Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020
Research

Large Nationwide Outbreak of Invasive Listeriosis Associated with Blood Sausage, Germany, 2018–2019

Author affiliations: Robert Koch Institute, Wernigerode, Germany (S. Halbedel, M.A. Fischer, A. Flieger); Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany (H. Wilking, A. Holzer, R. Lachmann, A. Krings, M. Meincke, K. Stark); German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin (S. Kleta, S. Lüth, S.A. Dahouk); Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin (S. Lüth); Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria (A. Pietzka, S. Huhulescu, W. Ruppitsch, F. Allerberger); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden (A. Krings, M. Meincke); Institut Pasteur, Paris, France (A. Leclercq); Ministry for Environment, Agriculture, Conservation and Consumer Protection of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Düsseldorf, Germany (R. Kamphausen); State Health Office Baden-Wuerttemberg, Stuttgart, Germany (M. Meincke, C. Wagner-Wiening); Chemical and Veterinary Investigations Office, Fellbach, Germany (M. Contzen); Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany (I.B. Kraemer); Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen, Germany (S.A. Dahouk)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Invasive listeriosis is a severe foodborne infection in humans and is difficult to control. Listeriosis incidence is increasing worldwide, but some countries have implemented molecular surveillance programs to improve recognition and management of listeriosis outbreaks. In Germany, routine whole-genome sequencing, core genome multilocus sequence typing, and single nucleotide polymorphism calling are used for subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from listeriosis cases and suspected foods. During 2018–2019, an unusually large cluster of L. monocytogenes isolates was identified, including 134 highly clonal, benzalkonium-resistant sequence type 6 isolates collected from 112 notified listeriosis cases. The outbreak was one of the largest reported in Europe during the past 25 years. Epidemiologic investigations identified blood sausage contaminated with L. monocytogenes highly related to clinical isolates; withdrawal of the product from the market ended the outbreak. We describe how epidemiologic investigations and complementary molecular typing of food isolates helped identify the outbreak vehicle.

Listeriosis is a severe, mainly foodborne, human infection associated with higher case-fatality and hospitalization rates than other bacterial gastrointestinal pathogens (1). The causative agent, Listeria monocytogenes, occurs ubiquitously in the environment and disseminates into the food production chain. Patients develop either self-limiting noninvasive gastroenteritis or invasive listeriosis (2,3). Listeriosis adversely affects older and immunocompromised persons, as well as pregnant women, causing a severe invasive form of the disease that leads to sepsis, meningitis, and encephalitis, as well as neonatal infections and miscarriage (4). Case-fatality rates of invasive listeriosis are ≈30% for neurolisteriosis and even higher in septic patients (5). In Europe and North America, invasive listeriosis affects 0.3–0.6 persons/100,000 population/year (6,7).

L. monocytogenes forms hard-to-remove biofilms in food-processing plants, can acquire tolerance to sanitizers, and multiplies even at temperatures used for refrigeration (8). These properties complicate efficient prevention of L. monocytogenes contaminations in different types of ready-to-eat products, including dairy, meat, and fish, and in fruits and vegetables, all of which have been vehicles for listeriosis outbreaks in the past (912).

Outbreaks of listeriosis are difficult to control for several reasons. First, case numbers are low, impairing the generation of valid hypotheses about possible food sources through patient interviews. Second, incubation time can be long, 1–67 days (13), and patients often are seriously ill, further complicating patient interviews. Third, the large variety of possible food sources makes pinpointing through patient interviews and follow-up tracing of food difficult. Moreover, listeriosis outbreaks can be geographically widespread due to long-distance food trade connections, e-commerce, and travel, thus hampering outbreak recognition by local authorities (10,14,15). In addition, listeriosis outbreaks can be protracted and last for several years (16), making it difficult to correctly identify affected patient groups and the common source of infection.

Nationwide systematic collection of L. monocytogenes isolates from human listeriosis cases and subtyping by using high-resolution whole-genome sequencing (WGS)–based typing techniques can aid in rapid and reliable detection of outbreak clusters (3,1722), some of which were not detectable in the past. At the same time, systematic and on-demand typing of food-associated L. monocytogenes isolates assist in detecting outbreak sources. In a recent molecular surveillance study in France, one third of all isolates were grouped into WGS clusters, and most clusters contained <5 isolates (20). Larger outbreaks of invasive listeriosis occur, although infrequently, and 2 of the world’s largest outbreaks in the recent past included 147 cases in a multistate outbreak associated with cantaloupes in the United States in 2011 (10) and 1,060 cases in an outbreak associated with French polony sausage in South Africa during 2017–2018 (11). Since August 2019, Spain has been experiencing another large listeriosis outbreak (23), but the scientific evaluation of this outbreak is ongoing.

We describe an exceptionally large nationwide outbreak that included 134 laboratory-confirmed L. monocytogenes isolates from 112 patients with epidemiologic investigations and complementary WGS-based typing of food isolates identifying the outbreak vehicle. This outbreak represents one of the largest outbreaks of invasive listeriosis in Europe documented in the scientific literature during the past 25 years.

Methods and Materials

Isolation, Growth, and Serotyping of L. monocytogenes

We isolated L. monocytogenes from 184 specimens from human cases and food sources (Appendix Table 1). We performed routine L. monocytogenes cultures in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, or on BHI or sheep blood agar plates at 37°C. We detected and enumerated L. monocytogenes from food samples according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) methods EN ISO 11290–1:2017 and EN ISO 11290–2:2017 (24,25). We confirmed the species by using EN ISO 11290–1:2017 or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and a previously described multiplex PCR (26). We used the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (SigmaAldrich, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com) or the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com) to isolate chromosomal DNA and determined molecular serogroups by using multiplex PCR (27).

Genome Sequencing, Multilocus Sequence Typing, and Core Genome MLST

We quantified DNA by using the Qubit dsDNA BR or HS Assay Kit and Qubit fluorometers (Invitrogen, https://www.thermofisher.com). We prepared libraries by using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com) and sequenced isolates on MiSeq, HiSeq, or NextSeq sequencers (Illumina). We trimmed and assembled raw reads in SeqSphere (Ridom, https://www.ridom.de) by using the Velvet assembler. We extracted in silico serogroups, multilocus sequence types (STs), and 1,701 locus core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) complex types (CTs) by using SeqSphere and automated allele submission to the L. monocytogenes cgMLST server (http://www.cgmlst.org/ncs/schema/690488) (28). We deposited genome sequences in the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena; accession numbers in Appendix Table 1). Coverage ranged between 22- and 116-fold (median 54-fold). We defined cgMLST clusters as groups of isolates with <10 different alleles between neighboring isolates. We used SeqSphere in the pairwise ignore missing values mode and an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean to generate phylogenetic trees.

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism–Based Alignments

We used pipelines developed in-house to map sequencing reads, generate consensus sequences, calculate alignment, and filter single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using an exclusion distance of 300 bps (17). We used the 10-092876-0769 LM12 genome (GenBank accession no. CP019625) a member of serogroup IVb, ST6, and CT6304, as the reference. We generated maximum likelihood trees by using the Geneious 9.1.3 Tree Builder (https://www.geneious.com) and the randomized axelerated maximum likelihood plugin.

Virulome and Resistome Analyses and Susceptibility Testing

We included virulence and resistance genes of L. monocytogenes as target loci in SeqSphere task templates, as previously described (17,29). We extracted targets from assembled contigs by using SeqSphere and considered alleles present when identity was >90% and the query sequence aligned >99% with the reference sequence.

We performed antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing by using a microdilution assay in a 96-well plate format adapted from a study by Noll et al. (30). All susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines in Mueller Hinton fastidious (MH-F) broth (31).

We spread L. monocytogenes isolates on BHI agar plates and placed 6 mm cellulose discs loaded with 10 µL of a 10 mg/mL aqueous benzalkonium chloride solution on top of the agar plate. We incubated plates at 37°C overnight, then determined growth inhibition zone diameters. We used the Student t-test to assess statistical significance.

Case-Control Study

We defined outbreak cases as patients reported to public health authorities with disease onset during August 2018–June 2019 and isolation of L. monocytogenes from normally sterile body fluids and confirmation by cgMLST and SNP analysis. L. monocytogenes isolates were sent to the Robert Koch Institute (Wernigerode, Germany) and notification and typing data were merged for investigation. After the outbreak was identified, patients were interviewed by using a standardized questionnaire on food consumption during the 2 weeks before illness onset, general eating habits, and food purchasing behaviors. These data identified 40 food items for inclusion in the case-control study.

We collaborated with a survey institute to contact and interview case-controls. We frequency matched case-controls to case-patients for age, gender, and federal state of residence. We considered food items with p<0.05 consumed by >50% of participants for multivariable analysis. We used a stepwise-backward approach for model formation to consecutively exclude food items that were no longer significantly associated from the multivariable model until only significantly associated foods and their confounders remained. We determined risk measures, including odds, univariable, and multivariable ratios, in the statistical analysis.

Results

Molecular Surveillance

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Phylogenic tree constructed by using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and core genome multilocus sequence typing data of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from a large listeriosis outbreak, Germany. Green indicates clinical isolates of Epsilon1a subcluster; blue indicates food isolates of Epsilon1a subcluster; pink indicates isolates from the Epsilon1 cluster; violet indicates 2 complex type 4465 isolates not belonging to Epsilon1a from earlier listeriosis cases in Ju

Figure 1. Phylogenic tree constructed by using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and core genome multilocus sequence typing data of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from a large listeriosis outbreak, Germany. Green indicates...

The binational German–Austrian Consultant Laboratory for L. monocytogenes collects and sequences genomes of isolates from approximately two thirds of all mandatorily notified listeriosis cases in Germany; 699 cases were notified in 2018 and 593 in 2019. A phylogenetically diverse cluster, designated Epsilon1, was identified by using cgMLST. Epsilon1 included 46 PCR serogroup IVb isolates belonging to ST6 and CT90, CT2981, CT3803, CT3805, CT3806, CT3921, CT4083, CT4465, CT6236, CT6331, CT7353, and CT7451, all of which had specific allelic profiles within a CT threshold of <10 different alleles (17,28). The Epsilon1 cluster included isolates collected from all over Germany during 2011–2019 with no apparent geographic concentration. Allelic distances between isolates varied from 0–25 (median 11). In autumn 2018, a sudden increase of CT4465 and CT7353 isolates belonging to the Epsilon1 cluster was detected. Furthermore, the number of listeriosis cases reported in calendar weeks 34–43, 46, 48, and 50 exceeded the median of the 5 previous years (Appendix Figure 1). To identify the outbreak clone among all incoming serogroup IVb isolates, we developed a clone-specific PCR (Appendix). Altogether, 134 clinical CT4465 and CT7353 isolates were collected during August 2018–April 2019. These isolates formed a remarkably homogenous cluster with 0–5 (median 0) different cgMLST alleles (Figure 1). In contrast, 2 CT4465 isolates collected earlier, in July 2017 and June 2018, differed in 9–15 alleles (Figure 1).

We mapped raw sequence reads of all Epsilon1 strains against the 10-092876-0769 LM12 genome, the most closely related complete genome available. SNP calling separated the Epsilon1 cluster into several subclusters, but all CT4465 and CT7353 isolates collected from August 2018 onwards formed a single cluster (Appendix Figure 2). This subcluster was named Epsilon1a, and SNP distances in this cluster ranged from 0–3 SNPs (median 0). The 2 earlier CT4465 isolates were separated from the Epsilon1a cluster by 6–10 SNPs difference (median 8). Thus, SNP calling supported detection of a cluster of closely related CT4465 and CT7353 strains. Of note, only 21–29 cgMLST alleles (median 26) and 8–12 SNPs (median 8) differed between the Epsilon1a clone and the outbreak strain from South Africa (11), CT5886 (Figure 1; Appendix Figure 2).

Case Cohort

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Spatial and temporal distribution of cases during a large listeriosis outbreak, Germany. A) Number of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from subcluster Epsilon1a received by the consulting laboratory per week during the outbreak. B) Geographic distribution of laboratory-confirmed Epsilon1a cases in Germany during the outbreak. CW, calendar week.

Figure 2. Spatial and temporal distribution of cases during a large listeriosis outbreak, Germany. A) Number of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from subcluster Epsilon1a received by the consulting laboratory per week during the outbreak....

We collected 134 isolates from 112 patients who met the case definition. Initial cases were reported in August 2018, and the outbreak peaked in September 2018 (Figure 2, panel A); the last notified case was in April 2019. Cases occurred in 11/16 federal states in Germany; most cases occurred in western and southern Germany (Figure 2, panel B). This outbreak and the assembled genome of 1 representative isolate (isolate no. 18-04540) were shared via the Epidemic Intelligence Information System platform of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control on October 23, 2018 (UI-516, https://www.ecdc.europa.eu). France, the only other country involved, reported an Epsilon1a listeriosis case in a patient who had traveled to and purchased food in Germany. Sequence data of isolate 18-04540 was submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena; accession no. SAMEA5041142). However, the closest related isolate available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) pathogen detection pipeline was a 2016 clinical isolate from the Netherlands with an SNP distance of 12, which is clearly above the SNP distances observed in the Epsilon1a cluster.

One (0.9%) case-patient was pregnant, but the gestational age and health outcome of her newborn were not reported. The remaining 111 case-patients were 53–98 (median 79) years of age; 66 (59%) were men, 45 (41%) were women. Seven (6.3%) case-patients died, 2 of whom had listeriosis as the primary cause of death. The age distribution was not noticeably different from other notified listeriosis outbreaks. Of the 134 Epsilon1a isolates, 99 were from blood samples, 13 from cerebrospinal fluid, and 1 each from lymph nodes, ascites, sputum, pleura, joints, abscesses, or a superficial wound (Appendix Table 1). The isolation source was not reported for the remaining 15 isolates.

Properties of the Outbreak Clone

Virulome analysis revealed the presence of Listeria pathogenicity island 1 (LIPI-1) in all Epsilon1a outbreak isolates and detected the complete listeriolysin S-encoding LIPI-3 in 64% (Appendix Figure 3). However, we did not detect LIPI-4, which encodes a putative phosphotransferase system associated with neurolisteriosis (32). Epsilon1a clones carried the same complement of internalin genes as other serogroup IVb strains (Appendix Figure 3).

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Tolerance of isolates of Listeria monocytogenes from subcluster Epsilon1a in Germany to benzalkonium chloride. Three representative isolates from human listeriosis clusters Epsilon1a, Epsilon1, and distinct listeriosis clusters Lambda2 (ST2, CT2402), Pi3 (ST217, CT5744), or Theta3 (ST249, CT4449) were tested for resistance to benzalkonium chloride by disc diffusion, along with 3 representative ST6 isolates, not belonging to Epsilon1. Epsilon1a and Epsilon1 isolates showed increased

Figure 3. Tolerance of isolates of Listeria monocytogenes from subcluster Epsilon1a in Germany to benzalkonium chloride. Three representative isolates from human listeriosis clusters Epsilon1a, Epsilon1, and distinct listeriosis clusters Lambda2 (ST2, CT2402), Pi3...

Susceptibility testing revealed sensitivity toward most clinically relevant antimicrobial drugs, but all tested isolates were fully resistant to ceftriaxone and daptomycin (Appendix Table 2), which is consistent with the intrinsic resistance of L. monocytogenes and the absence of additional resistance determinants, as suggested by the resistome approach (Appendix Figure 4). Further resistome analysis demonstrated the prevalence of the emrC gene, which is associated with benzalkonium chloride tolerance (Appendix Figure 4). In full agreement with this observation, Epsilon1a and Epsilon1 isolates demonstrated increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride compared with ST6 or serogroup IVb isolates from other outbreak clusters (Figure 3).

Identification the Outbreak Vehicle

Our case-control study included 41 case-patients and 155 controls. A total of 40/41 (98%) case-patients reported that they purchased food in a single specific supermarket chain, compared with 99/154 controls (64.3%; odds ratio [OR] 22.5, 95% CI 2.9–174.9; p = 0.003). No other supermarket chains were associated with outbreak cases, and we only included case-patients and controls that had purchased food from the specific supermarket chain in further analyses. In the fourth calendar week of 2019, we detected a strong association between cases and consumption of minced meat (OR 42.4, 95% CI 4.3–415.4; p = 0.001) and blood sausage (OR 23.1, 95% CI 4.3–123.5; p<0.001; Table). Among case-patients, 90% reported consuming minced meat and 80% reported consuming blood sausage compared with 23% of controls who consumed minced meat and 45% who consumed blood sausage. None of the case-patients were vegetarians.

To perform risk-oriented screening, food samples were collected in supermarkets and the households of some patients, according to the results of the epidemiologic investigations. In 1 case, L. monocytogenes was detected in 3 open samples from a patient’s refrigerator. Among these, sliced blood sausage purchased at the implicated supermarket chain showed the highest contamination (>3 × 106 CFU/g). This finding led to another round of intensified screening of prepackaged blood sausage. In calendar week 7 of 2019, L. monocytogenes was found in an original sealed package of sliced blood sausage (<10 CFU/g) and in a second sample of blood sausage from the same manufacturer. In total, 5 isolates from patients’ household food items and from blood sausage samples grouped with clinical Epsilon1a isolates after cgMLST (0–3 different alleles, median = 0) and SNP calling (0–2 SNPs, median = 0) (Figure 1; Appendix Figure 2).

The blood sausage was produced by a large meat and sausage manufacturer in Germany and sold in many parts of the country. The product was withdrawn from the market on February 12, 2019. The last clinical Epsilon1a isolate was collected on April 18, 2019. In contrast, Epsilon1 isolates not belonging to the Epsilon1a cluster caused disease even after the end of the Epsilon1a outbreak. The plant was cleaned and disinfected. Thereafter, L. monocytogenes was not detected from products or the production site among several hundred samples collected by food safety inspectors and ≈2,500 control samples collected by the manufacturer.

Discussion

The Epsilon1a outbreak is the largest identified outbreak of listeriosis in Germany and one of the largest documented outbreaks of invasive listeriosis in Europe in >25 years. The last reported outbreak of invasive listeriosis of this size in Europe was during 1992–1993 when 247 patients were infected in France with a serotype IVb clone from contaminated pork tongue in aspic (33). Cantaloupe was the vehicle in the large outbreak in the United States in 2011 that was caused by 5 different clones (10). In contrast, the single clone that caused a large outbreak in South Africa showed strong clonality and the genomes of 326 isolates differed in <4 cgMLST alleles (11). Likewise, the Epsilon1a outbreak was caused by a single clone, and we observed high clonality among isolates. The mutation rate in the natural L. monocytogenes population is 2.6 × 10−7 substitutions per site per year (29). On average, 1 SNP/year can be expected for L. monocytogenes strains under natural conditions. The high clonality of Epsilon1a could imply that the outbreak clone only persisted in the production facility and did not undergo rapid multiplication.

Purchases in a particular supermarket chain and consumption of blood sausage were strongly associated with listeriosis in the case-control study, and the outbreak clone was identified in blood sausage samples from a patient’s household and from the implicated supermarket chain. Blood sausage is heat-treated during production, so contamination likely occurred after production, possibly during slicing or packaging. The shelf-life of sliced blood sausage is several days to a few weeks (34) and the amount of L. monocytogenes found in unopened blood sausage samples was below the limit of 100 CFU/g. Storage beyond the anticipated shelf-life or insufficient refrigeration might have allowed L. monocytogenes to multiply inside the vehicle, which would only be prevented by a zero-tolerance policy.

Typically, pregnancy-related listeriosis accounts for ≈7% of all listeriosis cases (35). However, in this outbreak only 1/112 (0.8%) cases was in a pregnant woman. Official recommendations for pregnant women to apply special hygiene practices to sliced sausage products likely had an effect (36).

Analysis of the Epsilon1a genome has yielded some insights into the infectivity of this ST6 clone. L. monocytogenes ST6 clones were first isolated in 1990 (37), have caused various outbreaks in the past, including the large outbreak in South Africa (11), and are associated with increased rates of meningitis (38). The Epsilon1a clone and the outbreak strain from South Africa are closely related. Thus, 2 descendants of the same historic L. monocytogenes ancestor have spread globally and contaminated food production facilities on 2 different continents. The Epsilon1a clone carried the emrC gene, which presumably caused its increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride (39). Europe banned use of benzalkonium chloride as a disinfectant in 2016 (40), but its past use might have selected tolerant strains.

The identification of this outbreak and its vehicle resulted from an efficient collaboration between public health and food safety authorities in Germany. Several requirements had to be met for successful outbreak clarification: development of a mandatory notification system for systematic patient interviews and an efficient questionnaire to generate hypotheses on possible food sources; implementation of a WGS-based molecular surveillance program for reliable identification of outbreak clusters by public health authorities; systematic collection of food isolates from internal controls and on-demand investigations and use of a harmonized WGS-based subtyping methodology by food safety authorities; and a continuous exchange of information on outbreak clusters between the institutions involved. These prerequisites have identified the causative food vehicles for 5 of 6 large listeriosis clusters that occurred in Germany during 2014–2019, which likely would not have been possible before use of WGS in outbreak investigations. However, introduction of routine interviews of listeriosis patients, regardless of outbreaks, probably could further accelerate identification of outbreak vehicles. In our opinion, the Epsilon1a outbreak demonstrates how WGS-based pathogen surveillance combined with efficient interventions of the involved stakeholders can improve management and prevention of foodborne infectious diseases.

Dr. Halbedel is a molecular microbiologist in the Division of Enteropathogenic Bacteria and Legionella at the Robert Koch Institute in Wernigerode, Germany, and the deputy head of the consultant laboratory for Listeria. His research focuses on physiology, virulence, and epidemiology of Listeria monocytogenes.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrea Thürmer and her team for sequencing support, Birgitt Hahn and Simone Dumschat for excellent technical assistance, and Yvonne Pfeiffer for help with some experiments. We also thank Karan Gautam Kaval for the critical review of the manuscript.

This project was supported by the intensified molecular surveillance initiative of the Robert Koch Institute to A.F. and K.S. (2016–2018, grant no. 832133) and grants of the German Ministry of Health to S.H. (grant no. ZMVI1-2518NIK703) and to A.F. and S.K. (grant no. MolTypList). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Top

References

  1. Werber  D, Hille  K, Frank  C, Dehnert  M, Altmann  D, Müller-Nordhorn  J, et al. Years of potential life lost for six major enteric pathogens, Germany, 2004-2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:9618. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ooi  ST, Lorber  B. Gastroenteritis due to Listeria monocytogenes. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:132732. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Halbedel  S, Prager  R, Banerji  S, Kleta  S, Trost  E, Nishanth  G, et al. A Listeria monocytogenes ST2 clone lacking chitinase ChiB from an outbreak of non-invasive gastroenteritis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:1728. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allerberger  F, Wagner  M. Listeriosis: a resurgent foodborne infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1623. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Charlier  C, Perrodeau  É, Leclercq  A, Cazenave  B, Pilmis  B, Henry  B, et al.; MONALISA study group. Clinical features and prognostic factors of listeriosis: the MONALISA national prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:5109. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Noordhout  CM, Devleesschauwer  B, Angulo  FJ, Verbeke  G, Haagsma  J, Kirk  M, et al. The global burden of listeriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:107382. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance atlas of infectious diseases. 2018 [cited 2020 Mar 16]. https://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx
  8. Ferreira  V, Wiedmann  M, Teixeira  P, Stasiewicz  MJ. Listeria monocytogenes persistence in food-associated environments: epidemiology, strain characteristics, and implications for public health. J Food Prot. 2014;77:15070. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Swaminathan  B, Gerner-Smidt  P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect. 2007;9:123643. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McCollum  JT, Cronquist  AB, Silk  BJ, Jackson  KA, O’Connor  KA, Cosgrove  S, et al. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis associated with cantaloupe. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:94453. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith  AM, Tau  NP, Smouse  SL, Allam  M, Ismail  A, Ramalwa  NR, et al. Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in South Africa, 2017–2018: laboratory activities and experiences associated with whole-genome sequencing analysis of isolates. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019;16:52430. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stephan  R, Althaus  D, Kiefer  S, Lehner  A, Hatz  C, Schmutz  C, et al. Foodborne transmission of Listeria monocytogenes via ready-to-eat salad: A nationwide outbreak in Switzerland, 2013–2014. Food Control. 2015;57:147. DOIGoogle Scholar
  13. Goulet  V, King  LA, Vaillant  V, de Valk  H. What is the incubation period for listeriosis? BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Heiman  KE, Garalde  VB, Gronostaj  M, Jackson  KA, Beam  S, Joseph  L, et al. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis caused by imported cheese and evidence of cross-contamination of other cheeses, USA, 2012. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144:2698708. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and European Food Safety Authority. Multi-country outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 8 infections linked to consumption of salmon products—25 October 2018. Stockholm and Parma: ECDC/EFSA; 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/listeria-multi-country-outbreak-october-2018.pdf
  16. Ruppitsch  W, Prager  R, Halbedel  S, Hyden  P, Pietzka  A, Huhulescu  S, et al. Ongoing outbreak of invasive listeriosis, Germany, 2012 to 2015. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:30094. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Halbedel  S, Prager  R, Fuchs  S, Trost  E, Werner  G, Flieger  A. Whole-genome sequencing of recent Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Germany reveals population structure and disease clusters. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e0011918. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleta  S, Hammerl  JA, Dieckmann  R, Malorny  B, Borowiak  M, Halbedel  S, et al. Molecular tracing to find source of protracted invasive listeriosis outbreak, southern Germany, 2012–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:16803. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson  BR, Tarr  C, Strain  E, Jackson  KA, Conrad  A, Carleton  H, et al. Implementation of nationwide real-time whole-genome sequencing to enhance listeriosis outbreak detection and investigation. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:3806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moura  A, Tourdjman  M, Leclercq  A, Hamelin  E, Laurent  E, Fredriksen  N, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:146270. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwong  JC, Mercoulia  K, Tomita  T, Easton  M, Li  HY, Bulach  DM, et al. Prospective whole-genome sequencing enhances national surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:33342. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen  Y, Gonzalez-Escalona  N, Hammack  TS, Allard  MW, Strain  EA, Brown  EW. Core genome multilocus sequence typing for identification of globally distributed clonal groups and differentiation of outbreak strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:625872. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. World Health Organization. Listeriosis–Spain, disease outbreak news. Geneva: the Organization; updated 2019 Sep 16 [cited 2019 Oct 1]. https://www.who.int/csr/don/16-september-2019-listeriosis-spain
  24. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11290-1:2017. Microbiology of the food chain—Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.—part 1: detection method. Geneva: The Organization; 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. https://www.iso.org/standard/60313.html
  25. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11290-2:2017. Microbiology of the food chain—horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.—part 2: enumeration method. Geneva: The Organization; 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. https://www.iso.org/standard/60314.html
  26. Bubert  A, Hein  I, Rauch  M, Lehner  A, Yoon  B, Goebel  W, et al. Detection and differentiation of Listeria spp. by a single reaction based on multiplex PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:468892. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kérouanton  A, Marault  M, Petit  L, Grout  J, Dao  TT, Brisabois  A. Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay as an alternative method for Listeria monocytogenes serotyping. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;80:1347. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruppitsch  W, Pietzka  A, Prior  K, Bletz  S, Fernandez  HL, Allerberger  F, et al. Defining and evaluating a core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for whole-genome sequence-based typing of Listeria monocytogenes. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:286976. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moura  A, Criscuolo  A, Pouseele  H, Maury  MM, Leclercq  A, Tarr  C, et al. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16185. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Noll  M, Kleta  S, Al Dahouk  S. Antibiotic susceptibility of 259 Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from food, food-processing plants and human samples in Germany. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11:5727. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 9.0, 2019. Basal (Switzerland): EUCAST; 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Dec 5]. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_9.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf
  32. Maury  MM, Tsai  YH, Charlier  C, Touchon  M, Chenal-Francisque  V, Leclercq  A, et al. Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat Genet. 2016;48:30813. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacquet  C, Catimel  B, Brosch  R, Buchrieser  C, Dehaumont  P, Goulet  V, et al. Investigations related to the epidemic strain involved in the French listeriosis outbreak in 1992. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:22426. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pereira  JA, Silva  P, Matos  TJ, Patarata  L. Shelf life determination of sliced Portuguese traditional blood sausage—Morcela de Arroz de Monchique through microbiological challenge and consumer test. J Food Sci. 2015;80:M6428. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Allerberger  F, Huhulescu  S. Pregnancy related listeriosis: treatment and control. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13:395403. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Groeneveld  M, Wichmann-Schauer  H, Oehlenschläger  J, Werber  D, Maschkowski  G; Federal Institute of Agriculture and Food. Listeriosis and toxoplasmosis-safe eating during pregnancy, 2nd edition; B. Klein editor [in German]. Bonn, Germany: Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung; 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. https://www.ble-medienservice.de/frontend/esddownload/index/id/513/on/0346_DL/act/dl
  37. Cantinelli  T, Chenal-Francisque  V, Diancourt  L, Frezal  L, Leclercq  A, Wirth  T, et al. “Epidemic clones” of Listeria monocytogenes are widespread and ancient clonal groups. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:37709. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Koopmans  MM, Brouwer  MC, Bijlsma  MW, Bovenkerk  S, Keijzers  W, van der Ende  A, et al. Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 6 and increased rate of unfavorable outcome in meningitis: epidemiologic cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:24753. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kremer  PH, Lees  JA, Koopmans  MM, Ferwerda  B, Arends  AW, Feller  MM, et al. Benzalkonium tolerance genes and outcome in Listeria monocytogenes meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23:265.e17. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. European Union. Commission implementing decision (EU) 2016/1950 of 4 November 2016 on the non-approval of certain biocidal active substances pursuant to Regulation (EU) No. 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union 2016. p. 16–20 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. https://www.helpdesk-biocides.fr/files/PDF/reglementation_europe/en_non_inscription_sa/20161104_decision_2016_1950_eu_non_approval_susbtances_bpr.pdf

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2607.200225

Original Publication Date: June 10, 2020

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

2These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Addresses for correspondence: Sven Halbedel or Antje Flieger, FG11 Division of Enteropathogenic Bacteria and Legionella, Robert Koch Institute, Burgstrasse 37, 38855 Wernigerode, Germany; or

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: April 27, 2020
Page updated: June 18, 2020
Page reviewed: June 18, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external