Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 4—April 2024
CME ACTIVITY - Research

Deaths Associated with Pediatric Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology, United States, October 2021–June 2023

Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article

Introduction

CME Logo

Medscape CME ACTIVITY

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at https://www.medscape.org/qna/processor/71283?showStandAlone=true&src=prt_jcme_eid_mscpedu; and (4) view/print certificate.

NOTE: It is Medscape's policy to avoid the use of Brand names in accredited activities. However, in an effort to be as clear as possible, the use of brand names should not be viewed as a promotion of any brand or as an endorsement by Medscape of specific products.

Release date: March 19, 2024; Expiration date: March 19, 2025
Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Assess the epidemiology of a global outbreak of acute hepatitis among children between 2021 and 2023

  • Evaluate the demographic data of children who died during this outbreak of acute hepatitis

  • Analyze the clinical presentation of children who died during this outbreak of acute hepatitis

  • Distinguish the rate of positive polymerase chain reaction testing for adenovirus among children who died during this outbreak of acute hepatitis

CME Editor

Dana C. Dolan, BS, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Dana C. Dolan, BS, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Charles P. Vega, MD, Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California. Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships: served as a consultant or advisor for Boehringer Ingelheim; GlaxoSmithKline.

Authors

Olivia Almendares, MSPH; Julia M. Baker, PhD; David Sugerman, MD; Umesh D. Parashar, MD, MBBS; Sarah Reagan-Steiner, MD; Hannah L. Kirking, MD; Paul Gastanaduy, MD; Jacqueline E. Tate, PhD.

Top

Abstract

During October 2021–June 2023, a total of 392 cases of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in children in the United States were reported to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as part of national surveillance. We describe demographic and clinical characteristics, including potential involvement of adenovirus in development of acute hepatitis, of 8 fatally ill children who met reporting criteria. The children had diverse courses of illness. Two children were immunocompromised when initially brought for care. Four children tested positive for adenovirus in multiple specimen types, including 2 for whom typing was completed. One adenovirus-positive child had no known underlying conditions, supporting a potential relationship between adenovirus and acute hepatitis in previously healthy children. Our findings emphasize the importance of continued investigation to determine the mechanism of liver injury and appropriate treatment. Testing for adenovirus in similar cases could elucidate the role of the virus.

During October–November 2021, clinicians at a single children’s hospital in Alabama, USA, identified 5 previously healthy children with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology who tested positive for adenovirus species F, type 41 (1); that pathogen was not previously considered a common cause of severe acute hepatitis in immunocompetent persons. In subsequent months, similar cases were identified internationally (2), prompting the launch of a nationwide public health investigation into pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in the United States. On April 21, 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a health advisory recommending that clinicians consider adenovirus testing in pediatric patients with hepatitis of unknown etiology and that patients meeting the following criteria be reported to jurisdictional health departments: <10 years of age with hepatitis manifested by elevated (>500 U/L) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and onset since October 1, 2021 (3).

As of June 6, 2023, health departments reported to CDC a total of 392 children meeting the hepatitis of unknown etiology case criteria. Worldwide, as of July 8, 2022, a total of 1,010 probable cases were reported to the World Health Organization on the basis of a closely aligned case criterion: children <16 years experiencing acute, non-‒A-E hepatitis with AST or ALT >500 IU/L since October 1, 2021. Despite similar case definitions, the United States was one of the few countries to report fatalities (2).

Severe acute hepatitis is known to have several potential etiologies, including drug-induced, genetic, metabolic, infectious, or immune-mediated causes (4). Adenovirus is a well-known cause of severe hepatitis in immunocompromised persons; it often has a direct pathologic effect on the liver (47). Conversely, few reported cases describe a potential association between adenovirus and severe acute hepatitis in immunocompetent children; the mechanism of liver injury in immunocompetent children is poorly understood (811). Previous studies estimate that 30%–50% of acute liver failure occurring in children without prior liver disease was of undetermined cause (7,12). However, adenovirus was commonly detected among children tested for the virus in recent investigations in the United States (116/275, 42%) (13) and United Kingdom (14) (170/258, 66%), raising the question of whether adenovirus may be an underrecognized cause of pediatric acute hepatitis.

We describe the characteristics of children who died after hepatitis of unknown etiology and were reported to CDC as part of the national-level investigation. Second, we describe the potential involvement of adenovirus and other pathogens in the development of severe acute hepatitis among these children. Last, we contextualize the deaths within the broader national-level investigation, describing similarities and differences between this subset of patients with the most severe outcomes and the overall patient population.

Methods

Study Population and Data Collection

This study includes all deaths reported to CDC among US children with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology with onset of October 1, 2021‒June 6, 2023. A child was reported if they initially met the criteria defined in the CDC health advisory and if the child’s death was related to their hepatitis episode, regardless of the time between hepatitis onset and death. Reported cases underwent further investigation including medical chart abstractions, caregiver interviews, laboratory testing, and, when possible, pathologic evaluation of liver tissue specimens. Health departments or clinicians completed medical chart abstractions using a standardized case report form to collect demographics, medical and illness history, laboratory test results, treatment received, and outcomes. Interviews were conducted with a parent or caregiver at the discretion of the health department to obtain additional information on each patient’s symptoms; healthcare use; ill contacts at home, school, or daycare; and other potential exposures such as diet and travel. In addition, autopsy reports, discharge summaries, death certificates, and other available medical records were requested for further review to better understand the course of illness and elucidate the possible role of adenovirus or other pathogens in development of severe acute hepatitis and death.

Specimen Collection and Testing

Laboratory testing for clinical management was not standardized; testing varied by individual patient and by clinical judgment. Most respiratory and fecal specimens were tested locally by multiplex PCR panel. In addition, testing for adenovirus by nucleic acid amplification testing (e.g., PCR or quantitative PCR) of blood, respiratory, or stool samples was requested at the discretion of the treating clinician and conducted at a clinical or reference laboratory. Available residual adenovirus-positive blood, stool, respiratory, and tissue specimens were sent to select reference laboratories or CDC for adenovirus typing using Sanger sequencing of the 6 hypervariable regions of the hexon gene (15). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from liver biopsy, explant, or autopsy underwent routine evaluation at the clinical institutions or medical examiner’s office; available specimens were submitted to CDC. CDC’s evaluation of specimens included histopathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and conventional PCR and sequencing for adenovirus, as well as IHC and PCR for other infectious etiologies, as indicated based on the pathologic findings and clinical and epidemiologic history.

Record Review

All deaths reported to CDC as part of the hepatitis of unknown etiology investigation through June 6, 2023, are noted in this report. Some children were excluded as cases by the reporting jurisdiction as additional clinical information became available and an etiology was identified. For the remaining children, clinical and epidemiology teams at CDC reviewed all available medical records and related laboratory and pathological evaluations to develop consensus opinions on possible etiologies and confirm each child met the reporting criteria. Two pediatricians (P.A.G. and H.L.K.) independently evaluated reported underlying medical conditions to determine whether those conditions may have contributed to development of or increased risk for acute hepatitis. We excluded children with an etiology for their hepatitis from further investigation and analysis. We describe here in detail the children with no known or suspected etiology after review of all available records.

Statistical Analysis

We used descriptive statistics to summarize the data and results. We analyzed all data in R version 4.2.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org). CDC reviewed the investigation protocol and confirmed that it was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy (45 C.F.R. part 46.102(l)(2), 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. §241(d); 5 U.S.C. §552a; 44 U.S.C. §3501 et seq.).

Results

Eligibility and Record Availability

During the national investigation, a total of 23 pediatric deaths with hepatitis onset occurring during October 1, 2021–June 6, 2023, were reported to CDC from 13 US jurisdictions: Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New York City, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin (Table 1). Fourteen (60.9%) of the 23 children did not meet the reporting criteria defined in the health advisory on the basis of detailed medical record and laboratory testing review by the reporting jurisdiction or CDC. The most common reason for exclusion was identification of an alternative etiology for the hepatitis (n = 12). Alternative etiologies were complications of sepsis from pathogens other than adenovirus (n = 6), congenital conditions (n = 3), and unintentional injury (n = 3) (Table 1). After review of all information provided to CDC, 8 (34.8%) children were confirmed to meet the reporting criteria and are further described in this report. One child’s eligibility could not be determined because records were unavailable.

Record availability differed by child (Table 2). A case report form was completed for all children, whereas an exposure questionnaire was available for 5 (62.5%). An autopsy had been conducted for 4 children; all those reports were available for review. A discharge summary was available for all 8 children and a death certificate was available for 6. Other available records included emergency department visit notes, admission history and physical notes, progress and consultation notes, and additional laboratory and radiologic testing results. FFPE autopsy tissue specimens from 3 children were submitted to CDC for evaluation; of those 3 children, 1 also had native liver explant submitted, and 1 a liver biopsy.

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics at Initial Visit

The median age at acute hepatitis onset was 2.4 (range 0.2–6.3) years (Table 3). Five patients (62.5%) were male and 3 (37.5%) female; 5 (5/8, 62.5%) identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. At initial visit, 2 children were immunocompromised and receiving immunosuppressive therapy (1 for ongoing cancer treatment and 1 after liver transplant), 2 other children had conditions that may have increased their risk of developing hepatitis or complications of adenovirus infection in the right clinical circumstance (1 was small for gestational age; 1 had history of poor weight gain and possible gastrointestinal disorder), and 4 children had no known underlying conditions (Table 3; Appendix Table 1). Children with underlying conditions that may have increased their risk and those with no known underlying conditions are henceforth called previously healthy.

All children manifested hepatitis signs and symptoms (i.e., dark colored urine, pale stool, jaundice, or scleral icterus); most also reported other systemic symptoms (87.5%), gastrointestinal symptoms (87.5%), and respiratory symptoms (75.0%) during their illness course (Table 3; Appendix Table 2). The median duration of symptoms before emergency department or inpatient admission was 7 (range 1–36) days (Figure). Laboratory evaluations showed elevated transaminases; median peak ALT was 4,852 (range 219–5,648) U/L and AST 7,500 (range 786–10,000) U/L. Median peak total bilirubin level was 13.7 (range 1.3–19.4) mg/dL and INR was 8.0 (range 1.4–13.0) (Table 3). Before the hepatitis episode, all but 1 child had received >2 doses of hepatitis B vaccine >3 weeks before their hepatitis episode (62.5% had 3 or 4 doses) and 5 children had received 1 or 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine >3 months before their hepatitis episode. One child had received COVID-19 vaccine >3 months before the episode.

Adenovirus and Other Pathogen Testing

For every child, >2 specimen types were tested for adenovirus by multiplex PCR panel (using respiratory or stool specimens) or by quantitative PCR (using blood specimens); the most common specimen types tested were blood (n = 7), respiratory (nasopharyngeal, n = 6), FFPE liver tissue (n = 6), and stool/rectal swab (n = 3) (Table 4). Four of the 8 children tested positive for adenovirus; each was positive in both respiratory specimens and whole blood. One child also tested positive in stool and another in both serum and liver tissue. Blood specimens had the highest adenovirus detection rate (4/7, 57.1%), particularly whole blood (4/5, 80%). Adenovirus typing data were available for 2 children.

Of the 4 children who tested positive for adenovirus, 2 (patients 1 and 2) had immunocompromising conditions before hepatitis onset; 1 was positive for adenovirus species B, type 7 (respiratory and stool samples), and 1 was positive for species C, type 1, in whole blood and species C in liver tissue. The third child (patient 3), initially immunocompetent, tested positive for adenovirus (type unknown) after becoming immunocompromised after a liver transplant received during the initial hospital stay; before the liver transplant, the child had tested negative for adenovirus in respiratory, whole blood, and liver specimens. The fourth child (patient 4) who tested positive for adenovirus (type unknown) had no underlying conditions but was <1 year of age. Of the 4 children who were negative for adenovirus (patients 5–8), all were considered previously healthy (Table 4; Figure; Appendix Table 1).

All children tested positive for >1 viral or bacterial pathogen (Table 5). After adenovirus, the most commonly detected pathogens were bacterial pathogens isolated in culture from normally sterile sites (blood or joint fluid, n = 4), followed by Clostridium difficile (stool specimens, n = 2), rhinovirus/enterovirus (respiratory specimens, n = 2), and respiratory syncytial virus (respiratory specimens, n = 2). In addition, 1 child had serologic evidence of acute Epstein-Barr virus infection. Of note, none of the children had evidence of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection; 2 children were reported to have had previous SARS-CoV-2 infection on the basis of serologic results in their medical records.

Liver specimens from 6 children underwent routine pathological examination at the clinical institution or medical examiner’s office; 3 children had FFPE liver tissue specimens submitted to CDC. In 3 children (patients 3, 6, and 8), FFPE liver tissue specimens were negative for adenovirus by IHC at the clinical institution. Of the 3 children for whom FFPE liver tissue specimens were submitted to CDC, 2 (patients 5 and 7) were negative for adenovirus by IHC and PCR at CDC. FFPE liver tissue from 1 child (patient 2) was positive by IHC and PCR at the clinical institution and CDC, and adenovirus species C was detected by PCR at CDC. In addition, adenovirus species C was detected in whole blood and respiratory samples (Table 4). In the same child (patient 2), liver tissue pathology was consistent with classic adenovirus hepatitis including smudge cells. Pathologic findings seen in liver varied in the other 5 children (e.g., acute hepatitis, massive necrosis, interface hepatitis).

Outcomes

The median duration of hospitalization was 14 days (range <1–18 days). Seven (87.5%) children had acute liver failure as noted on the medical abstraction form; 2 of those underwent liver transplantation during acute hospitalization (Table 3; Figure). Seven children had a death certificate or autopsy report available that described the cause of death, including liver-related causes (viral hepatitis, acute cholestatic hepatitis, acute liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy, acute liver transplant rejection), cardiopulmonary causes (acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiopulmonary arrest), cerebral herniation, or multiorgan failure. Among the 4 children who tested positive for adenovirus, 3 had adenovirus noted in the death certificate or autopsy report. Adenovirus was not mentioned on the death certificate for the fourth adenovirus-positive child (patient 3), who tested positive only after receiving a liver transplant.

Discussion

The deaths reported during the national investigation of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology represent a group of young children with diverse medical histories and courses of illness, likely reflecting the medical and etiologic complexity of pediatric hepatitis and the broad case criteria used for the US investigation. Multiple children tested positive for adenovirus and other pathogens. Adenovirus typing data was available for 2 adenovirus-positive children. Of the 4 children who tested positive for adenovirus, most had underlying medical conditions at the time of adenovirus detection that likely put them at greater risk for severe infection and death. The death of 1 previously healthy child with adenoviremia demonstrates the continued importance of adenovirus testing and investigating the potential association between adenovirus and hepatitis in healthy children.

The United States is one of the few countries to report fatalities associated with pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology (2), which may reflect minor differences in the case definitions implemented by countries (16,17), variation in application of those definitions for case finding, or the large size of the US population, enabling identification of rare outcomes. Of note, more than half of the initially reported fatalities in young children with hepatitis were later determined not to meet the case definition, most commonly because an etiology for their hepatitis was ultimately identified.

The diversity and complexities of illness among the children precluded identification of many commonalities; however, we were able to group the children into 3 broad categories. The first category describes a rare but recognized relationship between adenovirus infection and hepatitis: severe hepatitis or acute liver failure in an immunocompromised patient. Three of the 4 children who tested positive for adenovirus fall into this category because they were immunocompromised from immunosuppressive treatment or immunodeficiency at the time of adenovirus detection. The second category of children, of which 4 children were identified in this investigation, encompasses those who were previously healthy and tested negative for adenovirus. Hepatitis among those children may have a wide range of possible etiologies. As previously mentioned, pediatric acute liver failure can have several potential etiologies (4); earlier studies estimate that 30%–50% may be of undetermined cause (7,12). The findings among the fatally ill children reported here and previous studies on pediatric acute liver failure underscore the importance of standardized and comprehensive testing to identify underlying etiologies in children with indeterminate acute liver failure.

The third category encompasses the 1 previously healthy child in this study whose hepatitis appeared to be related to adenovirus, as evidenced by adenoviremia. Although age (<1 year) may be considered a potential risk factor, the child had no known underlying medical conditions or immunodeficiency that would predispose to severe illness or complications from adenovirus infection. Detection of rhinovirus/enterovirus in a respiratory sample was the only other notable laboratory finding. The child had neither an acute nor prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. No liver tissue was available for analysis; the relationship between adenovirus infection and liver injury, if any, remains unclear. However, the presence of adenoviremia in conjunction with hepatitis of unknown etiology in this child bears similarity to the original cluster of children in Alabama (1) and to other case reports described elsewhere (18). The findings from this child and previous literature (811) emphasize the importance of considering adenovirus in the differential diagnosis for pediatric acute hepatitis, despite uncertainty regarding the pathologic mechanism.

The children described in this article are a unique subset of the overall patient population identified in the investigation of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology. Similar to members of the overall patient population, the fatally ill children illustrate a diverse range of possible hepatitis etiologies. The fatally ill children were more likely to have underlying conditions and differed in adenovirus testing results (13). Underlying conditions were rare (6%) in the overall patient population, whereas 2 of the 8 fatally ill children had significant underlying medical conditions that increased their risk for hepatitis. Several adenoviruses were detected among the overall patient population, including species B (type 7), C (types 1, 2, 6), and F (types 40, 41). Although adenovirus type 41 is a main focus in the national-level investigation and the most commonly detected type among the nonfatal cases (20/30, 67%), it was not detected in the 2 adenovirus-positive fatal cases that had typing results. Rather, those children were infected with adenovirus types typically seen in severe illness (species B, type 7) or upper respiratory illness (species C, type 1) and reported to be associated with hepatitis in immunocompromised patients (19,20). Typing was not available for the remaining 2 adenovirus-positive children; however, adenovirus was detected both in respiratory (nasopharyngeal swabs) and whole-blood specimens, suggesting possible infection with an adenovirus other than type 41. Adenovirus 41, which is typically associated with gastrointestinal infections (20,21), is rarely identified in respiratory specimens (22). Last, a high proportion of children in the overall patient population and the fatalities are Hispanic/Latino. Investigation into whether Hispanic/Latino children are at higher risk for diseases and death is needed.

The first limitation of this investigation is that we attempted to construct the clinical context of each child’s illness via a secondary analysis of available medical and laboratory data, but we did not have full access to comprehensive medical records. Limited record availability, complexity and heterogeneity in illness course, and differences in clinical evaluations (e.g., laboratory testing) complicated summarization and full comparison of hepatitis cases. Although we detected multiple pathogens among the children, determining their contribution to hepatitis or death was not possible. Similarly, interpreting the role of adenovirus in the clinical course of illness was constrained by variations in specimen type, timing, and frequency of adenovirus testing. Reports from a related, previously published investigation in Alabama (1) suggested differences in the sensitivity of detection by specimen type (highest sensitivity in whole blood) that could add further uncertainty to the interpretation of adenovirus testing results. However, all children were tested for the virus in multiple specimen types, often including blood. Although evaluation was not available at the time of this report, investigation is warranted into the potential role of adeno-associated virus type 2, a parvovirus hypothesized to have either a causal relationship or lead to more severe liver disease in co-infection with adenovirus (23,24). Last, we could not assess multiple potentially relevant host-related factors that may have affected the risk of illness, clinical course, or treatment, among them genetic or autoimmune predisposition (24), socioeconomic status, or behavioral factors (e.g., healthcare-seeking behavior).

The deaths reported during the US investigation of pediatric hepatitis of unknown etiology likely represent a diverse range of etiologies in both the cause of hepatitis and cause of death. This report describes 3 children who demonstrated a recognized relationship between adenovirus and acute hepatitis in immunocompromised persons; it also contributes to the growing evidence suggestive of a potential relationship between adenovirus and acute hepatitis in previously healthy children and the importance of testing for adenovirus early in the course of illness. Further investigation of adeno-associated virus type 2, adenovirus, and other potential helper viruses (e.g., human herpesvirus 6 and 7) (23) will contribute to understanding the mechanism of liver injury, if any, and the role of any cofactors or co-infections, particularly among a diverse population of children with no known underlying conditions. If adenovirus or other viral pathogens are contributing to the development of hepatitis, discovery of this relationship may enable clinicians to identify the cause of hepatitis in some future cases in which the etiology and appropriate treatment would have otherwise been unknown.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Bettina Bankamp, Julu Bhatnagar, Xiaoyan Lu, Roosecelis B. Martines, Jana M. Ritter, Jan Vinjé, Jennifer L. Cannon, Judy Chen, Tingting Gu-Templin, Page Keating, Ramona Lall, Joel Ackelsberg, Carmen J. Rodríguez Caquías, and Whitney Tillman.

Ms. Almendares is an epidemiologist within the Epidemiology Branch, Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Her research interests include vaccine-preventable diseases, respiratory virus epidemiology in children and community surveillance for health risks. Dr. Baker is an epidemiologist in the Viral Gastroenteritis Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Her research focus is global child health, vaccine-preventable diseases, and viral gastroenteritis.

Additional members of the Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology Group: Jordan Cates, Anita K. Kambhampati, Erin R. McKeever, Melissa M. Coughlin, Caelin Cubenas (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA); Neha Balachandran (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Cherokee Nation Assurance, Arlington, Virginia, USA); Ashley Gent, Dalton Dessi (Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, Florida, USA); Melissa Tobin-D’Angelo, Ami Gandhi (Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA); Nicole Stone (Indiana Department of Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA); Geoff Brousseau, Macey Ladisky (Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, Michigan, USA); Alexandra Berkley (Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, St. Louis, Missouri, USA); Matthew Donahue, Derek Julian ( Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA); Dominique Balan, Mike Antwi (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, New York, USA); Lauren Torso Orkis ( Pennsylvania Department of Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA); Melissa Marzán Rodríguez, Iris R Cardona Gerena (Puerto Rico Department of Health, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA); Chelsea Campbell (South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina, USA); Jessica Schultz (Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA); Jantel Lewis, Ryan Wallace (Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA); Thomas Haupt ( (Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).

Top

References

  1. Baker  JM, Buchfellner  M, Britt  W, Sanchez  V, Potter  JL, Ingram  LA, et al. Acute hepatitis and adenovirus infection among children—Alabama, October 2021‒February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:63840. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Disease outbreak news. Severe acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children—multi-country. 2022 [cited 2023 May 23]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON400
  3. CDC Health Alert Network. Recommendations for adenovirus testing and reporting of children with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology. 2022 [cited 2023 May 23]. https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2022/pdf/CDC_HAN_462.pdf
  4. Squires  JE, McKiernan  P, Squires  RH. Acute liver failure: an update. Clin Liver Dis. 2018;22:773805. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schaberg  KB, Kambham  N, Sibley  RK, Higgins  JPT. Adenovirus hepatitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:8109. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ronan  BA, Agrwal  N, Carey  EJ, De Petris  G, Kusne  S, Seville  MT, et al. Fulminant hepatitis due to human adenovirus. Infection. 2014;42:10511. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Squires  RH Jr, Shneider  BL, Bucuvalas  J, Alonso  E, Sokol  RJ, Narkewicz  MR, et al. Acute liver failure in children: the first 348 patients in the pediatric acute liver failure study group. J Pediatr. 2006;148:6528. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ozbay Hoşnut  F, Canan  O, Ozçay  F, Bilezikçi  B. Adenovirus infection as possible cause of acute liver failure in a healthy child: a case report. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2008;19:2813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Munoz  FM, Piedra  PA, Demmler  GJ. Disseminated adenovirus disease in immunocompromised and immunocompetent children. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:1194200. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Matoq  A, Salahuddin  A. Acute hepatitis and pancytopenia in healthy infant with adenovirus. Case Rep Pediatr. 2016;2016:8648190. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rocholl  C, Gerber  K, Daly  J, Pavia  AT, Byington  CL. Adenoviral infections in children: the impact of rapid diagnosis. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e516. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Narkewicz  MR, Horslen  S, Hardison  RM, Shneider  BL, Rodriguez-Baez  N, Alonso  EM, et al.; Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group. A learning collaborative approach increases specificity of diagnosis of acute liver failure in pediatric patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:18011810.e3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cates  J, Baker  JM, Almendares  O, Balachandran  N, McKeever  ER, Kambhampati  AK, et al.; Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology Group. Paediatric acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology: a national surveillance investigation in the USA during 2021 and 2022. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7:77385. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. UK Health Security Agency. Investigation into acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children in England: Technical briefing 4. 2022 Jul 26 [cited 2023 Mar 1]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1094573/acute-hepatitis-technical-briefing-4.pdf
  15. Lu  X, Erdman  DD. Molecular typing of human adenoviruses by PCR and sequencing of a partial region of the hexon gene. Arch Virol. 2006;151:1587602. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for adenovirus testing and reporting of children with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology. 2022 Apr 21 [cited 2022 Apr 21]. https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2022/pdf/CDC_HAN_462.pdf
  17. Zhang  LY, Huang  LS, Yue  YH, Fawaz  R, Lim  JK, Fan  JG. Acute hepatitis of unknown origin in children: early observations from the 2022 outbreak. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022;10:52230. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. UK Health Security Agency. Investigation into acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children in England. Technical briefing 3. 2022 May 19 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1077027/acute-hepatitis-technical-briefing_3.pdf
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adenoviruses. Outbreaks [cited 2023 Mar 21]. https://www.cdc.gov/adenovirus/outbreaks.html
  20. Lynch  JP III, Kajon  AE. Adenovirus: epidemiology, global spread of novel serotypes, and advances in treatment and prevention. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;37:586602. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bányai  K, Estes  MK, Martella  V, Parashar  UD. Viral gastroenteritis. Lancet. 2018;392:17586. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Echavarria  M, Maldonado  D, Elbert  G, Videla  C, Rappaport  R, Carballal  G. Use of PCR to demonstrate presence of adenovirus species B, C, or F as well as coinfection with two adenovirus species in children with flu-like symptoms. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:6257. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Servellita  V, Sotomayor Gonzalez  A, Lamson  DM, Foresythe  A, Huh  HJ, Bazinet  AL, et al.; Pediatric Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology Working Group. Adeno-associated virus type 2 in US children with acute severe hepatitis. Nature. 2023;617:57480. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ho  A, Orton  R, Tayler  R, Asamaphan  P, Herder  V, Davis  C, et al.; DIAMONDS Consortium; ISARIC4C Investigators. Adeno-associated virus 2 infection in children with non-A-E hepatitis. Nature. 2023;617:55563. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: 
Deaths Associated with Pediatric Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology, United States, October 2021–June 2023
CME Questions
  • Which of the following statements regarding the outbreak of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology between 2021 and 2023 is most accurate?

    • > 4000 children were affected in the United States by 2023

    • > 30,000 children were affected globally by 2022

    • The main pathogen identified in the outbreak has been adenovirus species F, type 41

    • Before the outbreak, < 15% of cases of pediatric acute liver failure were found to be idiopathic

  • In the current study, which of the following statements regarding the demographics and past medical history of children who died after a diagnosis of acute hepatitis is most accurate?

    • All cases were concentrated in the southern United States

    • The median age of cases was 7 months

    • The majority of cases were among Hispanic or Latino children

    • 75% of cases had a history of immunocompromise

  • Which of the following statements regarding the clinical characteristics of children included in the current study is most accurate?

    • Three-quarters of cases had respiratory symptoms

    • The median duration of symptoms before presentation at the hospital was 2 days

    • The median alanine aminotransferase level at presentation was approximately 400 U/L

    • The median international normalized ratio level at presentation was normal

  • What was the rate of positive polymerase chain reaction testing for adenovirus in the hospital among children included in the current study?

    • 25%

    • 50%

    • 75%

    • 100%

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3004.231140

Original Publication Date: March 19, 2024

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

2Members of the group are listed at the end of this article.

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 4—April 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Olivia Almendares, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 12, 2024
Page updated: March 19, 2024
Page reviewed: March 19, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external