Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 1—January 2023

Detection of Monkeypox Virus DNA in Airport Wastewater, Rome, Italy

Giuseppina La RosaComments to Author , Pamela Mancini, Carolina Veneri, Giusy Bonanno Ferraro, Luca Lucentini, Marcello Iaconelli, and Elisabetta Suffredini
Author affiliation: Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy

Cite This Article


Environmental surveillance can be a complementary tool for detecting pathogens circulating in communities. We detected monkeypox virus DNA in wastewater from Italy’s largest airport by using real-time PCR assays targeting the G2R region and F3L and N3R genes and sequencing. Wastewater surveillance can be quickly adapted to investigate emerging threats.

Monkeypox virus (MPXV), a member of the family Poxviridae, causes monkeypox, a viral zoonosis detected in north Africa in the 1970s (1). MPXV can be transmitted between humans through contact with lesions, body fluids, respiratory droplets, and contaminated materials (1).

In May 2022, an epidemic of monkeypox in nonendemic regions outside Africa began receiving worldwide attention. On July 23, 2022, the World Health Organization declared monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern (2), and 24,973 monkeypox cases had been recognized in 45 countries throughout Europe by October 12, 2022 (3).

Rapid identification of outbreaks and clusters is critical for infection control. Sewage surveillance has been recognized as a powerful tool for assessing the circulation of pathogens. After the European Union issued Recommendation 2021/472 (, wastewater surveillance was successfully used to track SARS-CoV-2 and its variants across EU countries (4). Studies have demonstrated MPXV DNA sheds from saliva, feces, urine, semen, and skin lesions (57), suggesting that the viral genome could occur in wastewater. Various research groups involved in SARS-CoV-2 environmental surveillance extended their efforts to investigate MPXV DNA in wastewater. Studies from the Netherlands and western California, USA, have documented successful detection of MPXV DNA in sewage (8; M.K. Wolfe et al., unpub. data, We investigated whether we could detect MPXV in wastewater in Italy.

The Study

We targeted the wastewater treatment plant (WTP) of Italy’s largest airport, Fiumicino Airport, in Rome, which had ≈3,000,000 passengers/month during May–July 2022 ( This WTP has a global capacity of 4,000 m3 per day. We collected 24-hour composite wastewater samples twice a week during May 30–August 3, 2022, for a total of 20 samples.

Before viral concentration, we pretreated samples in a water bath at 56°C for 30 min to inactivate the virus and protect laboratory technicians, as per a previous study (9). We used a polyethylene glycol/sodium chloride precipitation protocol originally developed for SARS-CoV-2 environmental surveillance (10,11) but modified the protocol by increasing the initial wastewater volume to 90 mL (2 tubes of 45 mL) and eluting all the extracted nucleic acids in 50 µL of elution buffer supplied with the kit. We used NucliSens miniMAG (bioMérieux, semi-automatic extraction platform to extract nucleic acids. We used OneStep PCR Inhibitor Removal Kit (Zymo Research, to purify DNA.

We used 3 different real-time PCR assays: 2 published in 2004 that target the N3R and F3L genes (12), and 1 developed in 2010 by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, G2R_G generic real-time PCR assay (13), which targets the G2R region of the tumor necrosis factor receptor gene. After comparing primers and probes with sequences of the current outbreak, we noted mismatches in primers, probes, or both. Therefore, we designed and tested novel primers and probes that had 100% nucleotide identity with current outbreak sequences, then compared these with the original primers and probes (Table 1). We used MPXV (Slovenia ex Gran Canaria) DNA (European Virus Archive Global [EVAg]; as a control for testing primers and probes (Appendix). We further optimized the assays by evaluating different real-time PCR reagents and primer/probe concentrations (Appendix). We prepared reaction mixes in 25 μL by using TaqPath BactoPure Microbial Detection Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific,, 800 mmol of each primer, 500 nmol of the probe, and 5 μL of sample. Amplification conditions included an initial activation step at 95°C for 2 min and 50 cycles of 10 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C. We included 10-fold dilutions of the standardized EVAg MPXV DNA (range 740–0.74 copies/μL) in the runs as positive controls and for the rough estimation of viral loads. For each assay, we assessed the limit of detection at 50% (LOD50) on a pure target (i.e., EVAg MPXV DNA) and on MPXV DNA diluted in nucleic acids previously extracted from wastewater samples collected in Europe before monkeypox emerged.

We designed nested PCR assays targeting the same regions as the real-time PCR assays to confirm results by amplicon sequencing using Primer3Plus software ( (Table 1). We performed reactions by using 1 μL of 10 μmol primer and 2 μL of sample, and Platinum SuperFi II Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a final volume of 25 μL. PCR amplicons on both strands were sequenced by Bio-Fab Research (

All real-time PCR assays successfully amplified the EVAg MPXV DNA. Compared with the original assay, the modified G2R_G assay showed a decrease in the average quantification cycle (Cq) values of 1.34 cycles (21.93 vs. 23.28), demonstrating a better performance. Therefore, we performed subsequent optimization activities and screening of wastewater samples by using the F3L and N3R assays as originally designed but modified the G2R_G assay for our study.

On pure MPXV DNA, the real-time F3L assay had an LOD50 of 0.21 copies/μL, the N3L assay had an LOD50 of 0.31 copies/μL, and G2R_G had an LOD50 of 0.21 copies/μL. For nucleic acids extracted from sewage samples spiked with MPXV, F3L had an LOD50 of 0.43 copies/μL and 2.16 copies/reaction, N3L had an LOD50 of 0.33 copies/μL and 1.65 copies/reaction, and G2R_G had an LOD50 of 0.31 copies/μL and 1.55 copies/reaction (Appendix).

Cq values ranged from 38.37–40.18 for 2 wastewater samples that tested positive by real-time PCR (Table 2), indicating relatively low DNA concentrations in the tested samples. Consensus sequences found 100% similarity by BLAST analysis between study sequences and MPXV strains available in GenBank (accession no. OX248696), thus confirming the presence of MPXV DNA.


A crucial aim of infectious disease surveillance is early detection of cases, outbreaks, and clusters, which is essential for disease control. We explored possible methods for monitoring MPXV through wastewater surveillance, a well-established complementary epidemiologic tool used successfully for viral infectious diseases, including SARS-CoV-2 and polio.

Monkeypox prevalence in the general population was low at the time of sample collection, only 20 cases had been detected in Italy as of May 30, 2022. Thus, to maximize the probability of positive samples among those collected, we tested wastewater samples from a large transportation hub, through which millions of persons travel to and from numerous countries. Because harmonized methods for detecting MPXV in wastewater are not yet available, we tested 3 different real-time PCR assays previously designed for clinical samples. We modified the assays by introducing changes in the primer and probe sequences to mitigate the effect of nucleotide mismatches. Among 20 samples, 3 tested positive for MPXV by real-time or nested PCR and sequencing.

In the next stage, we will test wastewater samples from WTPs enrolled in official SARS-CoV-2 environmental surveillance throughout Italy, to map the geographic distribution of MPXV in the country. Further research efforts should focus on elucidating how detection of viral DNA in sewage can be related to reported and confirmed cases. Factors affecting MPXV detection in wastewater also should be studied, including routes and duration of virus shedding by infected persons, environmental persistence, and analytical sensitivity of the methods used (14).

In conclusion, we adapted SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance for MPXV detection in a large airport WTP. Our methods can be applied to wastewater-based epidemiology for monkeypox outbreaks and provides basic tools, including analytic methods. Wastewater surveillance can be rapidly adapted to detect emerging threats, including monkeypox.

Dr. La Rosa is an environmental virologist at the Department of Environment and Health, National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Rome, Italy. Her primary research interest is viral pathogen surveillance through the monitoring of sewer systems.





  1. World Health Organization. Monkeypox 19 May 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 16].
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General declares the ongoing monkeypox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, 23 Jul 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 16].,in%20the%20WHO%20European%20Region
  3. European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention - World Health Organization. Joint ECDC-WHO Regional Office for Europe monkeypox surveillance bulletin 12 Oct 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 16].
  4. European Commission. Coronavirus response: monitoring of wastewater contributes to tracking coronavirus and variants across all EU countries 17 Mar 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 16].
  5. Peiró-Mestres  A, Fuertes  I, Camprubí-Ferrer  D, Marcos  , Vilella  A, Navarro  M, et al.; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona Monkeypox Study Group. Frequent detection of monkeypox virus DNA in saliva, semen, and other clinical samples from 12 patients, Barcelona, Spain, May to June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2200503. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lapa  D, Carletti  F, Mazzotta  V, Matusali  G, Pinnetti  C, Meschi  S, et al.; INMI Monkeypox Study Group. Monkeypox virus isolation from a semen sample collected in the early phase of infection in a patient with prolonged seminal viral shedding. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:12679. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Antinori  A, Mazzotta  V, Vita  S, Carletti  F, Tacconi  D, Lapini  LE, et al.; INMI Monkeypox Group. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of four cases of monkeypox support transmission through sexual contact, Italy, May 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2200421. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Jonge  EF, Peterse  CM, Koelewijn  JM, van der Drift  AR, van der Beek  RFHJ, Nagelkerke  E, et al. The detection of monkeypox virus DNA in wastewater samples in the Netherlands. Sci Total Environ. 2022;852:158265; Epub ahead of print. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. La Rosa  G, Iaconelli  M, Mancini  P, Bonanno Ferraro  G, Veneri  C, Bonadonna  L, et al. First detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewaters in Italy. Sci Total Environ. 2020;736:139652. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wu  F, Zhang  J, Xiao  A, Gu  X, Lee  WL, Armas  F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected from clinically confirmed cases. mSystems. 2020;5:e0061420. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutrupi  F, Cadonna  M, Manara  S, Postinghel  M, La Rosa  G, Suffredini  E, et al. The wave of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant resulted in a rapid spike and decline as highlighted by municipal wastewater surveillance. Environ Technol Innov. 2022;28:102667. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kulesh  DA, Loveless  BM, Norwood  D, Garrison  J, Whitehouse  CA, Hartmann  C, et al. Monkeypox virus detection in rodents using real-time 3′-minor groove binder TaqMan assays on the Roche LightCycler. Lab Invest. 2004;84:12008. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Li  Y, Zhao  H, Wilkins  K, Hughes  C, Damon  IK. Real-time PCR assays for the specific detection of monkeypox virus West African and Congo Basin strain DNA. J Virol Methods. 2010;169:2237. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tiwari  A, Adhikari  S, Kaya  D, Islam  MA, Malla  B, Sherchan  SP, et al. Monkeypox outbreak: Wastewater and environmental surveillance perspective. Sci Total Environ. 2023;856:159166. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2901.221311

Original Publication Date: December 07, 2022

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 1—January 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Giuseppina La Rosa, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome 00161, Italy

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 15, 2022
Page updated: December 22, 2022
Page reviewed: December 22, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.