Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 8, Number 9—September 2002

Public Health Impact of Reemergence of Rabies, New York

Hwa-Gan H. Chang*Comments to Author , Millicent Eidson*†, Candace Noonan-Toly*, Charles V. Trimarchi*, Robert Rudd*, Barbara J. Wallace*†, Perry F. Smith*†, and Dale L. Morse*†
Author affiliations: *New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA; †School of Public Health, University at Albany, Albany, New York, USA;

Main Article

Table 3

Number of humans receiving postexposure treatment, by animal status and type of exposure, New York, 1993–1998

Type of exposure No. (%) of humans receiving PET a
Rabid animal Suspect rabid animalb Nonrabid animalc Total
Bite 538 (.8) 5,503 (47.6) 328 (60.0) 6,369 (34.9)
Scratch 224 (3.6) 773 (6.7) 56 (10.2) 1,053 (5.8)
Contact with saliva 5,090 (82.9) 2,891 (25.0) 131 (23.9) 8,112 (44.5)
Unknown exposure 287 (4.8) 2,385 (20.6) 32 (5.9) 2,704 (14.8)
Total 6,139 (10) 11,552 (100) 547 (100) 18,238 (100)

aPET, postexposure treatment.
bPETs due to exposure to animals not submitted for rabies testing or specimen was not testable because of specimen condition.
cPETs due to exposure to animals that tested negative for rabies.

Main Article

Page created: July 16, 2010
Page updated: July 16, 2010
Page reviewed: July 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.