Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011

Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Respiratory Tract Infections, Eastern Asia

Sami SimonsComments to Author , Jakko van Ingen, Po-Ren Hsueh, Nguyen Van Hung, P.N. Richard Dekhuijzen, Martin J. Boeree, and Dick van Soolingen
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (S. Simons, J. van Ingen, P.N.R. Dekhuijzen, M.J. Boeree); National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM),; Bilthoven, the Netherlands (J. van Ingen, D. van Soolingen); National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (P.-R. Hsueh); National Hospital of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Hanoi, Vietnam (N.V. Hung)

Cite This Article


To characterize the distribution of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species isolated from pulmonary samples from persons in Asia and their association with pulmonary infections, we reviewed the literature. Mycobacterium avium complex bacteria were most frequently isolated (13%–81%) and were the most common cause of pulmonary NTM disease (43%–81%). Also pathogenic were rapidly growing mycobacteria (M. chelonae, M. fortuitum, M. abscessus). Among all NTM isolated from pulmonary samples, 31% (582/1,744) were considered clinically relevant according to American Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria. Most patients were male (79%) and had a history of tuberculosis (37%). In Asia, high prevalence of rapidly growing mycobacteria and a history of tuberculosis are distinct characteristics of pulmonary NTM disease. This geographic variation is not well reflected in the American Thoracic Society criteria for NTM infections and could be incorporated in future guidelines.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are common in the environment and have been isolated worldwide (1). They are increasingly recognized as pathogens in humans. Pulmonary disease is the most common manifestation (2) and is thought to result from aerosol inhalation. Because of their omnipresence in the environment, isolation of NTM from the respiratory tract does not, per se, indicate NTM disease. Therefore, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) has established diagnostic criteria to help distinguish between contamination and true NTM disease (1).

Although NTM are present worldwide, much of the literature on pulmonary NTM disease comes from industrialized countries, mainly Europe, North America, and Japan. Differences in the NTM species distribution in clinical samples and disease have been noted among these regions (3); by extrapolation, these characteristics in other parts of the world probably differ as well.

Asia has a long history of NTM research, both clinical and fundamental. Tsukamura et al. have reported on pulmonary NTM infections in Japan dating back to the early 1970s (4). Yet because many studies were not reported in English, knowledge of the distribution of NTM species in Asia is limited. However, these data will enhance our understanding of NTM diversity between and within species and their association with NTM disease in humans. For this reason, we searched the literature on clinical NTM isolation and disease from different regions in Asia and compared our findings with previously published data from other regions.

Literature Search

From March 2009 to December 2009, we searched PubMed ( for English-language articles about nontuberculous mycobacteria in Asia. The search strategy was as follows: “mycobacteria, atypical” [MeSH] AND “Asia” [MeSH] OR “atypical mycobacterium infections” [MeSH] AND “Asia” [MeSH]. We chose the term Asia to incorporate the following countries: Brunei, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Mongolia, and Taiwan.

We found 256 citations. If we considered the abstract to be relevant, we obtained a full copy of the article; we contacted authors if full-text articles could not be retrieved. Furthermore, the reference sections were screened for other eligible citations. We considered 67 articles to be relevant, of which 37 were excluded for the following reasons: 11 were case reports, 7 referred to disseminated NTM infections, 6 were not in English (5 in Japanese, 1 in Chinese), 6 did not concern pulmonary NTM, 4 were reviews, and 3 represented neither epidemiologic data nor clinical cases. From the remaining 30 articles (433), the following data were abstracted for this review: country, research setting, NTM species, clinical features of the patients, and radiographic data. All articles were screened to determine whether ATS diagnostic criteria for the determination of clinical relevance of NTM isolations applied (1). Cases consistent with the ATS diagnostic criteria were considered clinically relevant.

Search Results

We identified 30 English-language articles about the epidemiology and clinical relevance of NTM isolates in Asia (433). We found data from China (5), Hong Kong (6), India (713), Japan (4,1420), South Korea (2124), Singapore (25), Taiwan (2629), and Thailand (3033). Most articles used a combination of methods to identify NTM species. Biochemical and phenotypic analysis (n = 11) were used most frequently, followed by molecular tools (n = 4) or a combination of both (n = 5). From 10 articles, the exact methods of species identification could not be determined. The use of identification methods differed over time; biochemical and phenotypic analyses were mostly used during 1966–1990 (6 of 7 studies), whereas use of molecular tools increased during 1990–2009 (Table 1). The number of different species isolated did not differ between the 2 periods. However, most species identification by biochemical testing depended heavily on 1 study from India (11).


Figure 1

Thumbnail of Five most prevalent nontuberculous mycobacteria species found in respiratory specimens, regardless of clinical relevance, Asia, 1971–2007. Data from (4–13,17–22,25–33).

Figure 1. Five most prevalent nontuberculous mycobacteria species found in respiratory specimens, regardless of clinical relevance, Asia, 1971–2007. Data from (413,1722,2533)....

Regardless of clinical relevance, 25 articles reported on NTM isolates from pulmonary samples (Figure 1) (413,1722,2533). In general, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) was most frequently (67%) isolated, although it predominated in northeastern Asia (South Korea and Japan). Exact species identification of MAC (now M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. chimaera, M. colombiense, M. vulneris, M. marseillense, M. bouchedurhonense, and M. timonense) (34,35) was not performed, thereby hampering a more detailed analysis.

Rapidly growing mycobacteria ([RGM] M. fortuitum complex, M. abscessus, M. chelonae) were frequently identified in pulmonary samples from Taiwan, China, and Singapore (5,2529). The overall isolation of RGM in this part of Asia was 16%, making RGM the second most frequently isolated species in this region. Other species frequently encountered were M. kansasii (4%) and M. gordonae (3.5%). M. malmoense, a species regularly encountered in northwestern Europe, was found only 9 times in a single study of 1,000 NTM isolates from India (11). Also, M. xenopi, which is frequently encountered in Canada and England (3), was isolated only 10 times (of 11,987 isolates) and mainly during studies from India (7,11,13,21,27).

Clinical Relevance

The clinical relevance of pulmonary NTM isolates (Table 2) was mentioned in 10 articles covering a total of 1,744 patients (6,16,21,23,25,2830,32,33). No articles covered the clinical relevance of NTM in China. Different criteria were used to define clinical relevance, but all criteria comprised a combination of clinical, bacteriologic, and radiographic criteria. Only 4 studies reported a priori use of ATS criteria (1). According to ATS criteria, for 31% (582/1,744) of patients, pulmonary NTM isolates were considered clinically relevant. Relevance varied widely across regions and studies. For example, a study of patients in an intensive care unit in Taiwan found that only 9% of NTM isolates were clinically relevant (28); however, in a study of HIV-infected patients in Thailand, relevance rose to 76% (30).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Five most common nontuberculous mycobacteria species causing pulmonary infections, Asia, 1971–2007. Data from (4,6,10,13,17,19,21,25,27–33).

Figure 2. Five most common nontuberculous mycobacteria species causing pulmonary infections, Asia, 1971–2007. Data from (4,6,10,13,17,19,21,25,

Figure 2 shows the distribution of mycobacterial species among patients with definite pulmonary NTM disease in Asia, according to ATS criteria. MAC was the most frequently reported (68% of all cases) cause of NTM disease; RGM were second (14% of all cases). Prevalence of RGM pulmonary infections ranged from 2.6% (Japan) to 44% (South Korea). M. malmoense and M. xenopi were not reported as causative species in any of these studies in Asia.

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Clinical relevance of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) isolates, Asia, 1971–2007. Relevance per species was defined as percentage of patients with pulmonary NTM isolates meeting the American Thoracic Society criteria. Species reported infrequently, i.e., <5×, are not shown. Data from (6,16,17,21,23,25,29,32,33).

Figure 3. Clinical relevance of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) isolates, Asia, 1971–2007. Relevance per species was defined as percentage of patients with pulmonary NTM isolates meeting the American Thoracic Society criteria. Species reported...

We found some discrepancies between isolation frequency (Figure 1) and clinical relevance (Figure 2). For example, in Hong Kong M. gordonae was found in 19% of pulmonary isolates regardless of clinical relevance but in only 4% of cases of pulmonary NTM infection. In contrast, in India, higher prevalence of M. szulgai was found (1% in all pulmonary samples vs. 7% of all causes of pulmonary NTM). We therefore investigated the clinical relevance of the various NTM species separately, measuring clinical relevance per species by the percentage of patients meeting ATS criteria (Figure 3). Most clinically relevant species were MAC (56%), followed by M. abscessus (35%) and M. chelonae (31%). M. fortuitum, M. gordonae, and M. terrae were infrequently reported (1%–3%) as clinically relevant. The varying clinical relevance per species might partially explain the differences between Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Clinical Signs and Radiographic Features

We found information on clinical signs for 689 patients and radiographic data for 1,044 patients (10,12,1416,20,21,2325,2730,33). Most patients with pulmonary NTM infections were male (543/689). Because of incomplete data, mean age could not be calculated; 8 studies reported mean ages of 50–70 years. Other characteristics are shown in Table 3. One third of patients had a history of tuberculosis (TB) (252/689). HIV co-infection was less prevalent among patients with localized pulmonary NTM infections (15/280). Clinical signs of NTM disease mimicked those typical of TB: most frequently chronic cough (255/268), followed by hemoptysis (82/268), fever (47/268), and weight loss (40/268). Radiographically, most patients had structural lung disease; 39% (405/1,044) had cavitations and 44% (461/1,044) had bronchiectasis.


NTM isolation and disease in Asia have several features. First, a substantial percentage (31%) of patients from whom pulmonary NTM were isolated had clinically relevant NTM disease. This finding is similar to the 33% and 25% found in studies in Canada and the Netherlands, respectively (2,3). In Asia, NTM may cause substantial pulmonary disease; differences in clinical relevance exist among species (Figure 3), as previously observed (2).

Second, MAC was the main cause of pulmonary NTM infection (68% of cases) in Asia. In a key article in 2002, Marras and Daley reviewed the prevalence of pulmonary NTM disease in the world (3). They noted a predominance of MAC among the causative agents of pulmonary NTM disease in Asia. Data from Asia were, however, scarce, and their conclusion was mainly based on 1 study (6). Our study supports their conclusion of the predominance of MAC in Asia, which is consistent with its predominance in other parts of the world, namely, North America and most parts of Europe (3).

Third, we found that in some regions in Asia, RGM are a major cause of pulmonary NTM disease. This finding contrasts with studies of NTM in other parts of the world (3). In a surveillance study from the Netherlands for instance, RGM caused only 3% of all pulmonary NTM infections (2). In the United States, this percentage is ≈5% (36). In the present review, RGM was found to generally cause 14% of pulmonary NTM infections, but in 3 countries (India, Taiwan, South Korea) this percentage rose to >30% of infections. The fact that RGM were frequently found in pulmonary samples (Figure 1) could reflect higher environmental exposure of RGM in Asia and, hence, higher isolation frequency. The predominance of RGM species may be the result of laboratory practices as well. Ethnic factors may also contribute to susceptibility to different species; i.e., Asian persons could be more susceptible to RGM infection.

Contrary to the high frequency of isolation of RGM species, M. malmoense and M. xenopi, frequently seen in other parts of the world, were not seen as causative species in any of the studies from Asia. M. xenopi has been associated with hot water systems (1); as a result, it might be expected to be more rare in Asia, where the water delivery infrastructure is less developed than that in Europe and North America.

A fourth feature of pulmonary NTM disease in Asia—compared with Europe and North America—was the relatively high percentage of patients with a history of TB. This finding might merely reflect the higher incidence of TB in Asia, or it could reflect higher clinician awareness in Asia, such that physicians order Mycobacterium spp. cultures in former TB patients with coughing and hence find a relatively higher number of NTM isolates. Alternatively, it could reflect a true predilection of NTM for patients with structural lung disease (1) associated with a higher susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in general. The role of TB in the pathogenesis of pulmonary NTM disease is controversial; structural lung damage by a TB infection renders the host vulnerable to NTM disease (1), but there are also clues that exposure to TB infers cross-protection to NTM disease (37).

Our study has some limitations. The major limitation is the language restriction. The inclusion of languages other than English would probably have increased precision. For instance, during our literature search we came across 5 articles, published as abstracts in PubMed, on NTM infections in Japan. Although certain aspects of these data were already published in the English-language articles we included, we did not have the means to include these non–English-language studies. Nevertheless, our study illustrates the distribution of NTM infections from different geographic areas in Asia and will increase knowledge of the distribution and relevance of NTM species in Asia.

Another limitation is the long time span of the included studies. Because they ranged from 1969 to 2008, they used different decontamination, culture, and identification methods. Data should therefore be considered with caution because of the variety of laboratory procedures used by the several authors to isolate and identify NTM. First, different sample decontamination protocols may determine the yield of NTM by selecting for certain NTM species and inhibiting others (38). Second, the introduction of more sensitive liquid media probably increased NTM isolation and perhaps selected for specific species (26). Finally, and foremost, the major differences in identification methods used in the studies introduce important biases. Because the taxonomy of NTM has been changing in recent years (37,39,40), the different NTM identification methods used in the various studies might have influenced our results; use of molecular tools to identify the historical isolates would probably result in different, more detailed, identifications, especially among the MAC, the M. simiae group, and the RGM (37,39,40). We did note increased use of molecular tools for NTM identification over time (Table 1), which will, over the next few years, provide us with a more up-to-date overview of NTM species distribution in Asia.

In conclusion, despite the limitations of language and species identification methods, we have described the scale of human pulmonary NTM infections in eastern Asia. MAC bacteria were not only the most prevalent NTM found in pulmonary samples, but they were also the most common cause of pulmonary NTM disease in this geographic region. Distinct epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of pulmonary NTM disease in Asia were found: many patients had a history of TB, and RGM were a frequent cause of pulmonary NTM infections. These distinct characteristics of pulmonary NTM disease in this part of the world are not well reflected in the current ATS criteria on NTM infections and could be incorporated in future guidelines.

Dr Simons is a resident in pulmonary medicine at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre. His primary research interest focuses on resistance mechanisms in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.



  1. Griffith  DE, Aksamit  T, Brown-Elliot  BA, Catanzaro  A, Daley  C, Gordin  F, An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. van Ingen  J, Bendien  SA, de Lange  WC, Hoefsloot  W, Dekhuijzen  PN, Boeree  MJ, Clinical relevance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated in the Nijmegen-Arnhem region, the Netherlands. Thorax. 2009;64:5026. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Marras  TK, Daley  C. Epidemiology of human pulmonary infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23:55367. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tsukamura  M, Shimoide  H, Kita  N, Kawakami  K, Ito  T, Nakajima  N, Epidemiologic studies of lung disease due to mycobacteria other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Japan. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:9971007. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Weimin  L, Guanglu  J, Zhihui  L, Huakan  H, Liquan  C, Miao  T, Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in China. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39:13841. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosker  HSR, Lam  CW, Ng  TK, Ma  HK, Chan  SL. The prevalence and clinical significance of pulmonary infection due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Hong Kong. Respir Med. 1995;89:38. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Agarwal  SK, Jamil  Z, Srivasta  VK, Rathi  AK, Mehrotra  L. A clinico-bacteriological assessment of pulmonary tuberculosis patients with reference to drug resistance pattern in treated and untreated cases. Indian J Med Sci. 1980;34:3946.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Choudri  DS, Dube  MK, Purohit  SD, Dube  S. The prevalence of anonymous mycobacteria in both resistant as well as fresh cases of pulmonary tuberculosis in the local population of south east Rajasthan. [PMID: 114478]. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1979;22:16575.
  9. Jesudason  MV, Gladstone  P. Non tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from clinical specimens at a tertiary care hospital in south India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005;23:1725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karak  K, Bhattacharyya  S, Majumdar  S, De  PK. Pulmonary infection caused by mycobacteria other than M. tuberculosis in and around Calcutta. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1996;39:1314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paramasivan  CN, Govindan  D, Prabhakar  R, Somasundaram  PR, Subbammal  S, Tripathy  SP. Species level identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria from south Indian BCG trial area during 1981. Tubercle. 1985;66:915. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramakrishnan  CV. Pulmonary disease due to atypical mycobacteria: a retrospective study from south India. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:10902. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shanker  SVR, Jain  NK, Chandrasekhar  S, Singh  MM. Prevalence of atypical mycobacteria in sputum of patients undergoing treatment at a tuberculosis clinic. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1989;31:913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kobashi  Y, Matsushima  T. Comparison of clinical features in patients with pulmonary Mycobacterium-avium complex (MAC) disease treated before and after proposal for guidelines. J Infect Chemother. 2004;10:2530. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kobashi  Y, Matsushima  T. The microbiological and clinical effects of combined therapy according to guidelines on the treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease in Japan—including a follow-up study. Respiration. 2007;74:394400. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Okumura  M, Iwai  K, Ogata  H, Ueyama  M, Kubota  M, Aoki  M, Clinical factors on cavitary and nodular bronchiectatic types in pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease. Intern Med. 2008;47:146572. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Saito  H, Watanabe  T, Akamatsu  S, Yamamoto  Y, Irikura  T, Kubonishi  K, Incidence of atypical mycobacteria and pulmonary mycobacterioses in national sanatoria in the Chugoku-Shikoku area. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 1979;28:1615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rapid increase of the incidence of lung disease due to Mycobacterium kansasii in Japan. Chest. 1983;83:8902. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsukamura  M, Kita  N, Shimoide  H, Arakawa  H, Kuze  A. Studies on the epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteriosis in Japan. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:12804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yamamoto  M. Pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium szulgai in Japan. Intern Med. 2000;39:2779. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koh  WJ, Kwon  OJ, Jeon  K, Kim  TS, Lee  KS, Park  YK, Clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens in Korea. Chest. 2006;129:3418. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryoo  SW, Shin  S, Shim  MS, Park  YS, Lew  WJ, Park  SN, Spread of nontuberculous mycobacteria from 1992 to 2006 in Koreans. J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22:41520. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yim  JJ, Park  YK, Lew  WJ, Bai  GH, Han  SK, Shim  YS. Mycobacterium kansasii pulmonary disease in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20:95760. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yim  JJ, Kim  HJ, Kwon  OJ, Koh  WJ. Association between microsatellite polymorphisms in intron II of the human Toll-like receptor 2 gene and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in a Korean population. Hum Immunol. 2008;69:5726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Teo  SK, Lo  KL. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease of the lungs in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 1992;33:4646.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Chien  HP, Yu  MC. WU MH, Lin TP, Luh KT. Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 with Löwenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000;4:86670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ding  LW, Lai  CC, Lee  LN, Hsueh  PR. Disease caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria in a university hospital in Taiwan, 1997–2003. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:10607. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shih  JY, Hsueh  PR, Lee  LN, Wang  HC, Yang  PC, Kuo  SH, Nontuberculous mycobacteria isolates: clinical significance and disease spectrum. J Formos Med Assoc. 1997;96:6217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shu  CC, Lee  CH, Wang  JY, Jerng  JS, Yu  CJ, Hsueh  PR, Nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary infection in medical intensive care unit: the incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significance. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:2194201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ratanasuwan  W, Techasathit  W, Chuenarom  V, Suwanagool  S, Anekthananont  T, Jearanaisilavong  J, Infection due to nontuberculous Mycobacterium other than MAC in AIDS patients at Siriraj Hospital during 1998–2000: saphophyte vs pathogen. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85:88693.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Saritsiri  S, Udomsantisook  N, Suankratay  C. Nontuberculous infections in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89:203546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sriyabhaya  N, Wongwatana  S. Pulmonary infection caused by atypical mycobacteria: a report of 24 cases in Thailand. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:10859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wongwatana  S, Sriyabhaya  N. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection of the lung in a chest hospital in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 1992;75:110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. van Ingen  J, Boeree  MJ, Kösters  K, Wieland  A, Tortoli  E, Dekhuijzen  PN, Proposal to elevate Mycobacterium avium complex ITS sequevar MAC-Q to Mycobacterium vulneris sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:227782. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ben Salah  I, Cayrou  C, Raoult  D, Drancourt  M. Mycobacterium marseillense sp. nov., Mycobacterium timonense sp. nov., and Mycobacterium bouchedurhonense sp. nov., members of the Mycobacterium avium complex. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:28038. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Brien  RJ, Geiter  LJ, Snider  D. The epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseased in the United States. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;135:100714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Trnka  L, Dankova  D, Svandova  E. Six years’ experience with the discontinuation of BCG vaccination: 4. Protective effect of BCG vaccination against the Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex. [ PMID: 7841428]. Tuber Lung Dis. 1994;75:34852. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Buijtels  PC, Petit  PL. Comparison of NaOH-n-acetyl cysteine and sulfuric acid decontamination methods for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;62:838. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Adékambi  T, Colson  P, Drancourt  M. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5699708. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tortoli  E. Impact of genotypic studies on mycobacterial taxonomy: the new mycobacteria of the 1990s. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:31954. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1703.100604

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors:

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 25, 2011
Page updated: July 25, 2011
Page reviewed: July 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.