Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 6, Number 5—October 2000

Medical Examiners, Coroners, and Bioterrorism

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Federal, state, and local agencies are developing plans to detect and respond to bioterrorism. Medical examiners and coroners should be included in these plans. A multifaceted response team for bioterrorist events includes health-care providers and law enforcement, public health, and public safety officials. Since medical examiners and coroners generally work independently from other members of this team, special efforts may be necessary to ensure their inclusion in the planning process.

Medical examiners and coroners have state statutory authority to investigate violent, suspicious, sudden, or unexplained deaths (1), including those due to homicide, trauma, and inapparent or poorly explained causes, such as drugs, toxins, and infectious agents. The role of these medical professionals in bioterrorism response can be twofold: response to a known terrorist attack and surveillance for unusual deaths or clusters of deaths that may represent an undetected attack. Deaths from terrorism are homicides and therefore under the jurisdiction of medical examiners and coroners. These investigators are skilled in preserving medicolegal evidence that may be important for subsequent criminal proceedings and in handling situations that involve mass deaths, as shown by their participation in the investigations of the Oklahoma City bombing, aviation accidents, and heat-related deaths (2-4).

Medical examiners and coroners may also play an important role in the detection of bioterrorism since they may recognize unusual deaths before health-care providers become involved. Patients who die of infectious diseases or poisoning often die at home (5,6). Even patients who come to a health-care facility for treatment may die precipitously and unexpectedly, without a clear diagnosis, and may come under the jurisdiction of medical examiners and coroners. For example, in the 1993 outbreak of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in the southwestern United States, medical examiners played an important role in recognizing the novel, rapidly fatal infectious syndrome (7). Autopsies are an effective way of obtaining an accurate diagnosis for deaths from infectious diseases and toxic exposures. In 1979, autopsy pathologists played a critical role in recognizing inhalational anthrax cases caused by an accidental discharge from a former Soviet bioweapons laboratory (8). In 1985, Illinois medical examiners identified the cause of death of persons who ingested acetaminophen that had been intentionally contaminated with cyanide (9).

To be fully integrated into the medical, law enforcement, and public health plans for detecting and responding to bioterrorism, medical examiners and coroners will need information about the biological and chemical agents likely to be used, access to laboratories capable of identifying these agents, adequate data management systems for mortality surveillance, and improved autopsy facilities and procedures to ensure that prosectors are protected from infectious and chemical agents. As a beginning, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently funded a model medical examiner surveillance program for bioterrorism mortality in New Mexico. Further collaboration among federal, state, and local agencies and medicolegal death investigators will be required for the components of such a program to be effective on a national scale.


Kurt B. Nolte*†, Stephen S. Yoon†, and Carol Pertowski†
Author affiliations: *University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA



  1. Combs  DL, Parrish  RG, Ing  R. Death investigation in the United States and Canada, 1995. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1995.
  2. Jordan  FB. The role of the medical examiner in mass casualty situations with special reference to the Alfred P. Murrah Building bombing. J Okla State Med Assoc. 1999;92:15963.PubMed
  3. McCarty  VO, Sohn  AP, Ritzlin  RS, Gauthier  JH. Scene investigation, identification, and victim examination following the accident of Galaxy 203: disaster preplanning does work. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32:9837.PubMed
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Heat-related mortality--Chicago, July 1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:5779.PubMed
  5. Soslow  AR, Woolf  AD. Reliability of data sources for poisoning deaths in Massachusetts. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10:1247. DOIPubMed
  6. Luke  JL, Halpern  M. Sudden unexpected death from natural causes in young adults. Arch Pathol. 1968;85:1077.PubMed
  7. Nolte  KB, Simpson  GL, Parrish  RG. Emerging infectious agents and the forensic pathologist: the New Mexico model. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;120:1258.PubMed
  8. Walker  DH, Yampolska  O, Grinberg  LM. Death at Sverdlovsk: what have we learned? Am J Pathol. 1994;144:113541.PubMed
  9. Lifschultz  BD, Donoghue  ER. The Tylenol cyanide poisonings. American Academy of Forensic Sciences 1989;46(Abstract A12).


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0605.000522

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 6, Number 5—October 2000

Page created: December 17, 2010
Page updated: December 17, 2010
Page reviewed: December 17, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.