59 (51‒67) 66 (57,74) 49 (41‒58) 34 (26‒41)
Midwest 85 (80‒90) 46 (38‒54) 60 (53,68) 41 (33‒49) 33 (26‒41)
South 82 (78‒86) 48 (42‒54) 63 (58,69) 40 (34‒45 34 (29‒39)
West 75 (68‒81) 51 (44‒58) 61 (54,68) 39 (32‒47) 30 (24‒37)
p value
0.0663
0.1199
0.7756
0.2810
0.8283
Metro status
Urban 81 (76‒86) 59 (52‒65) 66 (60,72) 49 (43‒56) 44 (38‒50)
Suburban 79 (75‒83) 46 (40‒51) 59 (54,64) 38 (32‒43) 28 (24‒33)
Rural 83 (78‒88) 47 (40‒55) 64 (57,72) 39 (31‒46) 28 (21‒34)
p value
0.5218
0.0052
0.1933
0.0163
<0.001
Household income
<$59,999 79 (76‒83) 48 (43‒53) 62 (57,66) 39 (35‒44) 31 (26‒35)
>$60,000 82 (78‒86) 53 (47‒58) 63 (58,68) 44 (39‒50) 36 (31‒41)
p value
0.2638
0.2013
0.6294
0.1722
0.0978
Water source¶
Private well 90 (85‒96) 63 (54‒72) 71 (63‒79) 55 (46‒65) 48 (39‒57)
Municipal 81 (78‒84) 48 (44‒52) 61 (57‒65) 39 (35‒43) 30 (26‒34)
p value 0.0101 0.0046 0.0540 0.0009 0.0002

*Values are percentages agreeing (95% CIs) unless otherwise indicated. Boldface indicates significance (p<0.05 by χ2 or by Wald F-tests where there are >3 categories). “I don’t know” was not included in analysis; “Agree” and “Strongly Agree” were analyzed as “Agree”; “Disagree” and “Strongly Disagree” were not included in analysis. PN, Porter Novelli Public Services and the ENGINE Insights’ PN View 360+ Survey. †Respiratory devices include vaporizers, humidifiers, and continuous positive airway pressure machines. ‡Other race grouped persons who identified as >1 race, Asian, Native American, Alaska Native, or other because of small sample size. §Hispanic, Spanish, or Latino. ¶n = 932.

Main Article

1Preliminary results from this study were presented at the 2022 Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Conference, May 2‒5, 2022, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Page created: December 06, 2022
Page updated: January 21, 2023
Page reviewed: January 21, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external