Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 8, Number 12—December 2002

Legionnaires’ Disease at a Dutch Flower Show: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Therapy

Kamilla D. Lettinga*Comments to Author , Annelies Verbon*, Gerrit-Jan Weverling*, Joop F.P. Schellekens†, Jeroen W. Den Boer†‡, Ed P.F. Yzerman§, Jacobus Prins¶, Wim G. Boersma#, Ruud J. van Ketel*, Jan M. Prins*, and Peter Speelman*
Author affiliations: *Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; †National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; ‡Municipal Health Service Zuid-Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands; §Regional Laboratory of Public Health Haarlem, Haarlem, the Netherlands; ¶Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, the Netherlands; #Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands;

Main Article

Table 2

Multivariate analysis of factors determining outcome

Prognostic factora Odds ratio (95% CI)b
(n=141) p value
Smoking 2.5 (1.1 to 5.6) 0.03
Dyspnea at presentation 2.1 (0.9 to 4.8) 0.09
Temperature >38.5°C 2.9 (1.0 to 8.6) 0.05
Plasma creatinine >100 µmol/L 2.0 (0.9 to 4.6) 0.11
Bilateral infiltrates 4.2 (1.7 to 10.3) 0.002
Pleural effusion 3.4 (0.99 to 11.6) 0.053

aPrognostic factors with p≤ 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered. Factors with p value >0.2 in the multivariate analysis were excluded.
bCI, confidence interval.

Main Article

Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.