Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 6—June 2023
Dispatch

High Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection Despite High Seroprevalence, Sweden, 2022

Author affiliations: Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden (R. Groenheit, I. Galanis, K. Sondén, I. Bujila, T. Efimova, F. Garli, O. Karlsson Lindsjö, M. Mansjö, E. Movert, A. Pettke, M. Rapp, M. Sperk, S. Söderholm, K. Valentin Asin, S. Zanetti, M. Lind Karlberg, A. Bråve, K. Blom, J. Klingström); Swedish Armed Forces, Umeå, Sweden and Lund University, Lund, Sweden (P. Bacchus); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (K. Sondén, M. Sperk, K. Blom, J. Klingström); Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (J. Klingström)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We performed 2 surveys during 2022 to estimate point prevalences of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with overall seroprevalence in Sweden. Point prevalence was 1.4% in March and 1.5% in September. Estimated seroprevalence was >80%, including among unvaccinated children. Continued SARS-CoV-2 surveillance is necessary for detecting emerging, possibly more pathogenic variants.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has had strong effects on the COVID-19 pandemic. New Omicron subvariants have emerged over time and those subvariants have increased capacity to evade neutralizing antibody responses induced by both vaccines and prior infections, causing breakthrough infections and reinfections (14). After general PCR testing was halted in Sweden in early 2022, the possibility to track the COVID-19 situation and maintain surveillance in the general population largely depended on point prevalence surveys to detect acute SARS-CoV-2 infection by using PCR and estimates of previous infections by using serology. We performed 2 cross-sectional surveys during 2022 to estimate SARS-CoV-2 point prevalences and overall seroprevalence in Sweden.

The Study

Participants were invited from a nationwide probability-based web panel (5,6). Participants received material for sampling and instructions on how to perform self-sampling at home (Appendix). The first survey, March 21–25, covered all 21 regions in Sweden; the second survey, September 26–29, covered 11 regions in the country, representing 64% of the population. We performed surveys as part of the Public Health Agency of Sweden’s assignment to monitor communicable diseases and evaluate infection control measures (in accordance with §§18 of Ordinance 2021:248 from the Swedish Parliament). All participants provided informed consent, and the legal guardian provided consent for persons <16 years of age.

Figure

Flowchart of study participant enrollment and collected and analyzed samples in a study of prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection despite high seroprevalence, Sweden, 2022. A) Surveys performed during March 21–25. B) Surveys performed September 26–29. Point prevalence and Omicron subvariant data from the September study was published previously (6).

Figure. Flowchart of study participant enrollment and collected and analyzed samples in a study of prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection despite high seroprevalence, Sweden, 2022. A) Surveys performed during March 21–25....

In March, 11,334 persons were invited and 2,906 persons 2–96 years of age participated (Appendix Table 1). In total, we analyzed 2,659 samples for ongoing infection and 2,587 samples for serologic responses (Figure, panel A). We detected 48 PCR-positive samples showing SARS-CoV-2 infection, an estimated point prevalence of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9%–2.1%) in the population of Sweden at the end of March. One infection was caused by the Delta variant and 47 by Omicron subvariants (Appendix Table 2). Data from the national registry for communicable diseases revealed that 633 (24%) of the 2,659 participants with a valid PCR result had >1 previous confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; 79.4% had received >3 vaccine doses (Table 1). Among 48 participants with PCR-positive results, 4 (8.3%) had previously reported SARS-CoV-2 infections. On the basis of spike IgG data from the 2,587 participants with a valid sample for serology, we estimated a 93.3% (95% CI 91.5%–94.8%) SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the population of Sweden at the end of March 2022. The estimated seroprevalence was 80.1% (95% CI 71.1%–87.4%) in children <11 years of age and 94.2%–98.8% in persons >11 years of age (Table 2).

In the September survey, 10,568 persons were invited and 1,774 persons 2–94 years of age participated. We were able to analyze 1,687 samples for ongoing infection (Appendix Table 1), and 1,554 samples for serologic responses (Figure, panel B). We previously reported that 31 of 1,687 participants were PCR-positive in September, that the estimated point prevalence was 1.5% (95% CI 0.9%–2.5%), and all infections were caused by Omicron subvariants (6). Among participants in the September survey, 485 (29%) had >1 previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; 85.5% had received >3 vaccine doses (Table 1). Among PCR-positive participants, 22 (71%) had previously reported SARS-CoV-2 infections. On the basis of spike IgG data (n = 1,554), we estimated that SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Sweden was 93.1% (95% CI 89.2%–96.0%) at end of September. Estimated seroprevalence was 84.0% (95% CI 70.3%–93.3%) in persons 2–11 years of age and 84.9%–100% in persons >11 years of age (Table 2).

Using answers in the participant symptom survey, we next analyzed for symptoms in general and for symptoms among SARS-CoV-2–infected participants. Overall, 65.2% of participants in March and 67.7% of participants in September, experienced >1 symptom within 2 weeks before sampling. Of participants with negative PCR results, 64.6% in March and 67.3% in September had >1 symptom (Appendix Table 3). Among 79 PCR-positive participants, 4 had no symptoms within 2 weeks before sampling (Appendix Table 3), and 3 of those 4 experienced symptoms within 1 week after sampling.

Conclusions

Beginning February 9, 2022, mainly hospitalized persons, healthcare workers, long-term care facility staff, and at-risk persons with symptoms indicating COVID-19, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sweden. Because the general population was no longer tested, trends in prevalence and transmission patterns were difficult to assess in real-time. To estimate point prevalence of infection in the population, Sweden needed random sampling of the population on a nationwide level.

We estimated point prevalences in Sweden of 1.4% during March 21–25 and, as previously reported (6), 1.5% during September 26–29. Those estimated point prevalences were higher than those in our previous national surveys (5). In another survey of healthcare workers in Stockholm during June 28–29, 2022, we observed asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in 2.3% of participants (7). Although healthcare workers are likely at higher risk for infection than the general population, those 3 surveys collectively indicated a continued high level of Omicron transmission in Sweden during March, June, and September 2022. Similar, or even higher, point prevalences were reported from other countries during 2022. For example, surveys performed on the general population in the United Kingdom estimated point prevalences of 6.7%–8.7% in March and 2.1%–2.5% in September for England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (8). Moreover, a survey of blood donors in Denmark estimated that, by March 2022, ≈66% of the age-matched healthy population had been infected by SARS-CoV-2 in <5 months (9). Taken together, those and many other reports show the high capacity of Omicron to spread, including among highly vaccinated populations.

A large percentage of the population were positive for spike IgG in March and in September 2022, which can partly be explained by the high vaccine coverage in Sweden. COVID-19 vaccination was not recommended for children <12 years of age in Sweden. Hence, in the youngest, unvaccinated, age group, seroconversion was likely induced solely by infection, indicating that a large percentage (80%) of that age group had already been infected with SARS-CoV-2 by March 2022. Similar levels of infections in children have been reported from Bavaria, Germany, including seroprevalences of 67% for preschool children 1–4 years of age and 84% for school-age children 5–10 years of age in June 2022, largely caused by the Omicron variant (10).

Current vaccines seem to provide only limited, short-term, inhibitory effect on Omicron transmissibility (11). Of note, our surveys showed that among PCR-positive participants in March, 8.3% had a previously recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection, but in September, those participants increased to 71%, indicating a high level of reinfection caused by then circulating Omicron subvariants, which have shown highly increased capacity to avoid neutralizing antibodies (1214).

In summary, we estimate that ≈1 of every 66 persons in Sweden was infected with SARS-CoV-2 by March and September 2022. Although Omicron has a high transmission capacity, current vaccines protect against severe disease, as noted by the low fatality rate observed in Omicron-infected persons in Denmark (9). However, because Omicron has the capacity to efficiently transmit despite high vaccine coverage, continued surveillance of the general population for early signs of new, more possibly pathogenic, emerging SARS-COV-2 variants remains crucial.

Dr. Groenheit is a microbiologist at the Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden. Her primary interests include tuberculosis, especially focusing on drug resistance and molecular epidemiology, and SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and seroprevalence.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants in the survey for volunteering to perform self-sampling and completing symptom questionnaires. We thank the Swedish Armed Forces, whose personnel from regular units and Home Guard units collected and transported the samples.

This work was funded by grants provided to the Public Health Agency of Sweden (grant nos. S2020/0281/FS and S2020/08532 FS).

Top

References

  1. Tegally  H, Moir  M, Everatt  J, Giovanetti  M, Scheepers  C, Wilkinson  E, et al.; NGS-SA consortium. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages BA.4 and BA.5 in South Africa. Nat Med. 2022;28:178590. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dejnirattisai  W, Shaw  RH, Supasa  P, Liu  C, Stuart  AS, Pollard  AJ, et al.; Com-COV2 study group. Reduced neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 omicron B.1.1.529 variant by post-immunisation serum. Lancet. 2022;399:2346. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tuekprakhon  A, Nutalai  R, Dijokaite-Guraliuc  A, Zhou  D, Ginn  HM, Selvaraj  M, et al.; OPTIC Consortium; ISARIC4C Consortium. Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum. Cell. 2022;185:24222433.e13. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blom  K, Marking  U, Havervall  S, Norin  NG, Gordon  M, García  M, et al. Immune responses after omicron infection in triple-vaccinated health-care workers with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:9435. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Groenheit  R, Beser  J, Kühlmann Berenzon  S, Galanis  I, van Straten  E, Duracz  J, et al. Point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sweden at six time points during 2020. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22:861. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Groenheit  R, Galanis  I, Sondén  K, Sperk  M, Movert  E, Bacchus  P, et al. Rapid emergence of omicron sublineages expressing spike protein R346T. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;24:100564. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blom  K, Havervall  S, Marking  U, Norin  NG, Bacchus  P, Groenheit  R, et al. Infection rate of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic healthcare workers, Sweden, June 2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:211921. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Office for National Statistics. United Kingdom. Coronavirus (COVID-19) [cited 2022 December 1]. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases
  9. Erikstrup  C, Laksafoss  AD, Gladov  J, Kaspersen  KA, Mikkelsen  S, Hindhede  L, et al. Seroprevalence and infection fatality rate of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Denmark: A nationwide serosurveillance study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022;21:100479. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ott  R, Achenbach  P, Ewald  DA, Friedl  N, Gemulla  G, Hubmann  M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in preschool and school-age children. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022;119:76570. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Woodbridge  Y, Amit  S, Huppert  A, Kopelman  NM. Viral load dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants following multiple vaccine doses and previous infection. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6706. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hachmann  NP, Miller  J, Collier  AY, Ventura  JD, Yu  J, Rowe  M, et al. Neutralization escape by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:868. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Qu  P, Evans  JP, Faraone  JN, Zheng  Y-M, Carlin  C, Anghelina  M, et al. Enhanced neutralization resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BQ.1, BQ.1.1, BA.4.6, BF.7, and BA.2.75.2. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:917.e3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sheward  DJ, Kim  C, Fischbach  J, Sato  K, Muschiol  S, Ehling  RA, et al. Omicron sublineage BA.2.75.2 exhibits extensive escape from neutralising antibodies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:153840. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2906.221862

Original Publication Date: May 04, 2023

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 6—June 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kim Blom, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Nobels väg 18, 171 65 Solna, Sweden

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: April 17, 2023
Page updated: May 17, 2023
Page reviewed: May 17, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external