Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 7—July 2011

Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome, United States, 1993–2009

Adam MacNeilComments to Author , Thomas G. Ksiazek, and Pierre E. Rollin
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (A. MacNeil, T.G. Ksiazek, P.E. Rollin); and University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA (T.G. Ksiazek)

Main Article

Table 2

HPS case-patients by geographic region, United States, 1993–2009*

Region States† Hantavirus species present in region No. case-patients who died/ total no. case-patients
(CFR, %)‡
Southwest Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah Sin Nombre virus 92/273 (34)
Northwest Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, Wyoming Sin Nombre virus 35/101 (35)
Midwest Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin Sin Nombre virus, Bayou virus 33/84 (39)
East Florida, Maryland, North Carolina, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia New York virus, Monongahela virus, Black Creek Canal virus 5/12 (43)

*HPS, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome; CFR, case-fatality rate.
†Only states with >1 probable rodent exposure–related HPS case are shown.
‡There were no significant differences in case-fatality rates between geographic regions (p = 0.773 by χ2 test).

Main Article

Page created: August 15, 2011
Page updated: August 15, 2011
Page reviewed: August 15, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.