Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 6, Number 1—February 2000

Norwalk-Like Calicivirus Genes in Farm Animals

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Wim H.M. van der Poel*Comments to Author , Jan Vinjé*, Reina van der Heide*, Maria-Inmaculada Herrera†, Amparo Vivo†, and Marion P.G. Koopmans*
Author affiliations: *National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; †Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Cite This Article


Viruses closely related to Norwalk-like viruses (NLVs) were recently found in stored stool samples from two calves (United Kingdom and Germany) and four pigs (Japan), sparking discussions about the potential for zoonotic transmission. To investigate if NLVs are commonly present in farm animals, pooled stool samples from 100 pig farms, 48 chicken farms, 43 dairy cow herds, and 75 veal calf farms from the Netherlands were assayed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction amplification, using primers specific for the detection of NLVs from humans. NLV RNA was detected in 33 (44%) of the specimens from veal calf farms and two (2%) specimens from pig farms. Our data show that NLV infections—until recently thought to be restricted to humans—occur often in calves and sometimes in pigs. While zoonotic transmission has not been proven, these findings suggest that calves and pigs may be reservoir hosts of NLVs.

Caliciviruses infect animals and humans (1). Within the family Caliciviridae, four genera have been distinguished: vesivirus, lagovirus, Norwalk-like viruses (NLV), and Sapporo-like viruses (SLV) (2). The genera vesivirus and lagovirus contain a broad range of animal caliciviruses, but viruses in the NLV and SLV genera until recently have been found only in humans. In recent years NLVs, also known as small round-structured viruses, have emerged as a common cause of infectious gastroenteritis in all age groups and the main cause of outbreaks of gastroenteritis in restaurants and institutions such as nursing homes and hospitals (3-5).

Genetically, the human caliciviruses separate into at least three genetic clusters, called genogroups (GG), i.e., GGI and GGII NLV and the GGIII SLV (6). Each of these genogroups comprises genomically and antigenically diverse strains (7,8). This high degree of diversity results in at least 13 distinct genotypes for the NLVs (3,5,8-10). Many types of NLV cocirculate in the general population, causing sporadic cases and outbreaks. However, occasionally epidemics occur in which most outbreaks are caused by a single genotype (e.g., Lordsdale-like virus in the Netherlands in 1996) (5,11). Hypotheses for the mechanisms behind the emergence of epidemic types range from large-scale foodborne transmission of a single strain to introduction from a nonhuman reservoir. An indication for the latter was a recent report from Japan of the finding of NLV-like sequences in stool specimens from pigs (12). Enteric caliciviruses have also been detected in other animal species (calves, dogs, and chickens) (13-16). However, except for canine calicivirus (17), these viruses lack definitive sequence evidence linking them to the Caliciviridae (18). Molecular characterization of three calicivirus strains from cattle has recently been reported. The first virus (Tillamook virus; BCV-Bos1), described by Neill et al. (19), caused respiratory symptoms and was phylogenetically related to San Miguel sea lion virus and vesicular exanthema of swine virus, both within the genus vesivirus. Viruses in this genus have a broader host range (20). Two other viruses closely related to GGI NLVs (Jena virus 117/80 and Newbury agent type 2) were detected in feces from newborn calves with diarrhea (21,22). The similarity of the porcine and bovine sequences with those of NLVs found in humans suggests that a reservoir for these human pathogens may exist in farm animals.

We studied enteric caliciviruses in recently collected fecal samples from cattle, chicken, and swine in the Netherlands by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays specific for NLVs found in humans. In addition, we analyzed (by sequence analysis) the genetic variation of detected calicivirus strains and compared it with that of prototype GGI and GGII NLV strains.

Materials and Methods

Fecal Specimens

Stool specimens from animals were collected at farms in the Netherlands as part of ongoing surveillance for potential zoonotic microorganisms associated with gastroenteritis in humans. From October 10, 1998, to April 21, 1999, samples were collected from 3- to 9-month-old fattening pigs at 100 pig farms of 22 to 1600 pigs. From January 1 to April 1, 1998, stool samples were collected from 75 veal calf farms of 38 to 930 calves and 43 dairy cattle herds of 25 to 180 cows. The age of the calves was 1 to 52 weeks (average 12 weeks), and of dairy cattle herds 4 to 6 years. From January 6 to April 21, 1998, samples were collected from < 6-week-old chickens at 48 broiler farms, with 5,000 to 70,000 per farm.


The sampling strategy allowed monitoring for pathogens in a large number of animals and detection of microorganisms at farm level with a prevalence of 5% and 95% confidence (23). Fecal samples from calves, pigs, and chickens (20 to 60 per farm) were collected from animals housed in one randomly chosen farm building. Dairy cattle of one farm were regarded as a single herd, and stool samples were collected from randomly selected cows. Until tested, fecal samples were stored at -70°C in 15 g/L of Trypton Soya broth (TSB) (Oxoid CM 129) and 10% glycerol.

Molecular Detection of NLVs by RT-PCR

For extraction of viral RNA, stool samples were resuspended in HBBS Hanks (Gibco BRL, Breda, Netherlands) to a final concentration of approximately 10%. These suspensions were centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 20 minutes, and 100 µl was used for RNA extraction by addition of a high-molarity solution of guanidinium isothiocyanate (GuSCN). Bound RNA was washed and eluted as previously described (24).

To reduce the risk for contamination, specimens from different species were analyzed separately, and one negative control sample was included for every two stool specimens. A human stool sample positive for NLV by electron microscopy was included as positive control.

We used a single-round reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay with a broadly reactive primer pair, which had been developed for the detection of NLVs in stool specimens from humans (5). For RT, 5 µl RNA was mixed with 4 µl 50 pmol JV13 primer. The solution was heated to 94°C for 2 minutes, cooled, and 6 µl RT buffer was added. The RT reaction was performed in a final volume of 15 µl, consisting of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM each of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), and 5 units of avian myeloblastoma virus RT (Boehringer Mannheim, Almere, Netherlands). The mixture was incubated for 1 hour at 42°C, heated for 5 minutes at 94°C to denature the enzyme, and then cooled. Five µl of the RT mixture was added to the PCR mix, containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.2), 75 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 2.5 units AmpliTaq (Perkin Elmer, Nieuwerkerk a/d IJssel, Netherlands), and 15 pmol primer JV12. Mineral oil was added, and 40 amplification cycles, 1 minute at 94°C, 1.5 minute at 37°C, and 1 minute at 74°C each, were performed. The amplification products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with UV after ethidium bromide staining.

For Southern blots, the RT-PCR products in the agarose gel were denatured by incubating in 0.5 M NaOH for 30 minutes and transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer, Almere, Netherlands) by vacuum blotting (Millipore, Etten-Leur, Netherlands). Hybridization of NLV RT-PCR products was performed as described previously (5).

Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

The NLV RT-PCR products of expected size (326 bp) and 21 products of smaller size of the calf herd samples were excised from a 2% agarose gel and purified with a Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Purified RT-PCR products were sequenced with the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) by using PCR primers. Nucleotide sequences were edited by using SeqEd (V1.03, Applied Biosystems), aligned by Geneworks (V2.5, Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA), and imported into the Treecon software package (25). The confidence values of the internal nodes were calculated by performing 100 bootstrap analyses. Evolutionary trees for nucleotide sequences were drawn by using the Neighbor-joining method.

Electron Microscopy

Electron microscopy was performed as recommended by Flewett (26) and Doane and Anderson (27), with model Philips 400T (Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands) at 80 kV. Identification of virus particles was based on morphologic criteria, i.e., the size and characteristic surface morphology (28).


Figure 1

Thumbnail of Results of ethidium bromide staining (panel A) and corresponding Southern hybridization (panels B and C) of RT-PCR products of eight calf herd (CH) samples (A) M= molecular mass marker, lane 1: CH124; lane 2: CH125; lane 3: water; lane 4: CH126; lane 5: CH138; lane 6: water; lane 7: CH139; lane 8: CH145; lane 9: water; lane 10: CH156; lane 11: CH176; lane 12: water; lane 13: human NLV positive control (5); lane 14: water. For Southern blot hybridizations, a set of probes used to det

Figure 1. Results of ethidium bromide staining (panel A) and corresponding Southern hybridization (panels B and C) of RT-PCR products of eight calf herd (CH) samples (A) M= molecular mass marker, lane 1:...

Twenty-five (33%) of 75 veal calf farm samples and 2 (2.0%) of 100 pig farm samples showed visible products of the expected size (326 bp). The gel electrophoresis and hybridization results are shown for eight strains (Figure 1). Hybridization with a set of probes used for detection of NLVs in humans yielded no positive reactions (Figure 1B); therefore, 46 products (25 of the expected size and 21 of a smaller size [Figure 1A, lane 7]) were sequenced. All 25 RT-PCR products of the expected size contained the GLPSG amino acid motif characteristic of viral RNA polymerases (29). The 21 products of smaller size revealed no viral sequences. The NLV-RT-PCR was negative for all pooled specimens from 43 dairy herds and 48 chicken farms.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic relationships among human and animal NLVs clustering in genogroup (GG) I and II, based on a 145-bp nucleotide sequence within RNA polymerase gene. Dendrogram includes 14 calf herd (CH) sequences from the bovine NET/98 cluster (CH138, CH156, CH131, CH168, CH182, CH176 [Bo/NLV/176/1998/NET], CH163, CH188, CH169, CH161, CH126, CH140, CH170, and CH178 described in this study), and sequences from Norwalk virus (NV), Mexico virus (MX), Newbury agent (NA), Jena virus (JV), Sw/

Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among human and animal NLVs clustering in genogroup (GG) I and II, based on a 145-bp nucleotide sequence within RNA polymerase gene. Dendrogram includes 14 calf herd (CH) sequences...

By phylogenetic analysis, all calf calicivirus sequences formed a tight cluster closely related to NLVs from GGI with the highest similarity with the Newbury calf calicivirus (Figure 2) (22). Nucleotide sequence identities between the calf NLVs and GGI NLVs were 63% to 70% (75% to 77% amino acids). The swine virus sequences clustered as a separate lineage within GGII NLVs, with 69% to 71% nucleotide and 79% to 83% amino acid identity. In addition, the swine sequences strongly resemble (94% nucleotides, 100% amino acids) the swine calicivirus sequences from Japan. Partial polymerase sequences of Bo/NLV/176/1998/NET and Sw/NLV/34/1998/NET have been assigned GenBank accession numbers AF194183 and AF194184, respectively.

Since the calf and pig strains did not hybridize to the probe mixture for detection of NLVs from humans, specific probes were developed based on the consensus sequence of RT-PCR products of 10 calf herd samples and on the pig farm samples, respectively. The probe sequences were: RH1(calf) (5'-GGATGTGGTGCAGGCAA AC-3') and RH2(pig) (5'-TCCGCATCTCTATCGT GG-3'). Hybridizations with the calf probe (RH1) confirmed all RT-PCR-positive calf samples after 15 minutes exposure to an ECL hyperfilm (Figure 1C). Overnight exposure to ECL hyperfilm revealed eight more positives, for 33 (44%) positive calf farm samples.

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Electron microscopy showing NLV particles in a calf herd sample (CH176), negatively stained with 2% K-PTA, pH 7.0. Bar = 50nm.

Figure 3. Electron microscopy showing NLV particles in a calf herd sample (CH176), negatively stained with 2% K-PTA, pH 7.0. Bar = 50nm.

All veal calf farm samples were screened by electron microscopy for viruses (Table). Particles with NLV morphologic features were found in only one specimen (Figure 3), in which the presence of calicivirus sequence was confirmed by RT-PCR and hybridization (Table).


Until recently, humans were considered the sole host of NLVs. Recent studies in Japan and the United Kingdom, however, demonstrated calicivirus sequences in the caecum of pigs and in stored calf stool samples containing calicivirus-like particles by electron microscopy (12,21,22). Molecular characterization of calf enteric caliciviruses, named Newbury agent (22) and Jena virus (21), revealed that they were genetically related and more closely associated with GGI NLVs than with any other known calicivirus. In this study, we detected NLV nucleotide sequences in 33 (44%) of 75 of the pooled samples from veal calf farms.

Phylogenetic analysis of the detected sequences showed that they formed a tight cluster with the Newbury sequence (22) and were closely related to NLVs from GGI. Bridger et al. (30) demonstrated that calves can be infected with Newbury calicivirus. The detection of Newbury-like NLVs in pooled veal calf samples of 33 farms from different regions suggests that the species is a normal NLV host. Similarly, the close genetic relationship between calicivirus sequences detected in the pig samples in our study and those from Japan suggests that these viruses commonly infect pigs. The close similarity of porcine and bovine sequences to the NLVs infecting humans indicates the possibility of an animal reservoir for human infection. However, these findings by no means prove zoonotic transmission. Genetically related viruses are commonly found in different species without resulting in apparent widespread interspecies transmission (e.g., rotavirus). On the other hand, zoonotic transmission cannot be excluded. The genetic distances between the animal and human NLVs are similar to the distances between the GGI and GGII strains, and epidemic spread of some NLV strains (5) led to the widespreadpossibly globalemergence of a single predominant strain in the human population in 1995-96 (11). This epidemiologic observation resembles early descriptions of the vesicular exanthema of swine virus (VESV) epidemics (31). These viruses, belonging to another genus within the Caliciviridae, the vesiviruses, are known for their broad host range (20). The occasional epidemic spread of VESV was later linked to introduction of caliciviruses from an ocean reservoir (20). Therefore, interspecies transmission of NLVs is possible; the occasional widespread NLV epidemics caused by a single strain may result from introductions of new NLV strains from an animal reservoir.

Reynolds et al. reported electron microscopy detection of caliciviruses in calf diarrhea outbreaks (32), and the bovine caliciviruses Newbury agent (22) and Jena virus (21) were pathogenic for calves under experimental conditions and in field studies (33). In our study, we did not record disease or death on the surveyed farms and therefore cannot determine whether these caliciviruses were associated with disease. Despite repeated attempts, experimental infection of different animal species with the prototype Norwalk virus has not been successful, with the exception of infection in chimpanzees (3). Our findings may lead to the development of an animal model for the NLVs of humans; for example, a pig model would enable studies of (mucosal) immunity following NLV infection (1).

The low prevalence of Norwalk-like calicivirus in swine farms (2 per 100) is in agreement with the findings reported from Japan (12). Electron microscopy confirmed the calicivirus origin of the detected NLV sequences in only one calf sample. This low number of positives by electron microscopy was not surprising, given the greater sensitivity of RT-PCR and the use of pooled specimens for screening. NLVs in humans typically are shed at relatively low levels.

The absence of NLV sequences in all 43 dairy herd specimens may be explained by use of an inappropriate primer pair, which was optimized for detection of NLVs of humans (4) or by an acquired strain-specific immunity in older animals that prevents repeated infections. A third possibility is that levels of shedding in adult animals are very low, precluding virus detection in pooled specimens. The swine farm samples were all from fattening pigs at least 3 months old. We may have found a higher prevalence in recently weaned pigs, as the prevalence of other enteric pathogens is highest in young piglets (34).

Our findings raise important questions about the host range of NLVs. It is unclear if animal NLVs form genetically distinct stable lineages or are part of a common pool of viruses circulating between animals and humans. If calves or swine indeed are reservoirs, the prevalence of calicivirus should be determined in both healthy and diseased cattle and swine and methods to detect such interspecies transmissions at an early stage should be developed, in collaborative research by public health and veterinary sciences.

Dr. van der Poel is a veterinary virologist in the Microbiological Laboratory for Health Protection, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands. His research involves viral zoonoses and foodborne virus infections.



We thank A.W. van de Giessen and ing. W.D.C. Deisz for volunteering fecal specimens from the monitoring study for zoonotic enteric pathogens, and A.M. Henken and A.M. de Roda Husman for critically reading the manuscript.

This research was financially supported and approved by the Dutch Inspectorate for Health Protection, Commodities and Veterinary Public Health.



  1. Kapikian  AZ, Estes  MK, Chanock  M. Norwalk group of viruses. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, Channock RM, Melnick JL, Monath TP, et al., editors. Fields virology. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 783-810.
  2. Pringle  CR. Virus taxonomy—San Diego 1998. Arch Virol 143:1449-59.
  3. Green  KY. The role of human caliciviruses in epidemic gastroenteritis. Arch Virol Suppl. 1997;13:15365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Vinjé  J, Koopmans  MPG. Molecular detection and epidemiology of small round structured viruses in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the Netherlands. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:6105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vinjé  J, Altena  SA, Koopmans  MPG. The incidence and genetic variability of small round-structured viruses in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the Netherlands. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:13748. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Matson  DO, Zhong  WM, Nakata  S, Numata  K, Jiang  X, Pickering  LK, Molecular characterization of a human calicivirus with sequence relationships closer to animal caliciviruses. J Med Virol. 1995;45:21522. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ando  T, Mulders  MN, Lewis  DC, Estes  MK, Monroe  SS, Glass  RI. Comparison of the polymerase region of small round-structured virus strains previously classified in three serotypes by solid-phase immune electron microscopy. Arch Virol. 1994;135:21726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang  X, Cubitt  WD, Berke  T, Zhong  W, Dai  X, Nakata  S, Sapporo-like human caliciviruses are genetically and antigenically diverse. Arch Virol. 1997;142:181327. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Green  J, Vinjé  J, Gallimore  C, Koopmans  MPG, Hale  A, Brown  D. Capsid protein diversity among Norwalk-like caliciviruses In press 2000.
  10. Vinjé  J, Deijl  H, van de Heide  R, Lewis  D, Hedlund  K-O, Svensson  L, Molecular detection and epidemiology of Sapporo-like viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. In press.
  11. Noel  JS, Fankhauser  RL, Ando  T, Monroe  SS, Glass  RI. Identification of a distinct common strain of Norwalk-like viruses having a global distribution. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:133444. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sugieda  M, Nagaoka  H, Kakishima  Y, Ohshita  T, Nakamura  S, Nakajima  S. Detection of Norwalk-like virus genes in the caecum contents of pigs. Arch Virol. 1998;143:121521. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Granzow  H, Schirmeier  H. Identification of 32 nm viruses in faeces of diarrhoeic calves by electron microscopy. Monatsh Veterinarmed. 1985;40:2289.
  14. Herbst  W, Lange  H, Krauss  H. Elektronenmikroskopischer Nachweis von calicivirus-ähnlichen Partikeln im Kot durchfallkranker Kälber. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1987;94:381440.
  15. Mochizuki  M, Kawanishi  A, Sakamoto  S, Tashiro  S, Fujimoto  R, Ohwaki  M. A calicivirus isolated from a dog with fatal diarrhoea. Vet Rec. 1993;132:2212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reckling  KF. Use of electron microscopy for observation of small round viruses in faecal samples collected from calves and animals with diarrhoea. Monatsh Veterinarmed. 1987;42:2725.
  17. Hashimoto  M, Rierink  F, Tohya  Y, Mochizuki  M. Genetic analysis of the RNA polymerase gene of caliciviruses from dogs and cats. J Vet Med Sci. 1999;61:6038. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cubitt  D, Bradley  MJ, Carter  S, Chiba  S, Estes  MK, Saif  LJ, Viral taxonomy, classification and nomenclature; sixth report of the committee on the taxonomy of viruses. Arch Virol Suppl 1997;ESVV 77-82, Reading, United Kingdom.
  19. Neill  JD, Meyer  RF, Seal  BS. Genetic relatedness of the caliciviruses: San Miguel sea lion and vesicular exanthema of swine viruses constitute a single genotype within the Caliciviridae. J Virol. 1995;69:44848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith  AW, Skilling  DE, Cherry  N, Mead  JH, Matson  DO. Calicivirus emergence from ocean reservoirs: zoonotic and interspecies movements. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:1320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu  BL, Lambden  PR, Gunther  H, Otto  P, Elscher  M, Clarke  IN. Molecular characterization of a bovine enteric calicivirus: relationship to the Norwalk-like viruses. J Virol. 1999;73:81925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dastjerdi  AM, Green  J, Gallimore  CI, Brown  DWG, Bridger  J. The bovine newbury agent-2 is genetically more closely related to human SRSVs than to animal caliciviruses. Virology. 1999;254:15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Giessen van de AW. Frankena K, Leeuwen van WJ, Notermans SHW. An approach for monitoring salmonella serotypes in farm animals. Proceedings of the Symposium "Salmonella and salmonellosis." Ploufragan 1992:375-85.
  24. Boom  R, Sol  CJA, Salimans  MMM, Jansen  CL. Wertheim-van Dillen, van der Noordaa J. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:495503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van der Peer  Y, De Wachter  R. TREECON for windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994;10:56970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Flewett  TH. Electron microscopy in the diagnosis of infectious diarrhea. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1978;173:53843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Doane  FW, Anderson  N. Pretreatment of clinical specimens and viral isolates. In: Electron microscopy in diagnostic virology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. p. 4-10.
  28. Caul  EO, Appleton  H. The electron microscopical and physical characteristics of small round human fecal viruses: an interim scheme for classification. J Med Virol. 1982;9:25765. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bruenn  JA. Relationships among the positive strand and double-strand RNA viruses as viewed through their RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;25:21726. DOIGoogle Scholar
  30. Bridger  JC, Hall  GA, Brown  JF. Characterization of a calici-like virus (Newbury agent) found in association with astrovirus in bovine diarrhea. Infect Immun. 1984;43:1338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith  AW, Akers  TG. Vesicular exanthema of swine. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1976;169:7003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds  DJ, Morgan  JH, Chanter  N, Jones  PW, Bridger  JC, Debney  TG, Microbiology of calf diarrhoea in southern Britain. Vet Rec. 1986;119:349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Günther  H, Otto  P, Heilman  P. Studies into diarrhoea of young calves. Sixth communication: detection and determination of pathogenicity of a bovine corona virus and an undefined icosahedric virus. Archiven Experimenteller Veterinärmedizin (Leipzeig). 1984;38:78192.
  34. Will  LA, Paul  PS, Proescholdt  TA, Aktar  SN, Flaming  KP, Janke  BH, Evaluation of rotavirus infection and diarrhea in Iowa commercial pigs based on epidemiologic study of a population represented by diagnostic laboratory cases. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1994;6:41622.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0601.000106

Table of Contents – Volume 6, Number 1—February 2000

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Wim H.M. van der Poel, Microbiological Laboratory for Health Protection, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands; fax: 31-30-274-4434

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: May 09, 2011
Page updated: May 09, 2011
Page reviewed: May 09, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.