Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 5—May 2014

Responses to Threat of Influenza A(H7N9) and Support for Live Poultry Markets, Hong Kong, 2013

Peng Wu, Vicky J. Fang, Qiuyan Liao, Diane M.W. Ng, Joseph T. Wu, Gabriel M. Leung, Richard Fielding, and Benjamin J. CowlingComments to Author 
Author affiliations: School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Main Article

Table 2

Factors affecting behavioral response to influenza A(H7N9) and support for permanent closure of LPMs in Hong Kong, 2013*

Characteristic Odds ratio (95% CI)
Avoided visiting LPMs in previous 7 d because of influenza A(H7N9) Would support permanent closure of LPMs
M Reference Reference
1.07 (0.75–1.53)
1.22 (0.92–1.63)
Age, y
18–34 Reference Reference
35–54 0.89 (0.55–1.46) 2.28 (1.53–3.40)
0.81 (0.48–1.36)
2.87 (1.86–4.45)
Educational attainment
Primary or below Reference Reference
Secondary 1.63 (0.92–2.89) 1.76 (1.17–2.65)
University or above
1.65 (0.88–3.09)
2.99 (1.88–4.76)
Visited LPM >1 time in previous year
No Reference Reference
1.15 (0.78–1.68)
0.60 (0.44–0.83)
Median State Trait Anxiety score (5)
<1.7 Reference Reference
1.03 (0.72–1.46)
0.95 (0.72–1.25)
Self-perceived risk for infection with influenza A(H7N9)†
Low 0.68 (0.42–1.11) 0.95 (0.64–1.42)
Evens Reference Reference
0.95 (0.49–1.84)
1.51 (0.87–2.63)
Self-perceived risk for infection with influenza A(H7N9) compared with other persons‡
Low 1.22 (0.74–1.99) 0.93 (0.62–1.38)
Evens Reference Reference
1.97 (0.51–7.61)
0.52 (0.13–1.98)
Symptom-induced worry§
Less 1.01 (0.62–1.64) 0.87 (0.61–1.24)
As usual Reference Reference
2.00 (1.34–2.98)
1.08 (0.78–1.48)
Perceived severity compared with seasonal influenza¶
Less 1.22 (0.53–2.79) 1.01 (0.59–1.73)
Same Reference Reference
2.31 (1.33–3.99)
1.28 (0.87–1.87)
Perceived severity compared with SARS¶
Less 0.84 (0.52–1.36) 0.89 (0.61–1.29)
Same Reference Reference
0.91 (0.48–1.73)
0.88 (0.52–1.48)
Perceived severity compared with influenza A(H5N1)¶
Less 1.29 (0.73–2.26) 0.76 (0.49–1.17)
Same Reference Reference
More 1.06 (0.70–1.60) 0.93 (0.66–1.31)

*Odds ratios adjusted for all variables shown. LPMs, live poultry markets; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.
†Respondents were asked, “How likely do you think it is that you will contract H7N9 avian flu over the next 1 month?” Low indicates the answers Never/Very unlikely/Unlikely; evens, the answer Same (50% probability); and high, the answers Likely/Very likely/Certain.
‡Respondents were asked, “What do you think are your chances of getting H7N9 avian flu over the next 1 month compared to other people outside your family of a similar age?” Low indicates the answers Not at all/Much less/Less; evens, the answer Same (50% probability); and high, the answers Likely/Very likely/Certain or More/Much more/Certain.
§Respondents were asked, “If you were to develop flu-like symptoms tomorrow, would you be…” followed by several choices. Low indicates the answers Not worried at all/Much less worried than normal/Worried less than normal; as usual, the answer About same; and more, the answers Worried more than normal/Worried much more than normal/Extremely worried.
¶Respondents were asked, “How is the severity of infection with H7N9 avian influenza compared to seasonal influenza, SARS, or H5N1 avian influenza?” Lower indicates the answers A little lower/Much lower; same, the answer Same; and higher, the answers Much higher/A little higher.

Main Article

  1. Li  Q, Zhou  L, Zhou  M, Chen  Z, Li  F, Wu  H, Epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in China. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:52032. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cowling  BJ, Jin  L, Lau  EH, Liao  Q, Wu  P, Jiang  H, Comparative epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A H7N9 and H5N1 viruses in China: a population-based study of laboratory-confirmed cases. Lancet. 2013;382:12937. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yu  H, Wu  JT, Cowling  BJ, Liao  Q, Fang  VJ, Zhou  S, Effect of closure of live poultry markets on poultry-to-person transmission of avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an ecological study. Lancet. 2014;383:5418. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Uyeki  TM, Cox  NJ. Global concerns regarding novel influenza A (H7N9) virus infections. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:18624. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Leung  GM, Ho  L-M, Chan  SK, Ho  S-Y, Bacon-Shone  J, Choy  RY, Longitudinal assessment of community psychobehavioral responses during and after the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:171320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowling  BJ, Ng  DM, Ip  DK, Liao  Q, Lam  WW, Wu  JT, Community psychological and behavioral responses through the first wave of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in Hong Kong. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:86776. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Liao  Q, Cowling  BJ, Lam  WT, Fielding  R. Changing perception of avian influenza risk, Hong Kong, 2006–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:237980. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kish  L. A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44:3807. DOIGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowling  BJ, Freeman  G, Wong  JY, Wu  P, Liao  Q, Lau  EH, Preliminary inferences on the age-specific seriousness of human disease caused by avian influenza A(H7N9) infections in China, March to April 2013. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Liao  Q, Lam  WT, Leung  GM, Jiang  C, Fielding  R. Live poultry exposure, Guangzhou, China, 2006. Epidemics. 2009;1:20712. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Liao  Q, Lam  WW, Jiang  CQ, Ho  EY, Liu  YM, Zhang  WS, Avian influenza risk perception and live poultry purchase in Guangzhou, China, 2006. Risk Anal. 2009;29:41624. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health of the Government of Hong Kong. CHP’s response to media enquiries on notification from Guangdong HFPC. 2013 Dec 11 [cited 2013 Dec 16].
  13. Leung  YH, Lau  EH, Zhang  LJ, Guan  Y, Cowling  BJ, Peiris  JS. Avian influenza and ban on overnight poultry storage in live poultry markets, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:133941. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

Page created: April 17, 2014
Page updated: April 17, 2014
Page reviewed: April 17, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.